Review of markets over January 2019 - J.P. Morgan Asset Management

Review of markets over January 2019

Contributors Jai Malhi, Global Markets Insights Strategy Team

Equity markets experienced welcome respite in January, after a torrid end to 2018. Both developed and emerging market equities gained over 7% in total return terms, boosted by signals from the US Federal Reserve (Fed) that it would be more patient with further rate rises, as well as by improving rhetoric towards China from the White House. Risk assets recovered some of the losses they made in the fourth quarter. Even so, political uncertainty remains a headwind, while recent macroeconomic data releases continue to send mixed signals about the outlook for the global economy.

Exhibit 1: Asset class and style returns in local currency

Source: Barclays, Bloomberg, FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. DM Equities: MSCI World; REITs: FTSE NAREIT All REITs; Cmdty: Bloomberg UBS Commodity Index; Global Agg: Barclays Global Aggregate; Growth: MSCI World Growth; Value: MSCI World Value; Small cap: MSCI World Small Cap. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 January 2019.


The first signs of the US economy being hurt by the trade tensions with China were felt in January. The December ISM manufacturing survey fell significantly to 54.1—the largest monthly decline since 2008. The survey was largely dragged down by a fall in the new orders component. However, equity markets have been buoyed by the truce between the US and China, which is set to be active until at least 1 March. The S&P finished the month up 8.0%.

The US government entered the year partially closed. A funding impasse over border security led to the 35-day government shutdown, which was the longest in history. However, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) expects that almost all of the real GDP lost over the shutdown will largely be recovered by the end of this year. The impact over the longer term might eventually be small but it has certainly affected sentiment in the US. The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index for January fell to 90.7 from 98.3 previously and the Conference Board’s measure of consumer confidence fell from 126.6 to 120.2.

The January jobs report may be affected by the government shutdown but the December jobs report was quite strong. The unemployment rate picked up to 3.9% but this can largely be explained by a tick up in the participation rate. 312,000 non-farm jobs were added to the US economy and wage growth inched up to 3.3% year on year.

While the next few jobs reports will continue to be watched by the Fed for signs of higher wage growth, the US central bank has signalled that it is in less of a rush to tighten this year. Specifically, the Fed highlighted that muted inflation pressures meant that the committee could afford to be patient. The lower oil price, despite recent gains, meant that the latest headline inflation reading for December fell to 1.9% year on year. This means there will be less pressure on the Fed to raise rates in order to control inflation. The bond markets throughout January have priced in no further rate rises from the Fed over 2019.

The US equity market may be sensitive to incoming earnings reports. With around 40% of companies having reported their fourth-quarter earnings, earnings-per-share growth is 15% year on year so far.

Exhibit 2: World stock market returns in local currency

Source: FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, Standard & Poor’s, TOPIX, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 January 2019.


Concerns over a slowdown in China have not dissipated. Real GDP for the fourth quarter was announced at 6.4% year on year—dipping below the 6.5% mark for the first time. In the face of rising uncertainty emanating from the domestic slowdown, as well as the trade tensions with the US, the Chinese authorities have looked to provide stimulus to the economy. The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) announced that it would cut its Reserve Requirement Ratio by 100 basis points throughout January. As estimated by the central bank, this round of cuts should inject roughly RMB 800 billion into the Chinese economy— equivalent to roughly 0.8% of Chinese nominal GDP. Further easing from the PBoC is expected throughout 2019 to help support the domestic economy. Despite the recent slowdown in GDP growth, both retail sales and industrial production beat expectations in the recent data releases. There was also further proof that infrastructure spending was continuing to pick up, which should help provide some targeted stimulus to the economy. The MSCI EM index rose by 7.2% over the month.

Exhibit 3: Fixed income sector returns in local currency

Source: Barclays, BofA/Merrill Lynch, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. IL: Barclays Global Inflation-Linked; Euro Treas: Barclays Euro Aggregate Government - Treasury; US Treas: Barclays US Aggregate Government - Treasury; Global IG: Barclays Global Aggregate - Corporates; US HY: BofA/Merrill Lynch US HY Constrained; Euro HY: BofA/Merrill Lynch Euro Non-Financial HY Constrained; EM Debt: J.P. Morgan EMBIG. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 January 2019.


Europe has been caught in the crossfire of the trade war and has also been hurt by the fall in demand from China. And the recent data from Europe did not improve in January. The manufacturing new export orders component of the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for the eurozone remained below 50. In France, the flash composite PMI fell further to 47.9, despite a slowing in the momentum of the “yellow vest” protests that have caused significant violence and disruption to the country. More positively, consumer confidence in France and the eurozone as a whole picked up slightly.

Elsewhere in Europe, the Italian government’s budget proposals, which was almost placed under the effective deficit procedure by the European Commission, were approved by the government and the Italian president. While the two main features of these proposals—the citizens’ income and pension reform—are unlikely to be beneficial to fiscal sustainability in the longer term, the near-term risks appear to have eased. 10-year Italian government bond yields ended the month 37 basis points lower than the January high. Initial estimates of Italian GDP for the fourth quarter of 2018 showed a contraction of 0.2% over the previous quarter. This puts Italy into a technical recession. The fall in Italian government bond yields means that their price goes up, allowing Italian bonds to have given a positive return of 1.2% over the month. As a sign of the stabilising European periphery, Spanish bonds ended the month returning 1.5%.

Despite the minor improvement in some of the political uncertainties, concerns over the persistence of slowing growth in the eurozone were still prevalent. The European Central Bank (ECB) made reference to the unexpected nature of the persistence of the factors that have contributed to the slowdown in growth. The ECB also said the risks surrounding the euro area growth outlook have moved to the downside. Despite this, the central bank kept its forward guidance on rates as well as its balance sheet re-investments the same. Similar to the ECB, the Bank of Japan also kept its monetary policy tools unchanged, but it did downgrade its inflation forecast for the fiscal year 2019 from 1.4% to 0.9%.

One positive for Europe was that the unemployment rate for November fell to 7.9%. Domestic demand in Europe has remained fairly resilient despite the external factors that have threatened its progression. The lower oil price and the continued improvement in the labour market should help to support eurozone consumption.

Exhibit 4: Fixed income government bond returns in local currency

Source: FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. All indices are J.P. Morgan GBIs (Government Bond Indices). All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 January 2019.


Brexit uncertainty continued to dominate the headlines in the UK. Parliament proceeded to vote on the deal that the prime minister Theresa May had negotiated with the European Union (EU). That vote resulted in the deal failing to pass by a significant margin (432 against, 202 for). A series of votes then took place in order to establish a potential way forward for the Brexit negotiations that could command the support of a majority of members of parliament (MPs). The result of these votes showed two things. Firstly, that there is a majority in parliament against a no-deal scenario. And secondly, that there is a majority of MPs who would support May’s deal if she can re-negotiate the Irish border backstop. If she is able to obtain these concessions from the EU around the backstop then it is likely that a version of her deal could pass in parliament. The prime minister has currently set 13 February as the date at which she would like to next put a revised deal to vote at the House of Commons.

Despite the political gridlock the UK labour market remains healthy. The unemployment rate fell to 4.0%, while wage growth picked up to 3.4% year on year. This is another sign that, were a no-deal Brexit to be taken off the table, the underlying strength of the labour market may justify moderately higher interest rates, as long as global growth holds up.


Ultimately, two significant shifts have helped risk assets over the course of January. First, the Fed’s move to a more dovish stance regarding its rate guidance has helped to ease the market’s fears about rates getting too tight at a time when the pace of global growth looks to be slowing. Second, the rhetoric from the US administration towards China also softened somewhat. The trade tensions have hurt China, Europe and now look to be biting in the US. Any deal would be a welcome relief for markets but the US and China are still some way from striking a deal, so there are risks that remain. At this stage in the cycle, where the macroeconomic data is more mixed and political uncertainties remain, we have lower conviction in the economic and market outlook. Therefore, it makes sense to be making gradual shifts in portfolios to add more resilience and to look to strategies that can more dynamically shift their exposure to risk assets.

Exhibit 5: Index returns in January 2019 (%)

Source: MSCI, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data as of 31 January 2019.


Related products

JPM Global Macro Opportunities Fund
Leveraging global macro themes to generate performance. This fund targets positive returns in various market conditions by capitalising on the opportunities created by economic trends within a risk-controlled framework.
JPM Unconstrained Bond Fund
JPM US Equity Income Fund

Important information

This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields is not a reliable indicator of current and future results.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. This communication is issued in the United Kingdom by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, Registered in England No. 01161446. Registered address: 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP.