Skip to main content
logo
  • Funds

    Funds

    • Global Bond Opportunities
    • Global Income
    • Global Macro Opportunities
    • Global Research Enhanced Index
    • US Select Equity

    ETF BDRs

    • ETF BRDs Investing
    • Education
  • Insights

    Market Insights

    • Guide to the Markets
    • Guide to China
    • Principles for global diversification

    Portfolio Insights

    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Asset Class Views
  • About us

    About us

    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • How to invest
  • Language
    • English
    • Português/ Portuguese
  • Role
  • Country
  • Search
    Search
    Menu
    1. Post Financial Crisis Failure of Monetary Stimulus

    • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

    Central banks and sluggish growth

    The failure of monetary stimulus

    Key points

    • During the financial crisis, central banks implemented unprecedented conventional and unconventional monetary stimulus in an effort to boost aggregate demand. But the net impact of further monetary easing may well be negative.

    • We consider six broad transmission mechanisms by which lower interest rates impact demand in the economy. The price, wealth and currency effects of monetary stimulus are mostly positive and the income, confidence and expectations effects are mostly negative.

    • Further central bank is easing is likely. We believe it will contribute to an era of continued slow growth, low inflation and low interest rates in the decade ahead.
    The failure of monetary stimulus

    Doctors know that any medicine can be a poison if administered to the wrong patient, at the wrong time or in the wrong dose. Its efficacy depends on a fine balance of positive over negative effects.

    Similarly, economists recognize that there are serious negative side effects from monetary stimulus, but few properly assess the relative strength of the positive and negative effects. During the financial crisis, central banks implemented unprecedented conventional and unconventional monetary stimulus in an effort to boost aggregate demand. However, with the evolution of economies over time, it may be the case now that, for major developed nations, cutting interest rates from already very low levels could actually suppress rather than stimulate demand. This could possibly render the global economy weaker rather than stronger after the latest round of monetary easing.

    To see this, consider the six broad transmission mechanisms by which lower interest rates impact demand in the economy:

    On the positive side, there is a price effect, by which lower rates make it cheaper to borrow and less rewarding to save, thus encouraging investment and discouraging savings. In addition, there is a wealth effect, by which lower interest rates boost asset prices and thus wealth, promoting consumption, and a currency effect, by which lower interest rates can cause a currency to fall, boosting exports and reducing imports.  

    However, we believe these effects are less positive today. For example, in the U.S. the declining importance of the manufacturing sector, which has fallen from over 30% of employment in the 1950s to less than 9% today, has reduced the benefit of lower interest rates in spurring capital spending. Further, a very low starting level of interest rates makes other factors, such as down payments and credit scores, more important in qualifying for a mortgage, diminishing the ability of lower rates to stimulate housing. The wealth effect has also become less potent over time because of an increasing concentration of wealth among upper-income households, which are less likely to spend stock market windfalls. Federal Reserve (Fed) easing can still help boost exports by pushing the U.S. dollar down, but this doesn’t work if other central banks are trying to do the same thing. 

    On the negative side, there is an income effect, by which lower rates reduce income for savers, potentially more than they cut expenses for borrowers. There are also psychological impacts.  These include a confidence effect, by which consumers and businesses worry when they see a central bank being forced to cut rates to support the economy, and an expectations effect, by which borrowers assume that rate cuts today mean further rate cuts down the road and thus wait for lower rates before borrowing.

    To illustrate, rising levels of household interest-bearing assets (which are 50% larger than interest-bearing liabilities) increase the negative impact of lower rates on savers. Moreover, because so much U.S. consumer debt is in the form of fixed rate mortgages, many of which have already been refinanced to very low payments, rate cuts have a limited ability to reduce interest expense. Finally, the psychological effects from monetary easing are also largely negative, as consumers take signs of Fed easing as a reason to worry about recession and to delay borrowing until rates fall further.

    In summary, we believe the net impact of further monetary easing may well be negative. However, we recognize that central banks do not subscribe to this view. Thus, we believe that further central bank easing, which will be either ineffective or even counterproductive, will contribute to an era of continued slow growth, low inflation and low interest rates in the decade ahead and beyond.

    Download the full article

    You should also read


    Assumption matrices

    Arranged in an easy-to-reference format, each LTCMA matrix provides our expectations for returns, volatilities and correlations.

    EUR matrices >

    USD matrices >

     

     

    Full report and exec summary

    Choose between a comprehensive analysis of our forecasts and critical investment themes, or a simpler overview of our macro and asset class assumptions.

    Download the original report >

    Access the executive summary >

     


    The next phase of China's growth

    China's GDP is on the cusp of middle income status. Discover the implications for financial markets, and whether it’s a good time to invest in China.

    Read the next article >

     

     

    Este website possui finalidade informativa, de natureza educacional, e não foi elaborado com o intuito de servir como recomendação para produtos ou estratégias de investimento em qualquer jurisdição. Ao acessar este conteúdo, você concorda com a finalidade pretendida. Todos os exemplos usados são genéricos, hipotéticos e apenas para fins ilustrativos. O J.P. Morgan Asset Management e suas afiliadas não sugerem que quem visita este website tome qualquer ação específica. Este conteúdo não é imparcial e está sendo fornecido em conexão com a publicidade dos serviços de gestão de recursos para fundos de investimento. Antes de tomar qualquer decisão financeira, o investidor deve buscar orientação de consultores financeiros, jurídicos, tributários e profissionais que levem em conta todas as circunstâncias particulares de cada investidor. As opiniões aqui descritas baseiam-se nas condições atuais de mercado e estão sujeitas a alterações sem aviso prévio. Acreditamos que as informações fornecidas aqui são confiáveis, mas não devem ser consideradas precisas ou completas e/ou servir como base para decisões de investimento. As visões e estratégias descritas podem não ser adequadas para todos os investidores.


    J.P. Morgan Asset Management é a marca comercial para a divisão de gestão de ativos do JPMorgan Chase & Co. e afiliadas no mundo.

    J.P Morgan Asset Management

    • Sitemap
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookie policy
    • Accessibility
    • Investment stewardship
    Decorative
    J.P. Morgan

    • J.P. Morgan Brazil
    • JPMorgan Chase

    Copyright © 2023 JPMorgan Chase & Co., all rights reserved.