Multi-Asset Solutions Strategy Report

“America First”: Coming soon to a stock market near you

Building in blue sky
John Bilton

Head of Global Multi-Asset Strategy Multi-Asset Solutions

Thushka Maharaj

Global Strategist in Multi-Asset Solutions

Published: 27-02-2025

In brief

  • The “America first” agenda the new U.S. administration is following has not translated into U.S. equity outperformance: The S&P 500 has trailed China’s and European indices so far in 2025, although  in bond markets, U.S. Treasuries are rallying while government bonds in China and Europe have declined.
  • Equity outperformance in Europe and China is primarily valuation driven and, in our view, overestimates the economic outlook and underestimates the risks from tariffs. Fiscal and monetary policy interventions could be an upside risk  in the second half of the year. We maintain a preference for U.S. and Japanese equities in portfolios today.
  • Bond market underperformance in Europe and China could reverse, given disinflationary trends in both regions and the scope for further rate cuts. Even allowing for optically low yields today, we see scope for attractive real returns from these bond markets.
  • Geopolitical risks remain elevated amid U.S. tariff threats – tariffs would negatively affect growth in Europe and China – but the scope for a lasting resolution in Ukraine presents a potentially offsetting boost to European growth, particularly should European investment in security accelerate.

The “America first” agenda is apparent in virtually every policy announcement from the new U.S. administration. It is, however, notably absent in the year-to-date performance of U.S. stocks. Two months into 2025, the S&P 500 is up 1.3%, but those countries on the sharp end of tariff threats are doing rather better: Canada’s stock index is up 2.4% so far in 2025, Mexico’s 8.8%, China’s is up 17.6% and Europe’s 12.1%.

Bond markets paint a different picture. U.S. 10-year Treasury yields are down 32 basis points (bps) year-to-date, while Chinese and German 10-year government bond yields 7 bps and 11 bps higher, respectively. That has led the U.S. 10-year Treasury index to outperform its Chinese and European equivalents by about 250 bps in 2025.

The early outperformance of non-U.S. equity markets has been attributed to narrowing valuation discounts vs. U.S. equities. However, the outperformance of U.S. bonds appears at odds with both the relative growth outlook between the U.S., China and Europe, and the policy backdrop. As the year plays out, we expect the early outperformance of global stocks vs. U.S. to fade.

Meanwhile in bond markets the gradual cooling of U.S. growth back towards a trend-like 2%, together with fiscal event risks both in the U.S. and internationally, create some intriguing relative value opportunities.

What may lie ahead for Chinese asset markets?

It seems incongruous that China, the country most squarely in the crosshairs of tariff threats, would lead equity returns in 2025. It may be that a lot of bad news is already in the price of an unloved market. China’s 2025 equity rally is mostly a tech story. January’s Deepseek news, when the Chinese AI startup launched an apparently breakthrough model, was a key catalyst; in Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index (HSI), in which the tech complex comprises 40%, the sector has gained almost 30% in 2025. The move is valuation driven and the HSI price-earnings (P/E) ratio is now close to its 10-year average of 10.6x.

Hopes that the valuation-led rally morphs into a sustainable, earnings-driven move may be forlorn. Consensus 2025 EPS growth expectations for the HSI, at 5%, are modest but reflect a lackluster economy. We see Chinese GDP slipping from 5.7% in 2024 to 4.1% in 2025, and expect strong policy easing to offset the forecasted hit from tariffs.

We anticipate some fiscal support as China’s budget deficit is set to grow by 100bps, to 4%, this year; and while we expect People’s Bank of China (PBoC) rates to remain accommodative, China faces disinflation. Even with the 7-day repo rate at just 1.5%, we see Chinese CPI of just 0.3% by 4Q25, translating to a real interest rate of over 100bps in 2025 – hardly stimulative, given the external factors China faces.

Our instinct is to book some profits in Chinese stocks. Should the PBoC ease more aggressively – and, particularly, should China unleash further fiscal stimulus – there may be upside to Chinese equity. But for now, the prospect of tariff threats pivoting from Brussels to Beijing presents a headwind.

By contrast, the recent backup in Chinese yields might offer an entry point. Economically, China has an unappealing mix of an aging workforce, a high personal savings rate, excess capacity and positive real rates. True, 10-year yields of 1.8% are optically low, but we’ve seen this movie before. 

Go back 25 years and look at Japan from February 2000 to the dawn of Abenomics1  in late 2012: During that 12-year period, Japanese CPI averaged -0.3%, so even with policy rates close to zero, the real rate averaged almost +50bps even as economic growth contracted by around 50bps per year. in February 2000, 10-year Japanese government bond (JGB) yields were close to where Chinese 10-year yields are today; over the subsequent 12 years up to the beginning of Abenomics, the 10-year JGB index rose 44% and saw annualized real returns of 3.5%.

Europe: An intriguing balance of risks

European stocks have also been strong in early 2025, driven entirely by multiple expansion, but we disagree that this was a “cheap” index playing catchup. Compared to the S&P 500, Europe was cheap – but then, so was everything. The Eurostoxx 50 Index P/E started 2025 at 14.1x, half a turn above its five-year average, and had expanded to 15.7x by late February. More tellingly, the valuation differential between the median stock in the S&P 500 and the median stock in Europe is at its narrowest level, post-pandemic (Exhibit 1). For European stocks to rally further, earnings growth would be needed and the outlook for that is rather murky. 

European stocks’ discount to U.S. stocks has narrowed

Exhibit 1: The relative valuation differential of median U.S. stock vs. median European stock

exhibit_1_feb_MSR

Source: Factset, J.P. Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; data as of February 2025

Tariff threats complicate the European outlook, as they do China’s, and there are also the tectonic changes in Europe’s strategic military partnership with the U.S. to consider. From a Chinese standpoint, tariff negotiations are ultimately transactional but from a European perspective, the combination of tariff threats and a reset of the U.S. relationship is fundamental.

We expect European GDP to expand 0.8% in 2025 but with risks in both directions. Should tariffs of 4%–5% be implemented, they could knock 50bps off annual growth, while a ceasefire in Ukraine could add 50bps–100bps over three years. But what may yet present an upside risk to growth is Europe’s response to Washington’s talks with Moscow, and the wider conversation about Europe’s investment in its own security – especially given the German election outcome.

Improved investor sentiment toward Europe has been driven by optimism over fiscal expansion and a resolution of the Ukraine war. Near term, we believe that European equities currently underprice the risks surrounding both of these issues, and that investors are unduly sanguine about Europe’s growth outlook. Nevertheless, in the longer term, the proposal from Germany’s presumptive next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, to ease the “debt brake,” to free up fiscal spending rules before the next parliament on March 25, is a material upside risk.

While the outcome of Germany’s election implies a simpler two-partner coalition between center-right and center-left, fringe parties on the left and right are set to enter the Bundestag (parliament) in sufficient size to have an effective blocking minority for constitutional changes – including the debt brake. But the current mix in the Bundestag has no such blocking minority; thus, an easing of the debt brake leading to greater military spending and higher domestic investment could be, at least theoretically, more plausible.

Higher European military spending would level the playing field in ongoing security negotiations and could tilt the shape of a ceasefire more in favor of Europe and Ukraine. Greater investment may also kickstart growth in Germany, the European industrial heartland, after two years of declines. With global equities facing seasonal headwinds, from looming U.S. tax return deadlines and signs of exhaustion in retail and systematic flows, the prospect of such a political gamble coming good may not boost European stocks much yet. But it presents an upside risk to European growth as the year unfolds.

Investment implications

In the near-term, we think there is more prospect for European core bonds to rebound. We see European policy rates dipping below 2% by summer, as the disinflation process becomes entrenched, but the market does not agree. The prospect of increased fiscal spending has added further upward pressure on European yields, but we see wage moderation driving disinflation and accelerating the easing cycle (Exhibit 2). These factors lead us to favor owning duration in the eurozone. 

Slower wage growth and better labor market balance imply further downward pressure on core services inflation

Exhibit 2: Eurozone core inflation has moved back to the ECB's target

exhibit_2_feb_MSR

Source: Bloomberg, Eurostat, European Central Bank; data as of December 2024 (core CPI, wages) and January 2025 (European Commission survey)

In sum, the outperformance of non-U.S. stocks over the S&P 500, and the underperformance of non-U.S. bonds vs. U.S. Treasuries may be running out of steam. We expect some consolidation in risk assets in the near term as U.S. growth moderates towards trend, which may point to the early 2025 winners giving back a portion of their gains. 

Near term, non-U.S. bond markets overestimate regional growth and underestimate local disinflation. Meanwhile, non-U.S. equities have closed their valuation gaps with the U.S., yet their earnings outlook remains mixed. As such, we choose not to chase these markets, and believe the earnings outlook for U.S. stocks remains superior, unless or until we see tangible fiscal expansion in Europe or meaningfully easier monetary policy in China. 

