Is the strong performance in European equities sustainable?

Gabriela Santos

Chief Market Strategist

Published: 2025-02-21
Listen now
00:00

Hello my name is Gabriela Santos. I am the Chief Market Strategist for the Americas at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Welcome to On the Minds of Investors. Today's topic "Is the strong performance in European equities sustainable?" Following another strong year of “U.S. exceptionalism” in economic growth and market returns, non-U.S. equity markets are leading this year. U.S. equities are up 4.6%, while international equities excluding the U.S. are up 7.1%, driven by multiple expansion, and some improvement in earnings expectations and currency appreciation. Leading are the equity markets that had underperformed last year: LATAM, China, Korea and the Eurozone (all up over 10%). European performance stands out, with the best start since 1997. Is this strong performance sustainable? After the initial rerating, much will depend on the sustainability of the cyclical recovery – and importantly on whether more structural changes are afoot. 

Entering 2025, European equity valuations were average historically but heavily discounted versus the U.S. at 41% (versus the average 16%), with every sector discounted except technology[1]. This year’s rerating spans multiple sectors, notably health care, communication services, industrials, financials and consumer discretionary. The catalysts for this re-rating have included cyclical and structural factors:

Greenshoots in the cyclical data:

Cautious consumers starting to perk up: Euroarea consumer confidence has moved up for two months, a glimmer of hope that the record-high excess savings cash pile is finally set to be spent. A resolution to the War in Ukraine could serve as another positive confidence shock.

Manufacturing sector awakening from its slumber: The Composite Euroarea PMI survey has moved up 2 points since the November low, led by manufacturing. A resolution to the War in Ukraine could provide the return of cheap Russian gas through the Ukraine pipeline.

Financial conditions have started to improve: Bank lending to households and corporates picking up in December. Importantly, the ECB may still have scope to cut rates another 75bps this year – all important for a real economy dependent on floating rate bank loans.

More steps in the right direction to tackle structural issues:

Potential removal of the German debt brake: Unlike the U.S., Germany has remained focused on strict budget disciple[2], despite a weak manufacturing sector. Momentum seems to be finally turning towards more fiscal spending, culminating in this year’s German Elections.

More tolerance of fiscal spending, especially on defense: Over the last decade, some European countries like France and Germany have raised defense spending to NATO’s 2% of GDP goal, but more indebted countries have not. European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen has suggested increasing the goal to 3% of GDP. A bigger game changer would be using a Euroarea common financing mechanism to fund regional defense spending[3].

A moment for unity in response to U.S. tariffs? The likelihood of the U.S. imposing retaliatory tariffs on European imports, especially autos, seems high. Typically, a “crisis” prompts European countries to unite to address common issues. This may be an opportunity to enact productivity-enhancing reforms, like removing barriers to trade within Europe and reducing regulations in the digital/technology sector.

Whether the rerating continues depends on more improvement in the cyclical data (U.S. retaliatory tariffs on European goods are an important risk) and, importantly, on substantial improvement on the structural issues. Doubts on the latter removes conviction on an overweight to European equities now; nevertheless, this episode is a reminder of the importance of valuations when investing and of maintaining sufficient global equity exposure.

 

1 The technology sector within the MSCI European Monetary Union represents 13% of the index, with two companies dominating (SAP and ASML). On their own, these two companies represent 10% of the overall index.

2 The German constitutional debt brake stipulates that the federal government can have a structural deficit of no more than 0.35% of GDP per year.

3 A white paper on defense spending is set to be published by the European Commission on March 19th

Entering 2025, European equity valuations were average historically but heavily discounted versus the U.S. at 41% (versus the average 16%), with every sector discounted except technology.

Following another strong year of “U.S. exceptionalism” in economic growth and market returns, non-U.S. equity markets are leading this year. U.S. equities are up 4.6%, while international equities excluding the U.S. are up 7.1%, driven by multiple expansion, and some improvement in earnings expectations and currency appreciation. Leading are the equity markets that had underperformed last year: LATAM, China, Korea and the Eurozone (all up over 10%). European performance stands out, with the best start since 1997. Is this strong performance sustainable? After the initial rerating, much will depend on the sustainability of the cyclical recovery – and importantly on whether more structural changes are afoot. 

