
Joint research between J.P. Morgan Asset Management and the Employee Benefit Research Institute uncovers new connections between financial wellness and retirement readiness
When the SECURE 2.0 Act was passed in 2022, authorizing in-plan provisions such as emergency savings and an employer match on student loan repayment, it underscored that financial wellness is inextricably linked to retirement readiness. But how, exactly?
So many financial factors influence a plan participant’s ability to save and reach a successful retirement outcome. Plan sponsors have struggled to understand those links and thus find it difficult to evaluate the benefits of including financial wellness considerations in their retirement plans.
The latest research collaboration between J.P. Morgan Asset Management and the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), which leverages data across 29 million Chase households1 and 11 million 401(k) plan participant records, presents a new way of thinking about this critical – but still elusive – subject.
Spending spikes and retirement readiness
Our research aimed to measure financial well-being. As a proxy, we used a household’s ability to cope with the financial stress that accompanies hard-to-manage spikes in spending.
We identified the 35,000 households that had three contiguous years of both 401(k) and spending data from 2016-2020 and examined how often they encountered financial stress, measured in spending spikes. Over the three-year span, the spending spike was determined to take place in the second year. We then observed how that financial stress impacted their retirement savings and overall financial well-being. Among the questions we posed:
- How prepared are households to deal with spending spikes?
- How much does spending increase?
- How do households handle their spending spikes?
- What are the effects on 401(k) account balances?
We discovered that households with spending spikes generally have a precarious financial profile. Compared with households with no spending spikes, they have lower income, higher levels of credit card debt and a greater likelihood of taking out a 401(k) loan. We were surprised by the magnitude of the difference in retirement readiness between these households and those with stronger financial profiles.
Our research may offer a useful perspective for plan sponsors as they consider the benefits and potential structure of employee financial wellness programs. In particular, the findings document the connections between spending spikes, credit card debt and 401(k) plan participant behaviors. The research reaffirms the importance of focusing on actual participant behaviors and the potential for cash flow volatility in defined contribution plans.
Data definitions
First, we’ll define a few key terms.
Unfunded spending spike: A monthly unfunded spending spike is a spike at least 25% above the previous 12 months' median spending that cannot be funded by the household’s income and cash reserves in that month.
Separately, we discuss increases in spending that cannot be funded by the household’s income alone.
Credit card utilization ratio: Revolving credit card balance as a percentage of total available credit.
Spending ratio: Annual spending divided by annual net income.
How we conducted our research
Our research focused on those 401(k) plan participants who experience spending spikes (Exhibit 1). We examined how these participants fund the spending spikes through a 401(k) loan and/or credit cards. We also identified connections between credit card usage and the probability of taking out a 401(k) loan.
1 in 3 households experienced at least one spending spike above their income and cash reserves
Exhibit 1: Household observation segmentation
.png?v=1731336511772)
Note: 1 Likely HHs include those that spend less than their income; spend consistently more than their income; experience spikes <25% of the last 12 months’ median. 2 Likely HHs include those who increase spending by at least 25% at least one month in any given year.
Source: “How Financial Factors Outside of a 401(k) Plan Can Impact Retirement Readiness,” Employee Benefit Research Institute and J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
Key findings
Our research found that households with spending spikes tend to have a higher level of credit card usage, spend a higher percentage of their net income, and earn less income.
How prepared are households to deal with spending spikes?
Nine in 10 households encountered at least one spending spike in a given year that could not be covered by their current income. More than one in three households could not cover their increased spending with their current income and cash reserves.
How much does spending increase?
For three in four households with income under $150,000, a spending increase above $2,500 could not be funded by income alone. We focus on the $2,500 level in part because SECURE 2.0 sets $2,500 as the maximum emergency saving account balance for non-highly compensated employees.
J.P. Morgan’s Guide to Retirement examined spending spikes (referred to as shocks in the Guide) to determine recommended emergency savings. We found that for most participants, two to three months of net income in reserve would cover most spending spikes.
How are unfunded spikes handled?
Facing an unfunded spending spike, households appear to first increase their credit card debt and then take a 401(k) loan (Exhibit 2).
