How would the U.S. dollar respond to a Trade War 2.0?

Gabriela Santos

Global Market Strategist

Marina Valentini

Global Market Strategist

Published: 10/30/2024
Listen now
00:00

Hello, my name is Marina Valentini and I am a Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Today's question asks "How would the US dollar respond to a trade war 2.0?" With the U.S. elections just a week away and polls indicating a tight race, investors are closely assessing potential impacts for currency markets. Trade policies remain in sharp focus, as the prospect for higher tariffs could strengthen the dollar. While both candidates have signaled a tough stance on China, Trump has proposed a potential universal 10% tariff and up to 60% tariffs on Chinese imports, pointing to a stricter approach[1].

The 2018-19 trade war offers key insights into how tariffs impact FX markets. During this period, the Trump administration raised tariffs on approximately $370 billion of Chinese goods from an average of 3% to 19%, prompting Chinese retaliation that raised tariffs on US exports from 7% to 21%. While other factors influenced currency movements, trade policy uncertainty tended to bolster the dollar, with the DXY index rising up to 10% during tariff announcement windows in 2018 and 4% in 2019. Additional forces impacting currencies included the Fed's rate hikes in 2018 and subsequent cuts in 2019, weaker growth outlooks in China and Europe and Brexit negotiations.

Meanwhile, the Chinese renminbi depreciated by up to 10% in 2018 and 5% in 2019 as trade talks ebbed and flowed. The PBOC allowed the CNY, which operates within a semi-fixed exchange rate regime, to devalue through controlled FX mechanisms. A weaker CNY partially cushioned the impact of tariffs by making Chinese exports relatively cheaper and preserving their competitiveness in the global market. However, it led the US to label China as a “currency manipulator” in 2019, generating additional FX volatility.

Global trade uncertainty also impacted other G10 and EM currencies. The EUR depreciated by up to 10% in 2018 and 4% in 2019, while other major trading partners like the MXN dropped by as much as 14% and 6%. Currencies linked to commodities and China, such as the CLP, COP, ZAR and BRL were particularly affected. 

Ultimately, the potential impact of a Trade War 2.0 on currencies depends on the scope and execution of any new tariffs. There remains significant uncertainty surrounding the approach a Trump administration would take, including whether a tariff strategy would be targeted in nature to negotiate trade terms and protect intellectual property, or used as a broad-based revenue offset for other policy items. Regardless, trade tensions will only be one piece of the puzzle driving currency markets. Other factors, particularly interest rate differentials[2], remain crucial to the USD's trajectory against major currencies like the EUR and GBP, which recovered to below their peak 2019 levels within seven months. Investors should remain mindful of risks for more impacted EM currencies, with most taking over three years to return to peak levels, and some, like the CNY, never fully recovering. 

Trade policies remain in sharp focus, as the prospect for higher tariffs could strengthen the dollar.

With the U.S. elections just a week away and polls indicating a a tight race, investors are closely assessing potential impacts for currency markets. Trade policies remain in sharp focus, as the prospect for higher tariffs could strengthen the dollar. While both candidates have signaled a tough stance on China, Trump has proposed a potential universal 10% tariff and up to 60% tariffs on Chinese imports, pointing to a stricter approach.

The 2018-19 trade war offers key insights into how tariffs impact FX markets. During this period, the Trump administration raised tariffs on approximately $370 billion of Chinese goods from an average of 3% to 19%, prompting Chinese retaliation that raised tariffs on US exports from 7% to 21%. While other factors influenced currency movements, trade policy uncertainty tended to bolster the dollar, with the DXY index rising up to 10% during tariff announcement windows in 2018 and 4% in 2019. Additional forces impacting currencies included the Fed's rate hikes in 2018 and subsequent cuts in 2019, weaker growth outlooks in China and Europe and Brexit negotiations.

Meanwhile, the Chinese renminbi depreciated by up to 10% in 2018 and 5% in 2019 as trade talks ebbed and flowed. The PBOC allowed the CNY, which operates within a semi-fixed exchange rate regime, to devalue through controlled FX mechanisms. A weaker CNY partially cushioned the impact of tariffs by making Chinese exports relatively cheaper and preserving their competitiveness in the global market. However, it led the US to label China as a “currency manipulator” in 2019, generating additional FX volatility.

Global trade uncertainty also impacted other G10 and EM currencies. The EUR depreciated by up to 10% in 2018 and 4% in 2019, while other major trading partners like the MXN dropped by as much as 14% and 6%. Currencies linked to commodities and China, such as the CLP, COP, ZAR and BRL were particularly affected. 

Ultimately, the potential impact of a Trade War 2.0 on currencies depends on the scope and execution of any new tariffs. There remains significant uncertainty surrounding the approach a Trump administration would take, including whether a tariff strategy would be targeted in nature to negotiate trade terms and protect intellectual property, or used as a broad-based revenue offset for other policy items. Regardless, trade tensions will only be one piece of the puzzle driving currency markets. Other factors, particularly interest rate differentials, remain crucial to the USD's trajectory against major currencies like the EUR and GBP, which recovered to below their peak 2019 levels within seven months. Investors should remain mindful of risks for more impacted EM currencies, with most taking over three years to return to peak levels, and some, like the CNY, never fully recovering. 

