On the Mind of Investors

When might the Fed end its quantitative tightening (QT) program?

Jordan Jackson

Global Market Strategist

Published: 11/22/2024
Listen now
00:00

Hi, my name is Jordan Jackson, Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management and welcome to On the Minds of investors.. Today's post ask the question "When might the Fed end its quantitative tightening (QT) program?" Former Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Janet Yellen described the first episode of balance sheet drawdown from 2017-2019 to be “like watching paint dry”. This was largely the case until a spike in the overnight reverse repo rate1 in September 2019 by more than 3% above the Federal Reserve’s target range at the time, forced the Fed to intervene and cut administered rates2 and end quantitative tightening (QT).

Since May 2022, the Fed has reduced its balance sheet by almost $2 trillion3, and it’s similarly been “like watching paint dry.” However, the Fed and market participants are sensitive to avoid another liquidity scare. As such, investors are curious; what might lead the Fed to end its current QT program and how soon?

To answer this, it’s useful to assess the liability side of the Fed’s balance sheet to understand where the fresh digitally printed money ends up after buying a U.S. Treasury security. The most notable growth in liabilities under COVID-era quantitative easing (QE) were bank reserves (+$2trn) and the reverse repo facility (RRP) (+$2.3trn). Under the Fed’s current QT program, declines in the RRP have accounted for most of the “money drain” from the system4.

The RRP is perceived as a measure of “excess’ liquidity meaning there are more dollars in short term vehicles—primarily money market funds—than there are supply of Treasury bills in the open market, and thus Treasury collateral is provided at the Fed via the RRP. However, as the Fed’s balance sheet continues to shrink, the RRP is well on its way to zero. Given this, a continuation of QT could last another three months without hiccup; thereafter, most of the decline in liquidity is likely to be seen in falling bank reserves.

At the beginning of 2019, Fed Governor Waller noted that bank reserves of roughly 10-11% of GDP might be sufficient. Bank reserves as a % of GDP are currently at these levels, suggesting the Fed is poised to end QT sometime in 1H2025 once RRP drainage is complete. Should the level of reserves fall below this threshold, however, its likely to lead to volatility in short term rates. Simply put, when there is enough short-term money/liquidity in the system, short term rates tend to be well behaved; when there isn’t, overnight rates are at risk of spiking. 

For investors, the Fed is committed to maintaining an ample reserves regime because it promotes market stability and allows the committee the flexibility to react. Moreover, the balance sheet has increasingly been viewed by Fed members as somewhat independent to the direction of monetary policy. Currently the Fed is cutting rates while continuing QT, so hypothetically they could hike rates with QE if they needed to address market functioning and inflation at the same time. Importantly, regardless of the direction policy needs to go next year, they can only be successful if the market is functioning as intended. Hence, they should learn from their mistakes in 2019 and consider ending QT a bit earlier especially given fiscal policy uncertainty next year.

 

1 The Fed's reverse repo rate is the interest rate paid to market participants who lend cash to the Fed in exchange for Treasury collateral. In a reverse repo, the Fed sells a security to a counterparty and agrees to buy it back at a specified price and time in the future.

2 On September 19, the day after the FOMC meeting, the Fed implemented a 5-basis-point technical adjustment to the two administered rates: the interest rate on excess reserves (IOER) was lowered to 20 basis points below the top of the target range and the ON RRP rate was lowered to 5 basis points below the bottom of the target range. By moving IOER lower in the target range, the Fed reduced the risk of EFFR moving above the top of the range.

3 As of November 14, 2024.

4 Bank reserves have been stable at roughly $3.2 trillion while the RRP is currently at ~$200bn as of November 14, 2024. 

The most notable growth in liabilities under COVID-era quantitative easing (QE) were bank reserves (+$2trn) and the reverse repo facility (RRP) (+$2.3trn).

Former Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Janet Yellen described the first episode of balance sheet drawdown from 2017-2019 to be “like watching paint dry”. This was largely the case until a spike in the overnight reverse repo rate1 in September 2019 by more than 3% above the Federal Reserve’s target range at the time, forced the Fed to intervene and cut administered rates2 and end quantitative tightening (QT).

Since May 2022, the Fed has reduced its balance sheet by almost $2 trillion3, and it’s similarly been “like watching paint dry.” However, the Fed and market participants are sensitive to avoid another liquidity scare. As such, investors are curious; what might lead the Fed to end its current QT program and how soon?

