Skip to main content
logo
Log in
Welcome
Log in for exclusive access and a personalized experience
Log in
Hello
  • My collections
    View saved content and presentation slides
  • Accounts and documents
    Digital servicing offering for active investors
  • Log out
  • Funds
    Overview

    Fund Explorer

    • SICAVs
    • Exchange-Traded Funds
    • Liquidity Funds

    Fund Information

    • Regulatory Documents
    • Regulatory Updates
  • Investment Strategies
    Overview

    Investment Options

    • Alternatives
    • Beta Strategies
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Liquidity
    • Multi-Asset Solutions

    Capabilities & Solutions

    • ETFs
    • Global Insurance Solutions
    • Pension investment solutions
    • Outsourced CIO
    • The power of active
    • Sustainable investing
    • Fixed income
  • Insights
    Overview

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Guide to Alternatives
    • Mid-Year Investment Outlook 2025
    • Why Alternatives?

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Alternatives
    • Asset Class Views
    • Equity
    • ETF Perspectives
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Sustainable Investing Insights
    • Strategic Investment Advisory Group

    ETF Insights

    • ETF Insights Overview
    • Guide to ETFs
  • Resources
    Overview
    • Center for Investment Excellence Podcasts
    • Library
    • Insights App
    • Webcasts
    • Morgan Institutional
    • Investment Academy
  • About us
    Overview
    • Diversity, Opportunity & Inclusion
    • Spectrum: Our Investment Platform
    • Our Leadership Team
  • Contact Us
  • English
  • Role
  • Country
Hello
  • My collections
    View saved content and presentation slides
  • Accounts and documents
    Digital servicing offering for active investors
  • Log out
Log in
Search
Menu
Search
You are about to leave the site Close
J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
CONTINUE Go Back

Over the last few years, there has been an increasing number of avenues for investors to align both their financial goals and their sustainability preferences – whether they want to factor in environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks, capture opportunities or help finance the transition to a more sustainable and inclusive economy. Below, we look at some of the most common approaches.

ESG integration is not a sustainable investment approach in itself, but instead is a component of many traditional investment strategies today. The term refers to the systematic assessment of financially material ESG factors that can affect a company’s bottom line in the investment analysis and decision-making process. ESG integration, however, does not change a strategy’s investment objective, exclude specific types of companies or constrain a strategy’s investable universe.

The growing use of ESG integration reflects the increasingly widespread understanding that ESG factors, such as climate risk, natural resources use, human capital management and business conduct, can have significant implications for a company’s long-term financial health, alongside more traditional factors, such as product demand. Investors who do not want to invest in sustainable strategies but do want managers to have a process that enables them to assess ESG risks in their investment processes, with the goals of managing risk and improving long-term returns, may wish to choose an ESG integrated approach.

Exclusionary strategies were the earliest approach to sustainable investing, emerging from religious investment approaches that required the exclusion of prohibited investments, such as gambling and alcohol stocks.

Today, many funds include restrictions on the ability of a fund manager to buy assets related to certain industries, such as weapons, tobacco, thermal coal extraction, unconventional oil and gas extraction, alcohol, and adult entertainment. These restrictions may be aligned with international norms that establish minimum standards of business practice, or may reflect the values of individual investors or groups of investors.

Some investment strategies use exclusions alone to reflect investors’ sustainability preferences. However, exclusions are also frequently just one component of approaches that seek to invest in companies with strong ESG practices or capitalise on sustainable opportunities, rather than only mitigating ESG risks or avoiding the worst offenders.

Positive tilt strategies include a larger allocation within their portfolios to stocks with higher ESG scores, typically seeking to maintain an ESG score that is above a defined threshold. The way asset managers determine their ESG scores varies, with some using scores from external providers and others using qualitative and/or quantitative scoring systems developed in house by investment professionals or by a dedicated sustainable investing team.

Best-in-class strategies rank companies in the investment universe within their sectors and then select the most sustainable companies within each sector. This process allows investors to build a portfolio of ESG leaders, while also avoiding large skews toward sectors more associated with strong ESG practices or better disclosure, thereby maintaining greater diversification.

Thematic strategies are designed to align with specific environmental and/or social objectives, predominantly investing in companies whose products and services address specific themes within these areas. Examples include strategies investing in companies providing climate change solutions or offering products that address inequality.

Impact strategies have a dual objective: to generate financial return and to achieve environmental and/or social impact. Such strategies set and report against specific impact metrics – for example, a climate change impact fund could track the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the use of portfolio companies’ products and services.

These descriptions of the main approaches to sustainable investing are intended only as an introduction. Within each category, there are wide variations, and the way that sustainable investment solutions are categorised is not standardised across the industry, so it is vital to look at individual approaches more closely before making an investment decision.

To help you understand which approach is right for you and how it might fit with existing investments in your portfolio, please speak to a financial adviser.

  • Education and regulation
  • ESG
  • Sustainable Investing
J.P. Morgan Asset Management

  • About us
  • Investment stewardship
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Sitemap
J.P. Morgan

  • J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Chase

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

Copyright 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.