Among those participants who experienced an unfunded spending spike, 17% took a 401(k) plan loan compared with 7% of those without a spending spike – more than a 2x increase.
Among those with unfunded spending spikes, 3 in 5 households took action to raise cash, mostly through credit cards and 401(k) loans
Exhibit 2: Likelihood of taking specific actions in the same year as an unfunded spending spike/no unfunded spending spike

Source: “How Financial Factors Outside of a 401(k) Plan Can Impact Retirement Readiness,” Employee Benefit Research Institute and J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
A household’s credit card utilization ratio plays an important role in determining whether a participant takes a plan loan. When less credit is available via a credit card, participants seemingly have no choice but to take a plan loan to meet expenses that cannot be covered by income and cash reserves. One statistic tells the story: The median credit card utilization ratio of participants taking a plan loan was 64% compared with 17% for those who did not take a plan loan (Exhibit 3).
Households with 401(k) loans have much higher credit card utilization
Exhibit 3: Credit card utilization

Source: “How Financial Factors Outside of a 401(k) Plan Can Impact Retirement Readiness,” Employee Benefit Research Institute and J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
Gauging the impact on retirement outcomes
Higher credit card utilization, commonly used to manage spending spikes, is associated with lower savings rates and balances in 401(k) plans, even when controlling for tenure and income (Exhibits 4 and 5). For example, for participants with tenures of more than 15 years and incomes between $75,000 and $100,000, the median 401(k) account balance is $184,000 for those with credit card ratios of 0%. For those with credit card ratios of 80%-100%, the median account balance is $80,000. In other words, the 401(k) account balances of participants with more prudent credit card utilization were more than 2x larger than those of their debt-burdened counterparts.
Ripple effects: Households with high credit card utilization saved at lower rates than their less-burdened counterparts
Exhibit 4: Median contribution rates by credit card ratios in year 1

Note: Participants with incomes of $75,000-$99,999 and tenure of more than 15 years; Median balance amounts have been rounded to the nearest $10
Source: “How Financial Factors Outside of a 401(k) Plan Can Impact Retirement Readiness,” Employee Benefit Research Institute and J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
Households with high credit card utilization were more likely to have lower 401(k) balances
Exhibit 5: Account balances by credit card utilization

Note: Participants with income of $75,000-$99,999 and tenure of more than 15 years.
Source: “How Financial Factors Outside of a 401(k) Plan Can Impact Retirement Readiness,” Employee Benefit Research Institute and J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
Key takeaways for plan sponsors
What are the key takeaways of our research for plan sponsors?
First, emergency savings is a necessity for everyone. Households without an adequate cash buffer take on debt, become financially more vulnerable and find themselves at risk of not achieving a successful retirement outcome. This key finding highlights the importance of financial wellness programs.
As we’ve noted, SECURE 2.0 allows plan sponsors to offer an emergency savings account inside a 401(k) plan, with a maximum account balance of $2,500 for non-highly compensated employees. Our research suggests that a maximum balance of $2,500 may be too low. But clearly, offering an in-plan emergency savings account, especially if it is paired with automatic enrollment, will encourage more employees to have at least some money set aside for unanticipated expenses.
We recommend that plan sponsors discuss with plan advisors and administrators the pros and cons of such an in-plan offering. But no one can reasonably debate the need for emergency savings. At a minimum, we think plan sponsors should consider offering employee education on the subject.
Second, participants who take a 401(k) loan are likely to be struggling with credit card debt. When a participant borrows from a 401(k), it can be a powerful signal to plan sponsors that offer financial wellness programs to engage on credit card debt management. Advice and education will be most relevant when that struggle is ongoing.
Finally, plan sponsors need to recognize and manage the impact of cash flow volatility within a plan. The cause of that volatility, “leakage” from plan accounts through 401(k) loans and withdrawals, can have outsized effects on retirement readiness. A focus on cash flow volatility is especially important as plan sponsors craft their Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA) offering. We recommend that plan sponsors explicitly take participant behavior into account when defining criteria for their QDIA.
In short, what happens outside the plan – through participants’ spending and credit card usage – can exacerbate in-plan cash flow volatility and lead to less successful retirement outcomes.
