
In brief
- U.S. growth is slowing rather than stalling; we see GDP modestly below trend by year-end, but believe the Fed has sufficient room to cut rates quickly should growth fall sharply.
- Policy uncertainty remains elevated with tariffs a near-term downside risk, potentially offset by upside risks from tax cuts and deregulation later in the year.
- The U.S. economy is in late cycle. While policy stimulus in other regions may moderate the impact of tariffs, this economic environment calls for diversification across regions and sectors.
- In regional equity we favor Japan, UK and emerging markets with Australia and Canada less preferred. In the U.S. we prefer technology and financials to staples and materials. We see value in holding Australian and Italian duration with underweights to Japanese government bonds.
- At the aggregate level, we are broadly neutral to modestly overweight stocks; we maintain an overweight to credit with reasonable conviction and are mildly overweight to duration.
Policy uncertainty and cooling growth
At his press conference after the Federal Reserve (Fed) March meeting, Fed Chair Jay Powell used the word “uncertainty” 10 times. Still, despite a 10% dip in S&P 500 in the first quarter, Wall Street’s main uncertainty index – the VIX – remained remarkably well anchored. Meaningful changes in economic policy may be fueling uncertainty among central bankers and investors alike, but the U.S. economy appears to be slowing rather than stalling.
In our year ahead outlook, we noted that if the new Trump administration put early emphasis on tax cuts and deregulation it could boost the economy and markets; but should it lead on immigration and tariffs, markets might find it harder to digest. The administration’s early focus on tariffs has surely contributed to lower consensus growth forecasts. But the economy had already begun to cool in the wake of restrictive monetary policy and a fading impulse from labor supply.
Our base case for the U.S. economy in 2025 sees below-trend GDP growth of 1.7% and core CPI at 3.1% by year end. Risk of recession has ticked up slightly from 15% to 20%, but we think the Fed has ample scope to cut further and faster than the two cuts we expect this year. Robust corporate and household balance sheets add resilience to the economy even as corporate confidence has dipped.
Around the world, a more bombastic U.S. administration has elicited some strong policy responses. Germany’s fiscal package could add over 70bps to GDP and kickstart the beleaguered manufacturing sector. A brighter outlook for European investment, particularly defense spending, may merely offset the drag of tariffs, but it signals a meaningful – and long overdue – shift in fiscal policy. Arguably Vice President J.D. Vance’s controversial address to European leaders in Munich has done more for European unity than any policymaker since Mario Draghi’s “whatever it takes” speech in 2012.
China, too, is responding to tariff talk. Its looser monetary policy is welcome amid low inflation, and President Xi’s recent meeting with business leaders marks a shift in the government’s stance toward the private sector. Policy actions around the world aim to blunt the impact of threatened tariffs but may also serve to narrow the gap between U.S. and rest-of-world growth in 2025.
Adapting portfolios to balance tariffs and tax cuts
Policy uncertainty weighs downside risks from tariffs with upside risks from tax cuts and deregulation – albeit probably later in the year. In our portfolios we have trimmed overall risk to weather recent volatility and in anticipation of further event risk around tariff policy. We are neutral or very modestly overweight (OW) equity but maintain a higher conviction in our credit OW. Scope for softer growth that could spur the Fed into action supports a small OW in duration. Our quant models tell us that the best opportunities are in relative value positions that capture valuation and policy differentials.
U.S. equity valuations unwound a little of their valuation excess in the first quarter and the outperformance of defensives aligns with softer GDP. We estimate that a 5%-7% hit to S&P 500 EPS growth from tariffs will constrain the upside for U.S. stocks. Our quant models are negative on the U.S. market given high valuations, but large cap tech stocks are a bright spot. Now at their lowest valuation premium to the index since 2017, large cap tech scores well on quality screens.
Globally, our preferred markets are Japan, UK, and emerging markets; our least favored is Australia. Europe – the best performing developed market year-to-date – has overshot potential earnings growth, in our view. While we are optimistic on European policy developments in the longer run, we would not chase today’s extended valuations.
Cooling growth but limited recession risk in the U.S. is a positive backdrop for credit. Spreads are optically tight but all in yields remain attractive in high yield and credit fundamentals such as interest coverage are solid. Low defaults and strong demand in primary markets further increase our conviction that credit will perform well this year. We see U.S. 10-year Treasury yields in a trading range between 4.50% and 3.75% for the time being and we find value in duration at current levels. In international markets we favor Australia and Italy, and we remain underweight Japanese bonds given rising wage settlements and the likelihood of further rate hikes.
Overall risk in our portfolio is lower than in late 2024 given the potential for further volatility as markets calibrate the impact of tariffs. Nevertheless, we are optimistic that as the policy trajectory becomes clearer, and the focus moves towards the tax and deregulation agenda, we will find opportunities to add risk. Should tariff debates resolve without descending into tit-for-tat trade disputes confidence could rebound steadily over the second quarter.
In sum, we see growth cooling but not cracking and believe that the Fed and other central banks have ample ammunition to support the global economy. Trade wars, a pickup in inflation, or overly restrictive monetary policy present risks to our view. But on balance we lean positively through credit today and would look to add equity risk should we see further weakness in stock markets.
Multi-Asset Solutions Key Insights & “Big Ideas”
The Key Insights and “Big Ideas” are discussed in depth at our Strategy Summit and collectively reflect the core views of the portfolio managers and research teams within Multi-Asset Solutions. They represent the common perspectives we come back to and regularly retest in all our asset allocation discussions. We use these “Big Ideas” as a way of sense-checking our portfolio tilts and ensuring they are reflected in all of our portfolios.
- U.S. economy cooling but not collapsing; scope for business cycle to extend, with growth a little below trend in 2025; global growth potentially improving given policy response to tariff threats.
- U.S. Inflation remains above target, Fed watching jobs data closely and will act on weakness, expect two cuts in 2025, another in 2026.
- 10-year U.S. yields in trading range of 3.75%-4.50%; modestly long global duration and favor BTPs and Australia over JGBs.
- Modest scope for credit spread compression but yields near 8% in high yield and low distress ratio supportive for credit.
- Slowing growth but low odds of recession suggest OW credit but nearer neutral on equity, tariff risk keeps stocks volatile for now.
- Mag-6 a topside risk for U.S. equity indices after valuation derating; globally, prefer Japan, UK, and Hong Kong/EM equity.
- Real estate demand and capital inflows picking up, return potential and inflation hedging qualities are attractive.
- Key risks: Resurgence of inflation, unduly hawkish Fed, tariffs, labor market weakness, and sharp tightening of credit conditions.
Active allocation views
These asset class views apply to a 6- to 12-month horizon. Up/down arrows indicate a positive (▲) or negative (▼) change in view since the prior quarterly Strategy Summit. These views should not be construed as a recommended portfolio. This summary of our individual asset class views indicates strength of conviction and relative preferences across a broad-based range of assets but is independent of portfolio construction considerations.
Underweight
Neutral
Overweight
Asset Class | Opportunity Set | UW | N | OW | Change | Conviction | Description | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main asset classes | Equities | Equities — Neutral | ▼ | Not applicable | Global growth converges toward trend, supporting ongoing earnings growth; valuations a headwind even with easing cycle in play | |||
Duration | Duration — Overweight | ▲ | Low | Rate cutting cycle limits upside for yields and moderation in the pace of U.S. growth supports a constructive view | ||||
Credit | Credit — Overweight | Neutral | Moderate | Below-trend growth, healthy fundamentals, and attractive all-in yields supportive despite tight spreads | ||||
Preference by asset class | Equities | U.S | U.S — Neutral | ▼ | Not applicable | Solid EPS growth – driven by tech – and quality bias are supportive, but elevated valuations will remain a headwind while policy uncertainty persists | ||
Europe | Europe — Neutral | ▲ | Not applicable | More robust fiscal impulse and "Europe first" agenda supportive, but valuations stretched versus history and positioning more neutral than start of 2025 | ||||
Japan | Japan — Overweight | Neutral | Moderate | Most positive earnings outlook and revisions across regions, reasonable valuations, and light positioning; upside risk from corporate governance | ||||
