How vulnerable is mega-cap tech to tariff turmoil?

Stephanie Aliaga

Global Market Strategist

Published: 04/09/2025
Listen now
00:00

Hi, my name is Stephanie Aliaga and I am a Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Welcome to On the Minds of Investors. Today's blog answers the question "How vulnerable is mega-cap tech to tariff turmoil?" Over the past two years, a small group of mega-cap tech stocks hasn’t just led—they’ve defined the market. The Magnificent Seven became the center of gravity for performance, sentiment and allocation. But in 2025, that gravitational pull is becoming a point of vulnerability. Doubts around the durability of the AI capex cycle—particularly in the wake of DeepSeek—splashed cold water on AI enthusiasm. And now, rising trade tensions are pressuring the global supply chains at the heart of their business models.

Caught in the crosshairs of a trade war

The Trump administration’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs have sent shockwaves through global markets. While intended to level the playing field, these measures have placed significant pressure on America’s leading tech companies.

Up to 75% of the Mag 7’s suppliers are located overseas, particularly in East and Southeast Asia. Apple relies heavily on Chinese and Vietnamese facilities for iPhone assembly1, Nvidia and AMD depend on Taiwanese and Korean fabs for chip production, and Tesla imports EV components from China—even for its U.S. production lines.

These companies don’t just build abroad, they sell there too. Apple, Microsoft, Google and others generate over half of their revenue overseas2.

Tariffs could squeeze margins and hamper innovation. Electronics, semiconductors, server infrastructure—all areas dominated by the Mag 7—are at the center of the new tariff lists. Capital expenditures may also slow, with steel, aluminum and copper tariffs increasing the cost of the data center buildout.

Foreign retaliation adds another layer of risk. The EU and China have weighed retaliation by targeting the massive U.S. services trade surplus—largely driven by U.S. tech companies3.

Markets recalibrate risk and earnings potential

So far, the pullback hasn’t been triggered by collapsing fundamentals, but a repricing of risk. Investors are reassessing margins, capex and earnings potential in a more uncertain environment, and valuation compression has followed. The forward P/E ratio for the Mag 7 has declined to ~22x from 31x at the start of the year, marking the cheapest levels since January 2023—before the AI investment theme even gained traction.

This may look like a bargain, but the next big test will be earnings. Economists have downgraded GDP expectations to 0-1% for 2025, and the pass-through of a weaker growth outlook has yet to materialize in 2025 earnings expectations4. The Q1 season will involve more cautious guidance from management teams, with analyst downgrades likely to follow.

Investor positioning: From all-in to rebalance

Market concentration, once a tailwind for performance, has become a liability in a more uncertain environment and a key driver of market rotation. The mega-cap tech companies remain at the forefront of innovation, but they are not a monolith and remain highly exposed to global policy shocks. For investors, the playbook isn’t to abandon the cohort, but to manage your exposure, protect portfolios against downside risk and keep an eye on where leadership is headed next—as beyond the trade headlines, AI advancement is rapidly progressing.

1 According to some tech analysts, an iPhone could cost $3,5000 if produced in the U.S.— triple the price.

2 Source: FactSet GeoRev.

3 According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. had a services trade surplus of $280 billion in 2023, with digitally enabled services accounting for 64% of all U.S. services exports.

4 As of 4/7/25, Mag 7 FY 2025 earnings expectation had barely come down to 16.6% from 16.9% expected a month prior, as analysts await fresh guidance post-tariff developments to make significant revisions. 

The mega-cap tech companies remain at the forefront of innovation, but they are not a monolith and remain highly exposed to global policy shocks.

Over the past two years, a small group of mega-cap tech stocks hasn’t just led—they’ve defined the market. The Magnificent Seven became the center of gravity for performance, sentiment and allocation. But in 2025, that gravitational pull is becoming a point of vulnerability. Doubts around the durability of the AI capex cycle—particularly in the wake of DeepSeek—splashed cold water on AI enthusiasm. And now, rising trade tensions are pressuring the global supply chains at the heart of their business models.

Caught in the crosshairs of a trade war

The Trump administration’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs have sent shockwaves through global markets. While intended to level the playing field, these measures have placed significant pressure on America’s leading tech companies.

  • Up to 75% of the Mag 7’s suppliers are located overseas, particularly in East and Southeast Asia. Apple relies heavily on Chinese and Vietnamese facilities for iPhone assembly1, Nvidia and AMD depend on Taiwanese and Korean fabs for chip production and Tesla imports EV components from China—even for its U.S. production lines.
  • These companies don’t just build abroad, they sell there too. Apple, Microsoft, Google and others generate over half of their revenue overseas2.
  • Tariffs could squeeze margins and hamper innovation. Electronics, semiconductors, server infrastructure—all areas dominated by the Mag 7—are at the center of the new tariff lists. Capital expenditures may also slow, with steel, aluminum and copper tariffs increasing the cost of the data center buildout.
  • Foreign retaliation adds another layer of risk. The EU and China have weighed retaliation by targeting the massive U.S. services trade surplus—largely driven by U.S. tech companies3.

Markets recalibrate risk and earnings potential

So far, the pullback hasn’t been triggered by collapsing fundamentals, but a repricing of risk. Investors are reassessing margins, capex and earnings potential in a more uncertain environment, and valuation compression has followed. The forward P/E ratio for the Mag 7 has declined to ~22x from 31x at the start of the year, marking the cheapest levels since January 2023—before the AI investment theme even gained traction.

This may look like a bargain, but the next big test will be earnings. Economists have downgraded GDP expectations to 0-1% for 2025, and the pass-through of a weaker growth outlook has yet to materialize in 2025 earnings expectations4. The Q1 season will involve more cautious guidance from management teams, with analyst downgrades likely to follow.

Investor positioning: From all-in to rebalance

Market concentration, once a tailwind for performance, has become a liability in a more uncertain environment and a key driver of market rotation. The mega-cap tech companies remain at the forefront of innovation, but they are not a monolith and remain highly exposed to global policy shocks. For investors, the playbook isn’t to abandon the cohort, but to manage your exposure, protect portfolios against downside risk and keep an eye on where leadership is headed next—as beyond the trade headlines, AI advancement is rapidly progressing.

Mag 7 valuations are at their lowest levels since January 2023, pending new earnings guidance

Weighted P/E ratio, next 12 months

Weighted P/E ratio, next 12 months

Source: FactSet, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data are as of April 7, 2025. 

1 According to some tech analysts, an iPhone could cost $3,5000 if produced in the U.S.— triple the price.
2 Source: FactSet GeoRev.
3 According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. had a services trade surplus of $280 billion in 2023, with digitally enabled services accounting for 64% of all U.S. services exports.
4 As of 4/7/25, Mag 7 FY 2025 earnings expectation had barely come down to 16.6% from 16.9% expected a month prior, as analysts await fresh guidance post-tariff developments to make significant revisions. 
09tk250904112222
Stephanie Aliaga

Global Market Strategist

Published: 04/09/2025
Listen now
00:00

Hi, my name is Stephanie Aliaga and I am a Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Welcome to On the Minds of Investors. Today's blog answers the question "How vulnerable is mega-cap tech to tariff turmoil?" Over the past two years, a small group of mega-cap tech stocks hasn’t just led—they’ve defined the market. The Magnificent Seven became the center of gravity for performance, sentiment and allocation. But in 2025, that gravitational pull is becoming a point of vulnerability. Doubts around the durability of the AI capex cycle—particularly in the wake of DeepSeek—splashed cold water on AI enthusiasm. And now, rising trade tensions are pressuring the global supply chains at the heart of their business models.

Caught in the crosshairs of a trade war

The Trump administration’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs have sent shockwaves through global markets. While intended to level the playing field, these measures have placed significant pressure on America’s leading tech companies.

Up to 75% of the Mag 7’s suppliers are located overseas, particularly in East and Southeast Asia. Apple relies heavily on Chinese and Vietnamese facilities for iPhone assembly1, Nvidia and AMD depend on Taiwanese and Korean fabs for chip production, and Tesla imports EV components from China—even for its U.S. production lines.

These companies don’t just build abroad, they sell there too. Apple, Microsoft, Google and others generate over half of their revenue overseas2.

Tariffs could squeeze margins and hamper innovation. Electronics, semiconductors, server infrastructure—all areas dominated by the Mag 7—are at the center of the new tariff lists. Capital expenditures may also slow, with steel, aluminum and copper tariffs increasing the cost of the data center buildout.

Foreign retaliation adds another layer of risk. The EU and China have weighed retaliation by targeting the massive U.S. services trade surplus—largely driven by U.S. tech companies3.

Markets recalibrate risk and earnings potential

So far, the pullback hasn’t been triggered by collapsing fundamentals, but a repricing of risk. Investors are reassessing margins, capex and earnings potential in a more uncertain environment, and valuation compression has followed. The forward P/E ratio for the Mag 7 has declined to ~22x from 31x at the start of the year, marking the cheapest levels since January 2023—before the AI investment theme even gained traction.

This may look like a bargain, but the next big test will be earnings. Economists have downgraded GDP expectations to 0-1% for 2025, and the pass-through of a weaker growth outlook has yet to materialize in 2025 earnings expectations4. The Q1 season will involve more cautious guidance from management teams, with analyst downgrades likely to follow.

Investor positioning: From all-in to rebalance

Market concentration, once a tailwind for performance, has become a liability in a more uncertain environment and a key driver of market rotation. The mega-cap tech companies remain at the forefront of innovation, but they are not a monolith and remain highly exposed to global policy shocks. For investors, the playbook isn’t to abandon the cohort, but to manage your exposure, protect portfolios against downside risk and keep an eye on where leadership is headed next—as beyond the trade headlines, AI advancement is rapidly progressing.

1 According to some tech analysts, an iPhone could cost $3,5000 if produced in the U.S.— triple the price.

2 Source: FactSet GeoRev.

3 According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. had a services trade surplus of $280 billion in 2023, with digitally enabled services accounting for 64% of all U.S. services exports.

4 As of 4/7/25, Mag 7 FY 2025 earnings expectation had barely come down to 16.6% from 16.9% expected a month prior, as analysts await fresh guidance post-tariff developments to make significant revisions. 

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

This website is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purposes. By receiving this communication you agree with the intended purpose described above. Any examples used in this material are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. None of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, its affiliates or representatives is suggesting that the recipient or any other person take a specific course of action or any action at all. Communications such as this are not impartial and are provided in connection with the advertising and marketing of products and services. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, an investor should seek individualized advice from personal financial, legal, tax and other professionals that take into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of an investor's own situation.

 

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. Investment Advisory Services provided by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING MUTUAL FUNDS/ETF: Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives and risks as well as charges and expenses of a mutual fund or ETF before investing. The summary and full prospectuses contain this and other information about the mutual fund or ETF and should be read carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus for Mutual Funds: Contact JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. at 1-800-480-4111 or download it from this site. Exchange Traded Funds: Call 1-844-4JPM-ETF or download it from this site.

 

J.P. Morgan Funds and J.P. Morgan ETFs are distributed by JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc., which is an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Affiliates of JPMorgan Chase & Co. receive fees for providing various services to the funds. JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. is a member of FINRA FINRA's BrokerCheck

 

INFORMATION REGARDING COMMINGLED FUNDS: For additional information regarding the Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., please contact your J.P. Morgan Asset Management representative.

 

The Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. are collective trust funds established and maintained by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. under a declaration of trust. The funds are not required to file a prospectus or registration statement with the SEC, and accordingly, neither is available. The funds are available only to certain qualified retirement plans and governmental plans and is not offered to the general public. Units of the funds are not bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by any bank, government entity, the FDIC or any other type of deposit insurance. You should carefully consider the investment objectives, risk, charges, and expenses of the fund before investing.

 

INFORMATION FOR ALL SITE USERS: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

 

NOT FDIC INSURED | NO BANK GUARANTEE | MAY LOSE VALUE

 

Telephone calls and electronic communications may be monitored and/or recorded.

 

Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://www.jpmorgan.com/privacy.

 

If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

 

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

 

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

 

Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.