Conclusion
Our research will likely resonate in different ways with different plan sponsors as they consider links between financial wellness and retirement readiness. Certainly, the subject is top of mind: In our 2023 plan sponsor survey, 85% of respondents said they felt a sense of responsibility for their employees’ financial wellness. Defining and measuring financial well-being has always been a mix of art and science. We think our research can help on both fronts.
1 This number represents the number of households we shared with EBRI to conduct the analysis. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase) serves nearly half of America’s households with a broad range of financial services including checking, savings, investments, credit cards and loans. In this analysis, the Chase data sample is restricted to the households in 2016-2020 who use Chase as their primary banking institution, and their total household spending through all payment mechanisms (select credit and debit card transactions, electronic payment transactions, check and cash payments) and sources of income including wage income, Social Security, annuity, pensions, etc. can be linked to the EBRI/ICI Database. For more information about Chase, visit the following website: https://www.chase.com/digital/resources/about-chase.
This paper was informed by research from a previous publication that was a joint effort between the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) and J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM) to deliver data-driven research to further the retirement success of Americans, with a commitment to providing unique fact-based insights to policymakers, plan sponsors and plan providers to help build a stronger retirement system. This paper was produced by JPMAM alone and includes JPMAM’s view only. EBRI was not involved in the writing of this paper.
EBRI is a Washington, D.C.-based organization committed exclusively to public policy research and education on economic security and employee benefit issues.
In an ongoing collaborative effort, the Employee Benefit Research Institute and the Investment Company Institute (ICI) maintain the EBRI/ICI Participant-Directed Retirement Plan Data Collection Project, which is the largest, most representative repository of information about individual 401(k) plan participant accounts. ICI is the leading association representing regulated funds globally, including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), closed-end funds and unit investment trusts (UITs) in the United States, and similar funds offered to investors in jurisdictions worldwide. While this paper uses data from the EBRI/ICI database, ICI did not participate in the research collaboration between EBRI and J.P. Morgan Asset Management and was not involved in the writing of the inaugural report or this paper.
EBRI is not affiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.
DATA PRIVACY: We have a number of security protocols in place which are designed to ensure all customer data is kept confidential and secure. We use reasonable physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that are designed to comply with federal standards to protect and limit access to personal information. There are several key controls and policies in place which are designed to ensure customer data is safe, secure and anonymous: (1) Before J.P. Morgan Asset Management (JPMAM) receives the data, all selected data is highly aggregated and all unique identifiable information, including names, account numbers, addresses, dates of birth and Social Security numbers, is removed. (2) JPMAM has put privacy protocols in place for its researchers. Researchers are obligated to use the data solely for approved research and are obligated not to re-identify any individual represented in the data. (3) JPMAM does not allow the publication of any information about an individual or entity. Any data point included in any publication based on customer data may only reflect aggregate information. (4) The data is stored on a secure server and can be accessed only under strict security procedures.
Researchers are not permitted to export the data outside of JPMorgan Chase’s (JPMC) systems. The system complies with all JPMC Information Technology Risk Management requirements for the monitoring and security of data. (5) JPMAM provides valuable insights to policymakers, businesses and financial professionals, but these insights cannot come at the expense of consumer privacy. We take every precaution to ensure the confidence and security of our account holders’ private information.
This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purposes. By receiving this communication, you agree with the intended purpose described above. Any examples used in this material are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. None of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, its affiliates or representatives is suggesting that the recipient or any other person take a specific course of action or any action at all. Communications such as this are not impartial and are provided in connection with the advertising and marketing of products and services. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, you should seek individualized advice from your personal financial, legal, tax and other financial professionals that takes into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of your own situation.
Opinions and estimates offered constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice, as are statements of financial market trends, which are based on current market conditions. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. References to future returns are not promises or even estimates of actual returns a client portfolio may achieve.
Telephone calls and electronic communications may be monitored and/or recorded. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://www.jpmorgan.com/privacy.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. J.P. Morgan Funds are distributed by JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc.; member of FINRA.
If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.
© 2024 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
09np233108195858