How might China respond to escalating trade tensions with the U.S.?

Published: 02/05/2025
Listen now
00:00

Hi my name is Mary park Durham and welcome to On the Minds of Investors. Today's post is titled "How might China respond to escalating trade tensions with the U.S.?" After a stimulus-fueled rally in 3Q24, Chinese equities have recently stumbled, declining 3.2% since the U.S. election1. Domestically, challenges like policy uncertainty and real estate sluggishness persist, while externally, new risks are emerging. President Trump has intensified pressure on China by imposing an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods and initiating an investigation into its trade practices and compliance with the 2020 Phase One Deal, with an April 1st deadline. Recent events indicate that tariffs are being used as negotiating leverage, suggesting the situation will keep evolving.

As we brace for what’s next, it’s worth revisiting the 2018-2019 “Trade War” when U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports rose from 3% to 10% by early 2020. China’s playbook could include:

Retaliatory tariffs: During Trade War 1.0, China responded with multiple rounds of retaliatory tariffs, tripling its tariff rate on U.S. imports over a two-year period. This time, China has responded by filing a case with the World Trade Organization, a largely symbolic gesture given the WTO dispute settlement system is defunct. It also plans to impose tariffs on U.S. energy imports and other items starting February 10th, which allows time for negotiation.

Currency depreciation and export diversification: From peak to trough within the trade war period, the CNY depreciated by 16% vs. the USD, helping offset the impact of tariffs and facilitating trade diversification toward other markets. For example, ASEAN gained 3ppts of China’s export share from 2019-2023. However, further depreciation is constrained, with the USDCNY now at 7.19 compared to 6.51 at the start of 2018, and the PBoC showing reduced tolerance for currency weakening due to capital outflow pressures.

Export restrictions and U.S. company crackdowns: China has 50% market share in the global production of cobalt, lithium, and nickel and 75% in electric batteries and solar cells. Therefore, it holds substantial leverage over other countries. In response to U.S. tariffs, China plans to expand key mineral export controls and has launched an antitrust probe into Google, indicating potential challenges for U.S. businesses operating in China.

Fiscal stimulus: A 20%+ effective tariff rate could hurt China’s GDP growth, due to lower investment, consumption, and spillover effects from reduced business confidence. This, along with existing challenges, could require increased fiscal stimulus in 2025.

Presidents Trump and Xi are expected to speak this week, which could ease tensions. However, uncertainty surrounding the permanence of tariffs may continue to cause short-term volatility in Chinese and U.S. assets. While supply chains have been significantly restructured due to Trade War 1.0 and COVID-19, enhancing companies' resilience to higher tariffs, some are still vulnerable. For example, large-cap U.S. tech firms derive approximately 14% of their revenues and 16% of their inputs from China, making them more exposed in the case of broad retaliatory tariffs. Meanwhile, Chinese companies generate 87% of their revenues domestically and only 3% from the U.S1. Thus, fiscal stimulus remains the most important driver for Chinese equities, with higher tariffs possibly prompting more government action. Overall, broad diversification is essential while leaders work to resolve trade challenges.

1 Based on MSCI China Total Return Index in USD.

From peak to trough within the trade war period, the CNY depreciated by 16% vs. the USD, helping offset the impact of tariffs and facilitating trade diversification toward other markets.

After a stimulus-fueled rally in 3Q24, Chinese equities have recently stumbled, declining 3.2% since the U.S. election1. Domestically, challenges like policy uncertainty and real estate sluggishness persist, while externally, new risks are emerging. President Trump has intensified pressure on China by imposing an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods and initiating an investigation into its trade practices and compliance with the 2020 Phase One Deal, with an April 1st deadline. Recent events indicate that tariffs are being used as negotiating leverage, suggesting the situation will keep evolving.