Exhibit 3: Multi-Asset Solutions Asset Class Views

Asset ClassOpportunity SetUWNOWChangeConvictionDescription
Main asset classesEquitiesEquities — OverweightNeutralLowGlobal growth close to trend supports ongoing earnings growth, valuations a headwind even with easing cycle in play
DurationDuration — NeutralNeutralNot applicableRate cutting cycle limits upside for yields, but market may be pricing more rate cuts than realistic given solid pace of growth
CreditCredit — OverweightNeutralLowTrend-like growth and attractive all-in yields supportive to credit despite tight levels of credit spreads
Preference by asset classEquitiesU.S. U.S. — OverweightNeutralLowHigh quality and strong EPS but valuations, esp. in tech, are a headwind; concentration risks mitigated by cash flow generation
EuropeEurope — UnderweightNeutralModerateOngoing weakness in global goods cycle and evidence of inventory overhang in key industries hold back EU equities
JapanJapan — OverweightNeutralLowImproving earnings yield and bottom up profitability point to upside, outflows suggest that overbought conditions from mid-year are behind us
UKUK — OverweightLowAttractive valuations and higher free cash flows support UK equities, defensive nature of UK index adds diversification
AustraliaAustralia — UnderweightNeutralModerateERRs continue to lag peers but valuations expensive; soft demand for base metals a headwind to mining sector
CanadaCanada — NeutralNeutralNot applicableEconomy has shown some resilience in face of higher rates, but business outlook weak and valuations unappealing
Hong KongHong Kong — OverweightNeutralLow Activity in China remains weak and is a headwind to earnings. but valuations and positioning are supportive and increased policy responses could provide a boost
EMEM — NeutralNot applicableEarnings revisions very negative and flows not supportive in EM equities
Fixed IncomeU.S. treasuriesU.S. treasuries — NeutralNot applicableScope for fiscal stimulus and deregulation could improve U.S. growth and raise the equilibrium yield for USTs
German BundsGerman Bunds — OverweightLowPotentially attractive as ECB looks set to cut rates at a decent clip, but with election risks in Feb 25 and yields already low may be at risk of volatility
JGBJGB — UnderweightNeutralLowFurther BoJ hikes coming in 2025 maintain upside risks to JGB yields but at current levels demand is likely to remain reasonable
UK GiltsUK Gilts — NeutralNeutralNot applicableWeak UK economy with scope for BoE to cut rates to offset worst impact of mortgage resets for UK consumers
Australia bondsAustralia bonds — NeutralNot applicableLeast priced in for rate cuts of the major bond markets, also postive carry is an attractive feature
Canada bondsCanada bonds — UnderweightLowHas rallied a lot alongside the U.S. so spreads are tight and it is also the market with the most punitive carry dynamics
BTPsBTPs — OverweightNeutralLowLower ECB rates supportive to periphery bonds but near-term risks around election cycle in Europe could mean some volatility
Corporate Inv. GradeCorporate Inv. Grade — NeutralNot applicableRobust corporate health and demand for quality carry; spreads tight, but carry advantage over sovereigns persists
Corporate High YieldCorporate High Yield — OverweightNeutralLowContained recession risks and improving quality in HY index supportive, spreads are tight but all-in yields are attractive
EMD SovereignEMD Sovereign — NeutralNeutralNot applicableFavor U.S. high yield to EMD sovereign given more fragile tail credits exposure in EMD compared to U.S. HY
CurrencyUSDUSD — OverweightNeutralModerateGrowth advantage of U.S. over RoW set to widen further, so even as Fed cutting cycle weighs on USD, growth differential is supportive
EUREUR — UnderweightNeutralLowEUR undermined by weakness of growth in Europe and likely need for the ECB to become more aggressive in cutting rates
JPYJPY — NeutralNot applicableBoJ the only major central bank hiking rates, lends support to JPY as does solid domestic growth outlook
CHFCHF — UnderweightNeutralModerateFX interventions have been reduced, and SNB on clear easing path, CHF could end up as the lowest yielder of the majors

The tick chart and views expressed in this note reflect the information and data available up to February 2025.

1  The actions under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (2006–to 2007 and 2012–2020), characterized by aggressive monetary policy, flexible fiscal policy and structural reform of the economy.
Germany’s debt brake (Schuldenbremse), established in 2009, limits the federal structural deficit to 0.35% of GDP and mandates balanced budgets for states, with exceptions for emergencies, to ensure fiscal discipline.
09cs252502184515
John Bilton

Head of Global Multi-Asset Strategy Multi-Asset Solutions

Thushka Maharaj

Global Strategist in Multi-Asset Solutions

Published: 27-02-2025