Entering 2025, European equity valuations were average historically but heavily discounted versus the U.S. at 41% (versus the average 16%), with every sector discounted except technology1. This year’s rerating spans multiple sectors, notably health care, communication services, industrials, financials and consumer discretionary. The catalysts for this re-rating have included cyclical and structural factors:

Greenshoots in the cyclical data:

  1. Cautious consumers starting to perk up: Euroarea consumer confidence has moved up for two months, a glimmer of hope that the record-high excess savings cash pile is finally set to be spent. A resolution to the War in Ukraine could serve as another positive confidence shock.
  2. Manufacturing sector awakening from its slumber: The Composite Euroarea PMI survey has moved up 2 points since the November low, led by manufacturing. A resolution to the War in Ukraine could provide the return of cheap Russian gas through the Ukraine pipeline.
  3. Financial conditions have started to improve: Bank lending to households and corporates picking up in December. Importantly, the ECB may still have scope to cut rates another 75bps this year – all important for a real economy dependent on floating rate bank loans.

More steps in the right direction to tackle structural issues:

  1. Potential removal of the German debt brake: Unlike the U.S., Germany has remained focused on strict budget discipline2, despite a weak manufacturing sector. Momentum seems to be finally turning towards more fiscal spending, culminating in this year’s German Elections.
  2. More tolerance of fiscal spending, especially on defense: Over the last decade, some European countries like France and Germany have raised defense spending to NATO’s 2% of GDP goal, but more indebted countries have not. European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen has suggested increasing the goal to 3% of GDP. A bigger game changer would be using a Euroarea common financing mechanism to fund regional defense spending3.
  3. A moment for unity in response to U.S. tariffs? The likelihood of the U.S. imposing retaliatory tariffs on European imports, especially autos, seems high. Typically, a “crisis” prompts European countries to unite to address common issues. This may be an opportunity to enact productivity-enhancing reforms, like removing barriers to trade within Europe and reducing regulations in the digital/technology sector.

Whether the rerating continues depends on more improvement in the cyclical data (U.S. retaliatory tariffs on European goods are an important risk) and, importantly, on substantial improvement on the structural issues. Doubts on the latter removes conviction on an overweight to European equities now; nevertheless, this episode is a reminder of the importance of valuations when investing and of maintaining sufficient global equity exposure.

Many sectors in Europe have seen multiple expansion, but discount to the U.S. still historically large

NTM P/E ratio, MSCI EMU premium or discount versus S&P 500

NTM P/E ratio, MSCI EMU premium or discount versus S&P 500

Source: FactSet, MSCI, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current and future results. Data are as of February 19, 2025.

1 The technology sector within the MSCI European Monetary Union represents 13% of the index, with two companies dominating (SAP and ASML). On their own, these two companies represent 10% of the overall index.
2 The German constitutional debt brake stipulates that the federal government can have a structural deficit of no more than 0.35% of GDP per year.
3 A white paper on defense spending is set to be published by the European Commission on March 19th. 
 09lp252102114346
Gabriela Santos

Chief Market Strategist

Published: 2025-02-21
Listen now
00:00

Hello my name is Gabriela Santos. I am the Chief Market Strategist for the Americas at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Welcome to On the Minds of Investors. Today's topic "Is the strong performance in European equities sustainable?" Following another strong year of “U.S. exceptionalism” in economic growth and market returns, non-U.S. equity markets are leading this year. U.S. equities are up 4.6%, while international equities excluding the U.S. are up 7.1%, driven by multiple expansion, and some improvement in earnings expectations and currency appreciation. Leading are the equity markets that had underperformed last year: LATAM, China, Korea and the Eurozone (all up over 10%). European performance stands out, with the best start since 1997. Is this strong performance sustainable? After the initial rerating, much will depend on the sustainability of the cyclical recovery – and importantly on whether more structural changes are afoot. 

Entering 2025, European equity valuations were average historically but heavily discounted versus the U.S. at 41% (versus the average 16%), with every sector discounted except technology[1]. This year’s rerating spans multiple sectors, notably health care, communication services, industrials, financials and consumer discretionary. The catalysts for this re-rating have included cyclical and structural factors:

Greenshoots in the cyclical data:

Cautious consumers starting to perk up: Euroarea consumer confidence has moved up for two months, a glimmer of hope that the record-high excess savings cash pile is finally set to be spent. A resolution to the War in Ukraine could serve as another positive confidence shock.

Manufacturing sector awakening from its slumber: The Composite Euroarea PMI survey has moved up 2 points since the November low, led by manufacturing. A resolution to the War in Ukraine could provide the return of cheap Russian gas through the Ukraine pipeline.

Financial conditions have started to improve: Bank lending to households and corporates picking up in December. Importantly, the ECB may still have scope to cut rates another 75bps this year – all important for a real economy dependent on floating rate bank loans.

More steps in the right direction to tackle structural issues:

Potential removal of the German debt brake: Unlike the U.S., Germany has remained focused on strict budget disciple[2], despite a weak manufacturing sector. Momentum seems to be finally turning towards more fiscal spending, culminating in this year’s German Elections.

More tolerance of fiscal spending, especially on defense: Over the last decade, some European countries like France and Germany have raised defense spending to NATO’s 2% of GDP goal, but more indebted countries have not. European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen has suggested increasing the goal to 3% of GDP. A bigger game changer would be using a Euroarea common financing mechanism to fund regional defense spending[3].

A moment for unity in response to U.S. tariffs? The likelihood of the U.S. imposing retaliatory tariffs on European imports, especially autos, seems high. Typically, a “crisis” prompts European countries to unite to address common issues. This may be an opportunity to enact productivity-enhancing reforms, like removing barriers to trade within Europe and reducing regulations in the digital/technology sector.

Whether the rerating continues depends on more improvement in the cyclical data (U.S. retaliatory tariffs on European goods are an important risk) and, importantly, on substantial improvement on the structural issues. Doubts on the latter removes conviction on an overweight to European equities now; nevertheless, this episode is a reminder of the importance of valuations when investing and of maintaining sufficient global equity exposure.

 

1 The technology sector within the MSCI European Monetary Union represents 13% of the index, with two companies dominating (SAP and ASML). On their own, these two companies represent 10% of the overall index.

2 The German constitutional debt brake stipulates that the federal government can have a structural deficit of no more than 0.35% of GDP per year.

3 A white paper on defense spending is set to be published by the European Commission on March 19th

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

The price of equity securities may fluctuate rapidly or unpredictably due to factors affecting individual companies, as well as changes in economic or political conditions. These price movements may result in loss of your investment. The website is not to be construed as a public offering of a security in any jurisdiction in Canada. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with ETF investments. Important information about the JPMorgan ETFs, including investment objectives and strategies, and applicable management fees, performance fees (if any), and other charges, is contained in their respective prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. ETFs are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Past returns are not necessarily indicative of future performance. You should not rely on or view any past performance as a guarantee of future investment performance. The JPMorgan ETFs are not being offered in the United States by way of this website and are not intended for distribution, or to be marketed or sold, in the United States. The information and materials in this website are for informational purposes only. They are not intended as investment, financial or other advice. The information included in this website is not an offer to sell. While the information and material in this website are believed to be accurate at the time its prepared, J.P. Morgan Asset Management (Canada), Inc. (and its affiliates, subsidiaries, or sub-advisors) cannot give any assurance that it is accurate, complete, or current at all times. By accessing this website or any of its pages you understand, accept, and agree to the terms set out above. If you do not agree to these terms, do not view the website or any of its pages. This website is issued in Canada, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and territories except the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador.

 

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.