UK | UK — Overweight | Neutral | Low | Attractive valuations (especially relative to other DM equity markets) and limited tariff risk partially offset by mixed fundamentals and technicals | ||||
Australia | Australia — Underweight | Neutral | Moderate | Weak earnings growth, negative revisions, and stretched valuations; soft demand for base metals a headwind to mining sector | ||||
Canada | Canada — Underweight | ▼ | Moderate | Negative technicals and low quality characteristics, with the risk of further downside from trade war with the U.S. | ||||
Hong Kong | Hong Kong — Overweight | Neutral | Low | Low valuations, improving outlook for the tech sector, and shift in private sector stance supportive; however, fiscal policy remains reactive and insufficient | ||||
EM | EM — Neutral | Neutral | Not applicable | Valuations are attractive on a relative basis and ERR's are improving, although U.S. trade policy and persistent outflows remain a risk | ||||
Fixed Income | U.S Treasuries | U.S Treasuries — Underweight | ▼ | Low | Disinflation process intact despite sticky price pressure; rates likely range-bound but risk is to the downside given below-trend growth | |||
German Bunds | German Bunds — Neutral | ▼ | Not applicable | Valuations more attractive after recent rise in rates, but debt brake reform & increased defense spending will lead to structurally higher deficits | ||||
JGB | JGB — Underweight | Neutral | Low | Further BoJ hikes in 2025 and the path of wages keep the risk to JGB yields to the upside, relative valuation looking less attractive | ||||
UK Gifts | UK Gifts — Neutral | Neutral | Not applicable | Favorable valuations offset by mixed inflation trends; lacking clear catalyst to unlock this value | ||||
Australia bonds | Australia bonds — Overweight | ▲ | Low | Valuations attractive, especially from a carry & real rate perspective; recent inflation prints create scope for RBA easing | ||||
Canada bonds | Canada bonds — Neutral | ▲ | Not applicable | Economic activity potentially finding a bottom as downside inflation surprises fade; relative valuations unattractive and technicals a headwind | ||||
BTPs | BTPs — Overweight | Neutral | Low | Declining ECB policy rate should be supportive for periphery bonds as valuations are fair; higher YTD issuance has been well digested | ||||
Corporate Inv. Grade | Corporate Inv. Grade — Overweight | ▲ | Low | Robust corporate health and demand for quality carry; spreads tight, but carry advantage over sovereigns persists | ||||
Corporate High Yield | Corporate High Yield — Overweight | Neutral | Moderate | Contained recession risks and healthy fundamentals & technicals are supportive; spreads are tight but all-in yields are attractive | ||||
EMD Sovereign | EMD Sovereign — Neutral | Neutral | Not applicable | Favor U.S. high yield to EMD sovereign given more fragile tail credits in EMD and U.S. trade policy uncertainty | ||||
Currency | USD | USD — Neutral | ▼ | Not applicable | Carry still attractive, but macro signals have deteriorated; USD screens expensive and policy crosscurrents not as clearly positive as originally thought | |||
EUR | EUR — Overweight | ▲ | Low | Cheap on a PPP basis and growth differentials may be turning more favorable; technicals improving given recent equity momentum | ||||
JPY | JPY — Underweight | ▼ | Low | BoJ the only major central bank hiking rates, but not clear that data alone can push JPY higher; positioning remains elevated | ||||
CHF | CHF — Underweight | Neutral | Moderate | Valuations and fundamentals both negative; SNB still biased toward weaker currency to mitigate disinflation risks |
Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; assessments are made using data and information up to March 2025. For illustrative purposes only.
Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss. Diversification among investment options and asset classes may help to reduce overall volatility.
Multi-Asset Solutions
J.P. Morgan Multi-Asset Solutions manages over USD 285 billion in assets and draws upon the unparalleled breadth and depth of expertise and investment capabilities of the organization. Our asset allocation research and insights are the foundation of our investment process, which is supported by a global research team of 20-plus dedicated research professionals with decades of combined experience in a diverse range of disciplines.
Multi-Asset Solutions’ asset allocation views are the product of a rigorous and disciplined process that integrates:
- Qualitative insights that encompass macro-thematic insights, business-cycle views and systematic and irregular market opportunities
- Quantitative analysis that considers market inefficiencies, intra- and cross-asset class models, relative value and market directional strategies
- Strategy Summits and ongoing dialogue in which research and investor teams debate, challenge and develop the firm’s asset allocation views
As of September 30, 2024
0903c02a81cef736