Could regulatory shifts impact the dominance of Big Tech?

Stephanie Aliaga

Global Market Strategist

Published: 11/27/2024
Listen now
00:00

Hi, my name is Stephanie Aliaga, Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management and welcome to On the Minds of investors.. Today's blog answers the question "Could regulatory shifts impact the dominance of Big Tech?" The dominance of Big Tech in digital services has enabled them to scale and grow in unprecedented ways, but has also raised concerns about their expanding power. As the world becomes increasingly reliant on a handful of tech giants and AI technology advances rapidly, governments worldwide are intensifying regulatory efforts.

Google commands 89% of the global search engine market, Apple holds 51% of the U.S. mobile phone and tablet market, Microsoft powers 62% of desktop operating systems, and Facebook and Instagram together capture 57% of the social media market. With this stronghold, Big Tech wields significant influence in setting industry standards, shaping consumer behaviors and influencing public discourse.

In response, various proposals have been put forward, including antitrust actions, stricter data protection laws, and increased transparency requirements. The U.S. Department of Justice's recent antitrust case against Google marks a historic move against tech monopolies. After a landmark court ruling found the company monopolized the search market, the case could potentially require Google to divest parts of its business. Regulators have also scrutinized companies like Apple and Nvidia, while foreign governments are taking aim over U.S. dominance in digital markets.

The incoming Trump 2.0 administration will play a key role in shaping tech regulation. While uncertainty remains, early indications suggest:

  • AI Innovation over Regulation: Trump’s approach will likely be shaped by figures like Elon Musk, who emphasize the need for a freer environment for AI development that enables the U.S. to maintain its competitive edge. This likely involves undoing President Biden’s executive order on AI in favor of a more hands-off approach to regulation.
  • Evolving Antitrust Focus: The scrutiny on Big Tech’s market dominance will persist, but focus may shift towards issues like free speech and competitiveness rather than wholesale breakups of tech companies. FTC Commissioner Lina Khan will likely be replaced by someone with a less interventionist approach, slowing the pace of actions taken against Big Tech firms.
  • Semiconductor Independence from China: Trump could expand the semiconductor export restrictions introduced during the Biden administration and increase incentives for domestic chip manufacturing.
  • Loosening Cryptocurrency Guardrails: A friendlier stance on blockchain and digital currencies could reduce SEC enforcement and reshape the regulatory framework for digital assets. These efforts could attract investment and spur advancements, encouraging blockchain applications in various sectors.

For investors, the takeaways are clear: the regulatory landscape for Big Tech is set for change, but the potential challenges from antitrust enforcement and AI regulation may be less severe under Trump. Focus on semiconductor independence, tech advancement and U.S. exceptionalism could create new winners and losers, but these changes will be highly sensitive to policy developments and enforcement. As tech developments evolve, investors should remain vigilant to capitalize on emerging trends while mitigating concentration risks to those companies most scrutinized.

Google commands 89% of the global search engine market, Apple holds 51% of the U.S. mobile phone and tablet market, Microsoft powers 62% of desktop operating systems, and Facebook and Instagram together capture 57% of the social media market.

The dominance of Big Tech in digital services has enabled them to scale and grow in unprecedented ways, but has also raised concerns about their expanding power. As the world becomes increasingly reliant on a handful of tech giants and AI technology advances rapidly, governments worldwide are intensifying regulatory efforts.

Google commands 89% of the global search engine market, Apple holds 51% of the U.S. mobile phone and tablet market, Microsoft powers 62% of desktop operating systems and Facebook and Instagram together capture 57% of the social media market. With this stronghold, Big Tech wields significant influence in setting industry standards, shaping consumer behaviors and influencing public discourse.

In response, various proposals have been put forward, including antitrust actions, stricter data protection laws and increased transparency requirements. The U.S. Department of Justice's recent antitrust case against Google marks a historic move against tech monopolies. After a landmark court ruling found the company monopolized the search market, the case could potentially require Google to divest parts of its business. Regulators have also scrutinized companies like Apple and Nvidia, while foreign governments are taking aim over U.S. dominance in digital markets.

The incoming Trump 2.0 administration will play a key role in shaping tech regulation. While uncertainty remains, early indications suggest:

  • AI Innovation over Regulation: Trump’s approach will likely be shaped by figures like Elon Musk, who emphasize the need for a freer environment for AI development that enables the U.S. to maintain its competitive edge. This likely involves undoing President Biden’s executive order on AI in favor of a more hands-off approach to regulation.
  • Evolving Antitrust Focus: The scrutiny on Big Tech’s market dominance will persist, but focus may shift towards issues like free speech and competitiveness rather than wholesale breakups of tech companies. FTC Commissioner Lina Khan will likely be replaced by someone with a less interventionist approach, slowing the pace of actions taken against Big Tech firms.
  • Semiconductor Independence from China: Trump could expand the semiconductor export restrictions introduced during the Biden administration and increase incentives for domestic chip manufacturing.
  • Loosening Cryptocurrency Guardrails: A friendlier stance on blockchain and digital currencies could reduce SEC enforcement and reshape the regulatory framework for digital assets. These efforts could attract investment and spur advancements, encouraging blockchain applications in various sectors.

For investors, the takeaways are clear: the regulatory landscape for Big Tech is set for change, but the potential challenges from antitrust enforcement and AI regulation may be less severe under Trump. Focus on semiconductor independence, tech advancement and U.S. exceptionalism could create new winners and losers, but these changes will be highly sensitive to policy developments and enforcement. As tech developments evolve, investors should remain vigilant to capitalize on emerging trends while mitigating concentration risks to those companies most scrutinized.