To answer this, it’s useful to assess the liability side of the Fed’s balance sheet to understand where the fresh digitally printed money ends up after buying a U.S. Treasury security. The most notable growth in liabilities under COVID-era quantitative easing (QE) were bank reserves (+$2trn) and the reverse repo facility (RRP) (+$2.3trn). Under the Fed’s current QT program, declines in the RRP have accounted for most of the “money drain” from the system4.

The RRP is perceived as a measure of “excess’ liquidity meaning there are more dollars in short term vehicles—primarily money market funds—than there are supply of Treasury bills in the open market, and thus Treasury collateral is provided at the Fed via the RRP. However, as the Fed’s balance sheet continues to shrink, the RRP is well on its way to zero. Given this, a continuation of QT could last another three months without hiccup; thereafter, most of the decline in liquidity is likely to be seen in falling bank reserves.

At the beginning of 2019, Fed Governor Waller noted that bank reserves of roughly 10-11% of GDP might be sufficient. Bank reserves as a % of GDP are currently at these levels, suggesting the Fed is poised to end QT sometime in 1H2025 once RRP drainage is complete. Should the level of reserves fall below this threshold, however, its likely to lead to volatility in short term rates. Simply put, when there is enough short-term money/liquidity in the system, short term rates tend to be well behaved; when there isn’t, overnight rates are at risk of spiking. 

For investors, the Fed is committed to maintaining an ample reserves regime because it promotes market stability and allows the committee the flexibility to react. Moreover, the balance sheet has increasingly been viewed by Fed members as somewhat independent to the direction of monetary policy. Currently the Fed is cutting rates while continuing QT, so hypothetically they could hike rates with QE if they needed to address market functioning and inflation at the same time. Importantly, regardless of the direction policy needs to go next year, they can only be successful if the market is functioning as intended. Hence, they should learn from their mistakes in 2019 and consider ending QT a bit earlier especially given fiscal policy uncertainty next year.

When bank reserves fall below 10-11% of GDP, liquidity is scarce and cause volatility in short term rates

Bank reserves as % of GDP (LHS), Reserve Demand Elasticity (RDE*, basis points/%, RHS), weekly

When bank reserves fall below 10-11% of GDP, liquidity is scarce and cause volatility in short term rates

Source: BEA, Federal Reserve, Haver Analytics, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. *Reserve Demand Elasticity (RDE) shows by how many basis points the spread between the federal funds rate and the interest on reserve balances (IORB) would move for an increase in aggregate reserves equal to 1 percent of banks’ total assets.Reserves are ample when the supply of reserves is sufficiently large that the federal funds rate is not materially sensitive to everyday changes in aggregate reserves; that is, the elasticity of the federal funds rate to reserve shocks is small, so that active management of the supply of reserves by the Federal Reserve is not necessary.  When the RDE is statistically indistinguishable from zero, the estimate suggests that reserves are abundant. Data are as of November 21, 2024.  

1 The Fed's reverse repo rate is the interest rate paid to market participants who lend cash to the Fed in exchange for Treasury collateral. In a reverse repo, the Fed sells a security to a counterparty and agrees to buy it back at a specified price and time in the future.
2 On September 19, the day after the FOMC meeting, the Fed implemented a 5-basis-point technical adjustment to the two administered rates: the interest rate on excess reserves (IOER) was lowered to 20 basis points below the top of the target range and the ON RRP rate was lowered to 5 basis points below the bottom of the target range. By moving IOER lower in the target range, the Fed reduced the risk of EFFR moving above the top of the range.
3 As of November 14, 2024.
4 Bank reserves have been stable at roughly $3.2 trillion while the RRP is currently at ~$200bn as of November 14, 2024. 
09lj242211174150
Jordan Jackson

Global Market Strategist

Published: 11/22/2024
Listen now
00:00

Hi, my name is Jordan Jackson, Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management and welcome to On the Minds of investors.. Today's post ask the question "When might the Fed end its quantitative tightening (QT) program?" Former Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Janet Yellen described the first episode of balance sheet drawdown from 2017-2019 to be “like watching paint dry”. This was largely the case until a spike in the overnight reverse repo rate1 in September 2019 by more than 3% above the Federal Reserve’s target range at the time, forced the Fed to intervene and cut administered rates2 and end quantitative tightening (QT).

Since May 2022, the Fed has reduced its balance sheet by almost $2 trillion3, and it’s similarly been “like watching paint dry.” However, the Fed and market participants are sensitive to avoid another liquidity scare. As such, investors are curious; what might lead the Fed to end its current QT program and how soon?

To answer this, it’s useful to assess the liability side of the Fed’s balance sheet to understand where the fresh digitally printed money ends up after buying a U.S. Treasury security. The most notable growth in liabilities under COVID-era quantitative easing (QE) were bank reserves (+$2trn) and the reverse repo facility (RRP) (+$2.3trn). Under the Fed’s current QT program, declines in the RRP have accounted for most of the “money drain” from the system4.

The RRP is perceived as a measure of “excess’ liquidity meaning there are more dollars in short term vehicles—primarily money market funds—than there are supply of Treasury bills in the open market, and thus Treasury collateral is provided at the Fed via the RRP. However, as the Fed’s balance sheet continues to shrink, the RRP is well on its way to zero. Given this, a continuation of QT could last another three months without hiccup; thereafter, most of the decline in liquidity is likely to be seen in falling bank reserves.

At the beginning of 2019, Fed Governor Waller noted that bank reserves of roughly 10-11% of GDP might be sufficient. Bank reserves as a % of GDP are currently at these levels, suggesting the Fed is poised to end QT sometime in 1H2025 once RRP drainage is complete. Should the level of reserves fall below this threshold, however, its likely to lead to volatility in short term rates. Simply put, when there is enough short-term money/liquidity in the system, short term rates tend to be well behaved; when there isn’t, overnight rates are at risk of spiking. 

For investors, the Fed is committed to maintaining an ample reserves regime because it promotes market stability and allows the committee the flexibility to react. Moreover, the balance sheet has increasingly been viewed by Fed members as somewhat independent to the direction of monetary policy. Currently the Fed is cutting rates while continuing QT, so hypothetically they could hike rates with QE if they needed to address market functioning and inflation at the same time. Importantly, regardless of the direction policy needs to go next year, they can only be successful if the market is functioning as intended. Hence, they should learn from their mistakes in 2019 and consider ending QT a bit earlier especially given fiscal policy uncertainty next year.

 

1 The Fed's reverse repo rate is the interest rate paid to market participants who lend cash to the Fed in exchange for Treasury collateral. In a reverse repo, the Fed sells a security to a counterparty and agrees to buy it back at a specified price and time in the future.

2 On September 19, the day after the FOMC meeting, the Fed implemented a 5-basis-point technical adjustment to the two administered rates: the interest rate on excess reserves (IOER) was lowered to 20 basis points below the top of the target range and the ON RRP rate was lowered to 5 basis points below the bottom of the target range. By moving IOER lower in the target range, the Fed reduced the risk of EFFR moving above the top of the range.

3 As of November 14, 2024.

4 Bank reserves have been stable at roughly $3.2 trillion while the RRP is currently at ~$200bn as of November 14, 2024. 

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

This website is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purposes. By receiving this communication you agree with the intended purpose described above. Any examples used in this material are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. None of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, its affiliates or representatives is suggesting that the recipient or any other person take a specific course of action or any action at all. Communications such as this are not impartial and are provided in connection with the advertising and marketing of products and services. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, an investor should seek individualized advice from personal financial, legal, tax and other professionals that take into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of an investor's own situation.

 

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. Investment Advisory Services provided by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING MUTUAL FUNDS/ETF: Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives and risks as well as charges and expenses of a mutual fund or ETF before investing. The summary and full prospectuses contain this and other information about the mutual fund or ETF and should be read carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus for Mutual Funds: Contact JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. at 1-800-480-4111 or download it from this site. Exchange Traded Funds: Call 1-844-4JPM-ETF or download it from this site.

 

J.P. Morgan Funds and J.P. Morgan ETFs are distributed by JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc., which is an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Affiliates of JPMorgan Chase & Co. receive fees for providing various services to the funds. JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. is a member of FINRA FINRA's BrokerCheck

 

INFORMATION REGARDING COMMINGLED FUNDS: For additional information regarding the Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., please contact your J.P. Morgan Asset Management representative.

 

The Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. are collective trust funds established and maintained by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. under a declaration of trust. The funds are not required to file a prospectus or registration statement with the SEC, and accordingly, neither is available. The funds are available only to certain qualified retirement plans and governmental plans and is not offered to the general public. Units of the funds are not bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by any bank, government entity, the FDIC or any other type of deposit insurance. You should carefully consider the investment objectives, risk, charges, and expenses of the fund before investing.

 

INFORMATION FOR ALL SITE USERS: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

 

NOT FDIC INSURED | NO BANK GUARANTEE | MAY LOSE VALUE

 

Telephone calls and electronic communications may be monitored and/or recorded.

 

Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://www.jpmorgan.com/privacy.

 

If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

 

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

 

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

 

Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.