Policy hub 2025/02/13
Latest updates: Policy updates from the Market Insights desk

Reciprocal Tariffs Impact:

February 19, 2025

U.S. President Trump introduced the "Fair and Reciprocal Plan" to address practices deemed unfair by his administration. This plan aims to equalize tariff rates and increase tariffs in response to non-tariff barriers, like value added taxes (VATs), government subsidies, regulations and legal actions against U.S. companies.

Equalizing tariff rates and focusing on non-tariff barriers could cause potential economic impacts. As we approach the April 1 deadline, here are the markets most at risk:

  • European Union (EU): The U.S. and the EU have similar average tariff rates on each other’s imports, but disparities arise at the product level. The EU imposes a 10% tariff on U.S. autos, whereas the U.S. applies a 2.5% tariff on European autos. In addition, the administration argues that Europe’s value-added tax (VAT), which averages 20% vs. the average U.S. sales tax of 6.6%, disadvantages the U.S. If the U.S. retaliates against VATs, reciprocal tariffs could exceed 20%.
  • Emerging Markets: Tariffs are common in emerging markets to protect nascent industries. India and Brazil have average tariff rates of 11.5% and 7.4%, respectively, on all imports. India, which had a USD 43 billion trade surplus with the U.S. in 2023, has begun reducing tariffs on certain products to ease tensions. Brazil, which maintains a slight trade deficit with the U.S., may face less targeting, though high tariffs on products like U.S. autos and ethanol are still pain points.

Many markets could face increased tariffs

Market trade-weighted average duties on 12 largest U.S. trading partners, all imported goods, 2023

us-election-updates-chart1

Source: WTO, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Markets shown represent the 12 largest U.S. trading partners by volume.

Scoping out government employment

February 10, 2025

The current administration aims to reduce the federal workforce as part of its fiscal strategy, proposing measures like severance packages, hiring freezes, and potential agency eliminations. However, data suggests there may be limited scope for significant cuts. There are three million federal jobs (excluding active duty military personnel), representing just 1.9% of all jobs. In contrast, state and local governments account for 13% of total payroll jobs, but the federal government lacks authority over those positions.

Federal employees on an average earn USD 106.5k annually, so a 10% reduction in the federal workforce would save only USD 32 billion per year or 0.5% of the 2025 federal budget.

Government employment share of total payroll employment

us-election-updates-chart2

Source: Bloomberg, BLS, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data are as of February 9, 2025.

Lessons from 2018: Tariff and Tax impacts on Equities

February 07, 2025

There is uncertainty regarding the development of tariffs and tax reform, but 2018 can offer insights into how these policies could impact profits, corporate activity and market performance.

  • Earnings and Margins: The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act added roughly USD 13 to earnings per share when implemented in 2018. Profits grew an impressive 21% that year, and margins contributed to about half of that profit growth.
  • Revenues: Revenues increased 7.2% in 2018 as consumers enjoyed an income tax cut. However, consumer spending decelerated throughout 2018 and the cumulative effects of tit-for-tat trade tensions began to weigh on revenue in 2019.
  • Buybacks and M&A: Elevated margins from tax cuts invited a flurry of corporate activity. Announced mergers and acquisitions (M&A) volumes leapt in 2017 to record levels, and while momentum slowed in 2018, overall volumes and deal count remained elevated. The value of announced S&P 500 buybacks jumped 68% in 2018.
  • Capex: Capex intentions peaked in 1Q18 and gradually declined, echoing a rise in economic policy uncertainty likely arising from tariffs. We have already seen this dynamic emerge today—last month, capex intentions had the biggest decline in 30 years according to the NFIB.
  • Market performance: Profits helped the S&P 500 notch 19 new all-time highs in 2018 and shrug off volatility generated by trade tensions, but a hawkish Federal Reserve soured markets, leaving the S&P down 6.2%. In the end, earnings contributed 16% points to the S&P 500 return, but multiples subtracted 22% points.

World trade volumes and S&P 500 sales

Year-over-year change, 3-month moving average for world trade volume, 12/31/07-12/31/19

us-election-updates-chart3

Source: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, FactSet, Standard & Poor's, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
Data are as of February 6, 2025.

Lessons from 2018: Tariff and Inflation

February 05, 2025

Overall inflation remained contained in 2018, though sectors that were exposed to tariffs did see upward pressure on prices. However, the limited scope of the 2018 tariffs confined price increases to just a few sectors, and in the generally benign environment of the time, these price rises were offset by price declines elsewhere.

Price changes of goods subject to 2018 tariffs

Annual % change

us-election-updates-chart4

Source: BLS, LSEG Datastream, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data are as of February 3, 2025.

China’s potential responses to tariffs

February 05, 2025

China’s response to U.S. tariffs could resemble its 2018-2019 playbook:

  • Retaliatory tariffs: Large-cap U.S. tech firms derive approximately 14% of their revenues and 16% of their inputs from China.
  • Currency depreciation and export diversification: From peak to trough within the trade tensions period, the CNY depreciated by 16% vs. the USD, helping offset the impact of tariffs and facilitating trade diversification toward other markets.
  • Export restrictions and U.S. company crackdowns: China could expand mineral export controls and challenge U.S. businesses operating in China. 
  • Fiscal stimulus: Tariffs could hurt China’s GDP growth due to lower investment, consumption and reduced business confidence, requiring increased fiscal stimulus.

The Chinese yuan depreciated throughout the 2018-19 trade tensions

U.S. tariff announcements* and currency in 2018-19 (USD / CNY)

policy-hub-feed-chart1

Source: FactSet, Federal Reserve, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. *Labels refer to when the tariffs were announced, and thus, would precede the actual implemented increase in tariffs. Various tariffs on solar panels and washing machines were announced January 2018, 25% tariff on steel and 10% on aluminum were announced in March 2018, 25% tariff on Lists 1&2 were announced June 2018, 25% tariff on List 3 was announced in May 2019 (initially set at 10%), 15% tariff on List 4A was announced August 2019. Lists refer to U.S. imports from China. A temporary truce was announced in December 2018 at the G20 summit. Phase 1 deal was officially announced in December 2019 and signed in January 2020.
Guide to the Markets – Asia. Data reflect most recently available as of 10/02/25.

Tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China

February 03, 2025

Tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China could have a notable impact on each economy:

  • Announced tariffs imply an average import tax of 19% on those goods. Under the crude assumption that a 19% increase in prices results in a 19% decline in purchases, the tariffs proposed could raise USD 206 billion.
  • Total U.S. consumer spending is USD 19.8 trillion. If all of the price increase were passed on to consumers, it could increase CPI by just over 1%.
  • The administration may view tariffs as a strategic tool to address immigration, drug trafficking, trade deficits/disputes and geopolitical influence.
  • Exports to the U.S. make up 32% of Mexico’s GDP and 21% of Canada’s.
  • Mexico and Canada account for 52% of U.S. auto part imports, while Canada alone makes up 60% of U.S. crude oil imports.

Tariffs would impact Mexico, Canada and the U.S. unevenly

Real GDP growth, projected % change from baseline forecast, 2024-2029

policy-hub-feed-chart2

Source: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Warwick McKibbin, Megan Hogan, and Marcus Noland. The international economic implications of a second Trump presidency, PIIE Working Paper 24-20. Estimates are as of January 17, 2025.

Inflation expectations by political affiliation

The latest University of Michigan survey of inflation expectations revealed a sharp increase. However, political biases are clear given the divergence by political affiliation: Republicans expect inflation to nearly stall at 0.1%, while Democrats forecast a surge to 4.2%. 

Red vs. Blue: The inflation expectations divide

University of Michigan. 1-year inflation expectations by political affiliation

policy-hub-feed-chart3

Source: University of Michigan, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

Boosting energy production

U.S. President Trump signed a slew of executive orders and made several declarations to boost U.S. energy production and deregulate oil drilling. However, the U.S. is already the world’s largest crude oil producer and LNG exporter. The difference between U.S. primary energy production and consumption has reached the highest levels in recorded history.

In addition, energy companies may not want to significantly ramp up supply as it would decrease oil and gas prices and impact profitability. Oil exploration and production firms need oil prices at USD 64 on average to profitably drill a new well, leaving little room for current prices to decline. 

U.S. primary energy production and consumption deficit/surplus

Diff. between production vs. consumption, quadrillion British thermal units (1952-2024*)

policy-hub-feed-chart4

Source: EIA, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. British thermal unit is a measure of the heat content of fuels or energy sources. *2024 energy and consumption data are forecasted by J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

Executive Orders in Week 1

January 27, 2025

After the inauguration, the U.S. President Trump:

  • Revoked 67 executive orders signed by President Biden, including regulations imposed on the development of artificial intelligence, public health and environmental issues
  • Ended federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs
  • Withdrew from the Paris climate accord and World Health Organization
  • Declared a national energy emergency, reopening large swaths of federal land and federal waters to oil and gas drilling
  • Put a 60-day freeze on new federal regulations

On balance, less federal regulation going forward could boost real gross domestic product (GDP) growth, although with hard-to-assess impacts on the risk of disaster, should something go wrong.

Podcast: Volatile markets after Lunar New Year - Tariffs, AI and the Fed

February 04, 2025

In this episode of the On Investors' Minds - APAC Edition podcast, Tai Hui welcomes everyone back from the Lunar New Year break and takes a closer look at the recent market volatility that has stemmed from recent tariff tensions, new AI engines, and the U.S. Fed taking a pause.

 

09kx240803054709

Diversification does not guarantee positive returns or eliminate risk of loss.

The Market Insights program provides comprehensive data and commentary on global markets without reference to products. Designed as a tool to help clients understand the markets and support investment decision-making, the program explores the implications of current economic data and changing market conditions. 

For the purposes of MiFID II, the JPM Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs are marketing communications and are not in scope for any MiFID II / MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. Furthermore, the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs, as non-independent research, have not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, nor are they subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.

This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own financial professional, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be appropriate to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not reliable indicators of current and future results.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://am.jpmorgan.com/global/privacy.

This communication is issued by the following entities:

In the United States, by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. or J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc., both regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission; in Latin America, for intended recipients’ use only, by local J.P. Morgan entities, as the case may be. In Canada, for institutional clients’ use only, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and territories except the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In the United Kingdom, by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other European jurisdictions, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. In Asia Pacific (“APAC”), by the following issuing entities and in the respective jurisdictions in which they are primarily regulated: JPMorgan Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, each of which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong; JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), this advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited, which is a member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Australia, to wholesale clients only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth), by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL 376919). For all other markets in APAC, to intended recipients only.

For U.S. only: If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.