Dominance of U.S. tech firms across digital markets will invite continued scrutiny

% share of respective market

% share of respective market

Source: Statcounter Global Stats, Statista, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. All data is from Statcounter and is as of October 2024 except for e-commerce, which is as of 2023 from Statista. Note that social media market share for Facebook includes Instagram. 

09ci242711170238
Stephanie Aliaga

Global Market Strategist

Published: 11/27/2024
Listen now
00:00

Hi, my name is Stephanie Aliaga, Global Market Strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management and welcome to On the Minds of investors.. Today's blog answers the question "Could regulatory shifts impact the dominance of Big Tech?" The dominance of Big Tech in digital services has enabled them to scale and grow in unprecedented ways, but has also raised concerns about their expanding power. As the world becomes increasingly reliant on a handful of tech giants and AI technology advances rapidly, governments worldwide are intensifying regulatory efforts.

Google commands 89% of the global search engine market, Apple holds 51% of the U.S. mobile phone and tablet market, Microsoft powers 62% of desktop operating systems, and Facebook and Instagram together capture 57% of the social media market. With this stronghold, Big Tech wields significant influence in setting industry standards, shaping consumer behaviors and influencing public discourse.

In response, various proposals have been put forward, including antitrust actions, stricter data protection laws, and increased transparency requirements. The U.S. Department of Justice's recent antitrust case against Google marks a historic move against tech monopolies. After a landmark court ruling found the company monopolized the search market, the case could potentially require Google to divest parts of its business. Regulators have also scrutinized companies like Apple and Nvidia, while foreign governments are taking aim over U.S. dominance in digital markets.

The incoming Trump 2.0 administration will play a key role in shaping tech regulation. While uncertainty remains, early indications suggest:

  • AI Innovation over Regulation: Trump’s approach will likely be shaped by figures like Elon Musk, who emphasize the need for a freer environment for AI development that enables the U.S. to maintain its competitive edge. This likely involves undoing President Biden’s executive order on AI in favor of a more hands-off approach to regulation.
  • Evolving Antitrust Focus: The scrutiny on Big Tech’s market dominance will persist, but focus may shift towards issues like free speech and competitiveness rather than wholesale breakups of tech companies. FTC Commissioner Lina Khan will likely be replaced by someone with a less interventionist approach, slowing the pace of actions taken against Big Tech firms.
  • Semiconductor Independence from China: Trump could expand the semiconductor export restrictions introduced during the Biden administration and increase incentives for domestic chip manufacturing.
  • Loosening Cryptocurrency Guardrails: A friendlier stance on blockchain and digital currencies could reduce SEC enforcement and reshape the regulatory framework for digital assets. These efforts could attract investment and spur advancements, encouraging blockchain applications in various sectors.

For investors, the takeaways are clear: the regulatory landscape for Big Tech is set for change, but the potential challenges from antitrust enforcement and AI regulation may be less severe under Trump. Focus on semiconductor independence, tech advancement and U.S. exceptionalism could create new winners and losers, but these changes will be highly sensitive to policy developments and enforcement. As tech developments evolve, investors should remain vigilant to capitalize on emerging trends while mitigating concentration risks to those companies most scrutinized.

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

This website is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purposes. By receiving this communication you agree with the intended purpose described above. Any examples used in this material are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. None of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, its affiliates or representatives is suggesting that the recipient or any other person take a specific course of action or any action at all. Communications such as this are not impartial and are provided in connection with the advertising and marketing of products and services. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, an investor should seek individualized advice from personal financial, legal, tax and other professionals that take into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of an investor's own situation.

 

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete. The views and strategies described may not be suitable for all investors.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. Investment Advisory Services provided by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING MUTUAL FUNDS/ETF: Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives and risks as well as charges and expenses of a mutual fund or ETF before investing. The summary and full prospectuses contain this and other information about the mutual fund or ETF and should be read carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus for Mutual Funds: Contact JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. at 1-800-480-4111 or download it from this site. Exchange Traded Funds: Call 1-844-4JPM-ETF or download it from this site.

 

J.P. Morgan Funds and J.P. Morgan ETFs are distributed by JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc., which is an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Affiliates of JPMorgan Chase & Co. receive fees for providing various services to the funds. JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. is a member of FINRA FINRA's BrokerCheck

 

INFORMATION REGARDING COMMINGLED FUNDS: For additional information regarding the Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., please contact your J.P. Morgan Asset Management representative.

 

The Commingled Pension Trust Funds of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. are collective trust funds established and maintained by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. under a declaration of trust. The funds are not required to file a prospectus or registration statement with the SEC, and accordingly, neither is available. The funds are available only to certain qualified retirement plans and governmental plans and is not offered to the general public. Units of the funds are not bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by any bank, government entity, the FDIC or any other type of deposit insurance. You should carefully consider the investment objectives, risk, charges, and expenses of the fund before investing.

 

INFORMATION FOR ALL SITE USERS: J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

 

NOT FDIC INSURED | NO BANK GUARANTEE | MAY LOSE VALUE

 

Telephone calls and electronic communications may be monitored and/or recorded.

 

Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://www.jpmorgan.com/privacy.

 

If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

 

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

 

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

 

Diversification does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss.