Skip to main content
logo
  • Investment Strategies
    Overview

    Investment Options

    • Alternatives
    • Beta Strategies
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Liquidity
    • Multi-Asset Solutions

    Capabilities & Solutions

    • ETFs
    • Pension investment solutions
    • Global Insurance Solutions
    • Outsourced CIO
    • The power of active
    • Sustainable Investing
    • Investing in China
  • Insights
    Overview

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Guide to Alternatives
    • Mid-Year Investment Outlook 2026
    • Guide to Investing in Asia
    • Why Alternatives?

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Alternatives
    • Asset Class Views
    • Currency
    • Equity
    • ETF Perspectives
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Sustainable Investing Insights
    • Strategic Investment Advisory Group
  • Resources
    Overview
    • Center for Investment Excellence Podcasts
    • Library
    • Webcasts
    • Morgan Institutional
    • Investment Academy
  • About us
    Overview
    • Our Leadership Team
  • Contact Us
  • Institutional Investors
    • LIQUIDITY INVESTORS
Search
Menu
Search
You are about to leave the site Close
J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
CONTINUE Go Back
On the Minds of Investors

Are technicals amplifying market exuberance?

MP
Meera Pandit

Global Market Strategist

JM
Jon Maier

Chief ETF Strategist

Published: 12/08/2026
In volatile markets, daily rebalancing can mechanically force buying into rallies and selling into declines, amplifying flows and market volatility.

After the spring market low, stocks surged in the second quarter. Momentum outperformed quality by 32 percentage points, semiconductors rose 88% and investors were ravenous for equity exposure. This market exuberance manifested itself in different pockets, with massive inflows into leveraged and thematic ETFs. However, the momentum unwind in Q3 reminds investors it is important to understand the mechanics and risks of these strategies for long-term investors.

Leveraged ETFs: Amplified upside… and downside

The leveraged ETF universe is about $200bn, but growth has been explosive recently, with AUM rising 70% in 2Q alone. This year, 320 new leveraged ETFs have launched (half on single stocks), nearly doubling the available strategies. It’s no surprise that about 75% of leveraged ETF AUM is tech or tech adjacent. While investors have clamored for these strategies, an important distinction is how they are intended to be used: as short-term trading vehicles.

Why? Consider a $100 stock that rises 10% on day one to $110 and falls 10% on day two to $99. Now consider a 3x leveraged ETF on that stock that rises 10% on day one to $130 and falls 10% on day two to $91. Nearly nine times the pain despite the unlevered stock ending in almost the same place it began. Extend that pattern over weeks or months of volatility, and the effect compounds.

For investors who have used leveraged ETFs for longer time horizons, market drawdowns are not for the faint of heart. In 2022, the S&P 500 corrected 24.5%; a triple-levered S&P 500 ETF was down 64%. The S&P 500 fell 18.7% when reciprocal tariffs were imposed last year; a triple-levered S&P 500 ETF was down 49%. 

Volatility is not only amplified for individual investors, but also for the broader market. In volatile markets, daily rebalancing can mechanically force buying into rallies and selling into declines, amplifying flows and market volatility.

Thematic ETFs: Flows follow performance… in both directions

Similarly, select thematic ETFs have had a resurgence in popularity, which often occurs in momentum-driven markets. Through the first 7 months of 2026, top themes brought in $65 billion, dominated by just two funds. However, during less exuberant markets, top themes have struggled to attract inflows because flows tend to follow performance. Some themes, like infrastructure and more recently defense, have garnered enduring flows and strong performance (proxied by the performance of the largest fund in the theme). However, themes like clean energy and electric vehicles gain traction only to lose favor as the realities of achieving these innovations set in. This year, 3 of the top 5 themes – AI (-11.1%), nuclear (-21.3%) and space (-29.6%) – are down double-digits since their peak inflows.

Ultimately, leveraged and thematic ETFs are about expressing high conviction views in a portfolio. For long-term investors, rather than taking on the volatility and risk inherent in these strategies, they may be better served leaning into active ETFs with broader investment objectives rooted in fundamental analysis. 

3271ec58-9499-11f1-8ab1-b9a96055bd7f
  • Equities
  • ETFs
  • Volatility
J.P. Morgan Asset Management

  • About us
  • Investment stewardship
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Sitemap
J.P. Morgan

  • J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Chase

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

Copyright 2026 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.