As we brace for what’s next, it’s worth revisiting the 2018-2019 “Trade War” when U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports rose from 3% to 10% by early 2020. China’s playbook could include:

  • Retaliatory tariffs: During Trade War 1.0, China responded with multiple rounds of retaliatory tariffs, tripling its tariff rate on U.S. imports over a two-year period. This time, China has responded by filing a case with the World Trade Organization, a largely symbolic gesture given the WTO dispute settlement system is defunct. It also plans to impose tariffs on U.S. energy imports and other items starting February 10th, which allows time for negotiation.
  • Currency depreciation and export diversification: From peak to trough within the trade war period, the CNY depreciated by 16% vs. the USD, helping offset the impact of tariffs and facilitating trade diversification toward other markets. For example, ASEAN gained 3ppts of China’s export share from 2019-2023. However, further depreciation is constrained, with the USDCNY now at 7.19 compared to 6.51 at the start of 2018, and the PBoC showing reduced tolerance for currency weakening due to capital outflow pressures.
  • Export restrictions and U.S. company crackdowns: China has 50% market share in the global production of cobalt, lithium, and nickel and 75% in electric batteries and solar cells. Therefore, it holds substantial leverage over other countries. In response to U.S. tariffs, China plans to expand key mineral export controls and has launched an antitrust probe into Google, indicating potential challenges for U.S. businesses operating in China.
  • Fiscal stimulus: A 20%+ effective tariff rate could hurt China’s GDP growth, due to lower investment, consumption, and spillover effects from reduced business confidence. This, along with existing challenges, could require increased fiscal stimulus in 2025.

Presidents Trump and Xi are expected to speak this week, which could ease tensions. However, uncertainty surrounding the permanence of tariffs may continue to cause short-term volatility in Chinese and U.S. assets. While supply chains have been significantly restructured due to Trade War 1.0 and COVID-19, enhancing companies' resilience to higher tariffs, some are still vulnerable. For example, large-cap U.S. tech firms derive approximately 14% of their revenues and 16% of their inputs from China, making them more exposed in the case of broad retaliatory tariffs. Meanwhile, Chinese companies generate 87% of their revenues domestically and only 3% from the U.S1. Thus, fiscal stimulus remains the most important driver for Chinese equities, with higher tariffs possibly prompting more government action. Overall, broad diversification is essential while leaders work to resolve trade challenges.

The yuan depreciated throughout the 2018-2019 Trade War

U.S. tariff rate on imports for consumption from China and USDCNY

U.S. tariff rate on imports for consumption from China and USDCNY

Source: FactSet, U.S. International Trade Commission, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Labels refer to when the tariffs were announced, and thus, would precede the actual implemented increase in tariffs. Various tariffs on solar panels and washing machines were announced in Jan. 2018, 25% tariff on steel and 10% on aluminum were announced in Mar. 2018, 25% tariff on Lists 1&2 was announced in Jun. 2018, 10% tariff on List 3 was announced in Sep. 2018, 25% tariff on List 3 was announced in May 2019 (initially set at 10%), 15% tariff on List 4A was announced in Aug. 2019. A temporary truce was announced in Dec. 2018 at the G20 summit. Phase 1 deal was officially announced in Dec. 2019 and signed in Jan. 2020.

1 Based on MSCI China Total Return Index in USD.
09aw250502111502
Published: 02/05/2025
Listen now
00:00

Hi my name is Mary park Durham and welcome to On the Minds of Investors. Today's post is titled "How might China respond to escalating trade tensions with the U.S.?" After a stimulus-fueled rally in 3Q24, Chinese equities have recently stumbled, declining 3.2% since the U.S. election1. Domestically, challenges like policy uncertainty and real estate sluggishness persist, while externally, new risks are emerging. President Trump has intensified pressure on China by imposing an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods and initiating an investigation into its trade practices and compliance with the 2020 Phase One Deal, with an April 1st deadline. Recent events indicate that tariffs are being used as negotiating leverage, suggesting the situation will keep evolving.