FX performance during 2018 and 2019 U.S. tariff annoucements

Maximum appreciation or depreciation around tariff announcement windows, % vs. USD*

Maximum appreciation or depreciation around tariff announcement windows, % vs. USD*

Source: FactSet, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. *Excluding DXY index which compares the USD vs. currencies of major U.S. trading partners. The columns show maximum appreciation from trough to peak or depreciation from peak to trough during the tariff announcement windows. The dates used for the tariff announcement windows are January 22, 2018 to December 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019 to December 13, 2019. 

09in243010134018
Gabriela Santos

Global Market Strategist

Marina Valentini

Global Market Strategist

Published: 10/30/2024
Listen now
00:00

Hello, my name is Marina Valentini and I am a Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Today's question asks "How would the US dollar respond to a trade war 2.0?" With the U.S. elections just a week away and polls indicating a tight race, investors are closely assessing potential impacts for currency markets. Trade policies remain in sharp focus, as the prospect for higher tariffs could strengthen the dollar. While both candidates have signaled a tough stance on China, Trump has proposed a potential universal 10% tariff and up to 60% tariffs on Chinese imports, pointing to a stricter approach[1].

The 2018-19 trade war offers key insights into how tariffs impact FX markets. During this period, the Trump administration raised tariffs on approximately $370 billion of Chinese goods from an average of 3% to 19%, prompting Chinese retaliation that raised tariffs on US exports from 7% to 21%. While other factors influenced currency movements, trade policy uncertainty tended to bolster the dollar, with the DXY index rising up to 10% during tariff announcement windows in 2018 and 4% in 2019. Additional forces impacting currencies included the Fed's rate hikes in 2018 and subsequent cuts in 2019, weaker growth outlooks in China and Europe and Brexit negotiations.

Meanwhile, the Chinese renminbi depreciated by up to 10% in 2018 and 5% in 2019 as trade talks ebbed and flowed. The PBOC allowed the CNY, which operates within a semi-fixed exchange rate regime, to devalue through controlled FX mechanisms. A weaker CNY partially cushioned the impact of tariffs by making Chinese exports relatively cheaper and preserving their competitiveness in the global market. However, it led the US to label China as a “currency manipulator” in 2019, generating additional FX volatility.

Global trade uncertainty also impacted other G10 and EM currencies. The EUR depreciated by up to 10% in 2018 and 4% in 2019, while other major trading partners like the MXN dropped by as much as 14% and 6%. Currencies linked to commodities and China, such as the CLP, COP, ZAR and BRL were particularly affected. 

Ultimately, the potential impact of a Trade War 2.0 on currencies depends on the scope and execution of any new tariffs. There remains significant uncertainty surrounding the approach a Trump administration would take, including whether a tariff strategy would be targeted in nature to negotiate trade terms and protect intellectual property, or used as a broad-based revenue offset for other policy items. Regardless, trade tensions will only be one piece of the puzzle driving currency markets. Other factors, particularly interest rate differentials[2], remain crucial to the USD's trajectory against major currencies like the EUR and GBP, which recovered to below their peak 2019 levels within seven months. Investors should remain mindful of risks for more impacted EM currencies, with most taking over three years to return to peak levels, and some, like the CNY, never fully recovering. 

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

This website is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purposes. By receiving this communication you agree with the intended purpose described above. Any examples used in this material are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. None of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, its affiliates or representatives is suggesting that the recipient or any other person take a specific course of action or any action at all. Communications such as this are not impartial and are provided in connection with the advertising and marketing of products and services. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, an investor should seek individualized advice from personal financial, legal, tax and other professionals that take into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of an investor's own situation.

 

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. Investment Advisory Services provided by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING MUTUAL FUNDS/ETF: Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives and risks as well as charges and expenses of a mutual fund or ETF before investing. The summary and full prospectuses contain this and other information about the mutual fund or ETF and should be read carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus for Mutual Funds: Contact JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. at 1-800-480-4111 or download it from this site. Exchange Traded Funds: Call 1-844-4JPM-ETF or download it from this site.

 

J.P. Morgan Funds and J.P. Morgan ETFs are distributed by JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc., which is an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Affiliates of JPMorgan Chase & Co. receive fees for providing various services to the funds. JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. is a member of FINRA FINRA's BrokerCheck

 

INFORMATION REGARDING COMMINGLED FUNDS: For additional information regarding the Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., please contact your J.P. Morgan Asset Management representative.

 

The Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. are collective trust funds established and maintained by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. under a declaration of trust. The funds are not required to file a prospectus or registration statement with the SEC, and accordingly, neither is available. The funds are available only to certain qualified retirement plans and governmental plans and is not offered to the general public. Units of the funds are not bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by any bank, government entity, the FDIC or any other type of deposit insurance. You should carefully consider the investment objectives, risk, charges, and expenses of the fund before investing.

 

INFORMATION FOR ALL SITE USERS: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

 

NOT FDIC INSURED | NO BANK GUARANTEE | MAY LOSE VALUE

 

Telephone calls and electronic communications may be monitored and/or recorded.

 

Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://www.jpmorgan.com/privacy.

 

If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

 

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

 

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

 

Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.