Skip to main content
logo
  • Investment Strategies
    Overview

    Investment Options

    • Alternatives
    • Beta Strategies
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Liquidity
    • Multi-Asset Solutions

    Capabilities & Solutions

    • ETFs
    • Pension investment solutions
    • Global Insurance Solutions
    • Outsourced CIO
    • The power of active
    • Sustainable Investing
    • Investing in China
  • Insights
    Overview

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Guide to Alternatives
    • Investment Outlook 2026
    • Guide to Investing in Asia
    • Why Alternatives?

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Alternatives
    • Asset Class Views
    • Currency
    • Equity
    • ETF Perspectives
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Sustainable Investing Insights
    • Strategic Investment Advisory Group
  • Resources
    Overview
    • Center for Investment Excellence Podcasts
    • Library
    • Webcasts
    • Morgan Institutional
    • Investment Academy
  • About us
    Overview
    • Our Leadership Team
  • Contact Us
  • Institutional Investors
    • LIQUIDITY INVESTORS
Search
Menu
Search
You are about to leave the site Close
J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
CONTINUE Go Back

The past 10 years in U.S. multifamily investment have been marked by an intense focus among institutional investors on the Sunbelt region. Strong demographics, less regulation, relative affordability and favorable performance, until recently, have all made it an attractive bet. According to NCREIF data, exposure to the Southern United States has increased by 750 basis points (bps) since 2017. This focus has come at the expense of the Midwest, where only 6% of NCREIF multifamily assets by value are currently held, down from 11% a decade ago.1 This allocation represents a significant underweight compared to the U.S. rental housing stock, as approximately 20% of rental housing units in the United States are located in the region.2

This raises the question: Why are investors underweight the Midwest? The region garners a negative perception from investors because of lagging headline data, but investors might be missing the mark. Here's why:

First, the Midwest offers investors the highest initial yields of any region. Over the last 23 years, apartment properties in the Midwest have traded at cap rates, on average, 45 bps above the national benchmark.3 This higher initial yield might be partly attributed to the lower share of institutional capital investing in the Midwest. According to data from Real Capital Analytics, the share of acquisitions volume done by institutional capital over the last 10 years is the lowest of any region in the United States.4 While higher initial yields coupled with lower rent growth would be logical, historical rent growth in the Midwest has not been as poor as you’d think. In fact, long-run rent growth data shows that over the past 20 years the Midwest has matched the nationwide benchmark. Furthermore, if you exclude Chicago, where many institutional investors have historically focused their efforts, the data improves. The Midwest, excluding Chicago, has outperformed nationwide rent growth by 20 bps on a CAGR basis over the last 20 years.5

Second, while population growth in the Midwest has lagged, there’s variance within, and pockets of growth do exist. Indianapolis, Columbus and Kansas City are markets that have all seen positive domestic net migration over the last 10 years.6 Employment growth also reveals exceptions to the narrative, with both Indianapolis and Columbus outpacing the United States over the long term.7 More near-term indicators of economic dynamism also show positively for parts of the Midwest. According to the U.S. Census’ business formation survey, Indiana and Ohio have both seen a similar growth rate in new business applications in recent years to high-growth states like Florida and Arizona.8

Finally, and looking ahead, there are reasons to be optimistic about the Midwest's future. Whether it’s rent-to-income ratios or home price-to-income ratios, the Midwest consistently ranks as the most affordable region.9 Given the current unaffordability of the nationwide housing market, and the perception that this trend will persist long term, it stands to reason that migration to the Midwest, beyond the areas already experiencing growth, could increase. In fact, consumer migration data indicates that fewer residents have been opting to leave the region in recent years.10

Additionally, the effort to reshore American manufacturing in select industries could act as a catalyst for the Midwest, where manufacturing employment is 1.5 times more concentrated than the national average.11 As these initiatives to reestablish domestic manufacturing take hold, the Midwest stands to benefit from the resulting job growth. Notably, some areas of the Midwest are already experiencing this shift. Both Intel and Eli Lilly are currently under construction on major manufacturing projects in Ohio and Indiana, respectively.12

In conclusion, while investors have shied away from the Midwest, now is the time to start reconsidering. The higher initial yields, better than expected historical rent growth and existing pockets of growth all appear attractive today. Furthermore, the potential for a region-wide rebound could offer significant upside in the future.

 

1 NCREIF, as of 3/31/2025.
2 Moody’s Analytics estimates, U.S. Census Bureau, as of 5/13/2025.
3 MSCI – Real Capital Analytics, as of 6/30/2025.
4 MSCI – Real Capital Analytics, as of 3/31/2025.
5 J.P. Morgan Asset Management, RealPage, as of 3/31/2025.
6 Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Federal Reserve Bank of New York/Equifax Consumer Credit Panel, American Community Survey, as of 3/31/2025.
7 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of 12/31/2024.
8 U.S. Census Bureau Business Formation Statistics, Moody’s Analytics, as of 6/27/2025.
9 J.P. Morgan Asset Management, RealPage, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of 3/31/2025; National Association of Realtors, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Moody’s Analytics, as of 3/31/2025.
10 Based on internal select data from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively “Chase”) including select Chase deposit account activity from 1/1/2017 through 6/30/2025. Information that would have allowed identification of specific customers was removed prior to the analysis.
11 Moody’s Analytics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of 6/30/2025.
12 https://newsroom.intel.com/press-kit/intel-invests-ohio, https://www.lilly.com/news/stories/lilly-medicine-foundry
bb63db13-76ef-11f0-9ef9-0b92f7b39445
  • Alternatives
  • Real estate
J.P. Morgan Asset Management

  • About us
  • Investment stewardship
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Sitemap
J.P. Morgan

  • J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Chase

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.