As we brace for what’s next, it’s worth revisiting the 2018-2019 “Trade War” when U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports rose from 3% to 10% by early 2020. China’s playbook could include:

Retaliatory tariffs: During Trade War 1.0, China responded with multiple rounds of retaliatory tariffs, tripling its tariff rate on U.S. imports over a two-year period. This time, China has responded by filing a case with the World Trade Organization, a largely symbolic gesture given the WTO dispute settlement system is defunct. It also plans to impose tariffs on U.S. energy imports and other items starting February 10th, which allows time for negotiation.

Currency depreciation and export diversification: From peak to trough within the trade war period, the CNY depreciated by 16% vs. the USD, helping offset the impact of tariffs and facilitating trade diversification toward other markets. For example, ASEAN gained 3ppts of China’s export share from 2019-2023. However, further depreciation is constrained, with the USDCNY now at 7.19 compared to 6.51 at the start of 2018, and the PBoC showing reduced tolerance for currency weakening due to capital outflow pressures.

Export restrictions and U.S. company crackdowns: China has 50% market share in the global production of cobalt, lithium, and nickel and 75% in electric batteries and solar cells. Therefore, it holds substantial leverage over other countries. In response to U.S. tariffs, China plans to expand key mineral export controls and has launched an antitrust probe into Google, indicating potential challenges for U.S. businesses operating in China.

Fiscal stimulus: A 20%+ effective tariff rate could hurt China’s GDP growth, due to lower investment, consumption, and spillover effects from reduced business confidence. This, along with existing challenges, could require increased fiscal stimulus in 2025.

Presidents Trump and Xi are expected to speak this week, which could ease tensions. However, uncertainty surrounding the permanence of tariffs may continue to cause short-term volatility in Chinese and U.S. assets. While supply chains have been significantly restructured due to Trade War 1.0 and COVID-19, enhancing companies' resilience to higher tariffs, some are still vulnerable. For example, large-cap U.S. tech firms derive approximately 14% of their revenues and 16% of their inputs from China, making them more exposed in the case of broad retaliatory tariffs. Meanwhile, Chinese companies generate 87% of their revenues domestically and only 3% from the U.S1. Thus, fiscal stimulus remains the most important driver for Chinese equities, with higher tariffs possibly prompting more government action. Overall, broad diversification is essential while leaders work to resolve trade challenges.

1 Based on MSCI China Total Return Index in USD.

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

This website is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purposes. By receiving this communication you agree with the intended purpose described above. Any examples used in this material are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. None of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, its affiliates or representatives is suggesting that the recipient or any other person take a specific course of action or any action at all. Communications such as this are not impartial and are provided in connection with the advertising and marketing of products and services. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, an investor should seek individualized advice from personal financial, legal, tax and other professionals that take into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of an investor's own situation.

 

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. Investment Advisory Services provided by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING MUTUAL FUNDS/ETF: Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives and risks as well as charges and expenses of a mutual fund or ETF before investing. The summary and full prospectuses contain this and other information about the mutual fund or ETF and should be read carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus for Mutual Funds: Contact JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. at 1-800-480-4111 or download it from this site. Exchange Traded Funds: Call 1-844-4JPM-ETF or download it from this site.

 

J.P. Morgan Funds and J.P. Morgan ETFs are distributed by JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc., which is an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Affiliates of JPMorgan Chase & Co. receive fees for providing various services to the funds. JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. is a member of  

 

INFORMATION REGARDING COMMINGLED FUNDS: For additional information regarding the Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., please contact your J.P. Morgan Asset Management representative.

 

The Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. are collective trust funds established and maintained by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. under a declaration of trust. The funds are not required to file a prospectus or registration statement with the SEC, and accordingly, neither is available. The funds are available only to certain qualified retirement plans and governmental plans and is not offered to the general public. Units of the funds are not bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by any bank, government entity, the FDIC or any other type of deposit insurance. You should carefully consider the investment objectives, risk, charges, and expenses of the fund before investing.

 

INFORMATION FOR ALL SITE USERS: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

 

NOT FDIC INSURED | NO BANK GUARANTEE | MAY LOSE VALUE

 

Telephone calls and electronic communications may be monitored and/or recorded.

 

Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://www.jpmorgan.com/privacy.

 

If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

 

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

 

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

 

Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.