Skip to main content
logo
  • Insights
    Overview

    Liquidity Insights

    • Liquidity Insights Overview
    • Case Studies
    • Partnership with fintechs
    • ESG Resources for Liquidity Investors
    • Leveraging the Power of Cash Segmentation
    • Cash Investment Policy Statement

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Currency
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Strategic Investment Advisory Group
  • Resources
    Overview
    • MORGAN MONEY
    • Global Liquidity Investment Academy
  • About us
    Overview
    • Our Leadership Team
    • Diversity, Opportunity & Inclusion
  • Contact us
  • LIQUIDITY INVESTORS
    • INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
Search
Menu
Search
You are about to leave the site Close
J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
CONTINUE Go Back

Initial market reaction suggests investors have taken some solace in the fact that rate hikes are not in any members’ base case, confirming an easing bias from the Fed.

The Federal Reserve delivered on market expectations and reduced the target federal funds rate by 0.25% to 3.50%-3.75% at its last meeting of the year. Cumulatively, the FOMC has cut policy rates by 75 bps this year. However, as we noted in our 2026 outlook: Difficult decisions facing a divided Fed, there are a range of views regarding the path of policy rates going forward as evidenced by the number in dissents among governors at the December meeting. Interim governor, Stephen Miran dissented in favor of a larger half percent cut, while Governors Schmid (Kansas City) and Goolsbee (Chicago) voted in favor of no further reductions. Moreover, outside of the twelve voting members, four members within the total FOMC body of nineteen whom submit projections, elected for no cuts, a few of which may be rotating onto the committee next year.

Notably, the small tweak in the statement stating “in considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments” to policy rates suggests a January reduction is unlikely. In addition, there were moderate changes to the committee’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) that tilt hawkish:

  • Growth was nudged higher by 0.1% to 1.7% for this year but jolted higher for 2026 to 2.3% from 1.8%. It’s expected the hit to growth in the fourth quarter driven by the government shutdown will contribute to growth next year, in addition to OBBBA stimulus.  
  • Unemployment rate forecasts were essentially unchanged.
  • Both headline and core PCE forecasts were nudged lower through next year. This year was adjusted to 2.9% and 3.0%, and to 2.4% and 2.5% for 2026, respectively. The committee continues to see tariffs as a one-time boost to inflation that should subside relatively quickly.
  • The median interest rate outlook maintained just one cut for next year and in 2027. That said, the most hawkish members see no further rate cuts through 2027 while the most dovish members see rates falling to 2.4% over that time.

During the press conference, Chairman Powell suggested a measured approach going forward, while acknowledging the wide range of views driven by their employment and inflation mandate at odds. It’s worth mentioning that Powell asserted that the drivers of stronger GDP growth alongside a more benign inflation outlook could be guided by productivity gains, though hesitant to declare these gains were driven by Artificial Intelligence…yet.  

Initial market reaction suggests investors have taken some solace in the fact that rate hikes are not in any members’ base case, confirming an easing bias from the Fed. In summary, while the Fed may be less active next year in adjusting policy rates, an easing bias likely continues to provide support for risk assets and slightly lower short to intermediate yields. However, investors would be wise to manage the range of outcomes next year, and therefore embrace active fixed income, disciplined risk control and careful positioning across the bond market. 

500bc671-d5ae-11f0-ba96-59f9403b4585
  • Economy
  • Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)
  • Federal Reserve
  • Interest Rates
  • Rate cuts
J.P. Morgan Asset Management

  • Investment stewardship
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Sitemap
J.P. Morgan

  • J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Chase

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.