jpm_asset_mgmt
  • Products

    Funds

    • Performance & Yields
    • Liquidity
    • Ultra-Short
    • Short Duration

    Solutions

    • Cash Segmentation
    • Separately Managed Accounts
    • Managed Reserves Strategy
    • Capitalizing on Prime Money Market Funds
  • Insights

    Liquidity Insights

    • Liquidity Insights Overview
    • Audio Commentaries
    • Case Studies
    • Leveraging the Power of Cash Segmentation
    • Cash Investment Policy Statement
    • China Money Market Resource Centre
    • PeerView Survey

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Market Updates

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Currency
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Sustainable Investing
  • Resources
    • MORGAN MONEY
    • Account Management & Trading
    • Multimedia
    • Announcements
    • Total Return Comparison Calculator
  • About us
  • Contact us
Skip to main content
  • English
  • Role
  • Country
  • MORGAN MONEY LOGIN
Search
Menu
CLOSE
Search
You are about to leave the site Close
J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
CONTINUE Go Back
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Market Insights Overview
  4. Market Updates
  5. On the Minds of Investors
  6. Which sectors perform best around an election?

  • Share
  • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Line
  • Print
  • Actions
  • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Line
    Print

Which sectors perform best around an election?

09/30/2020

Meera Pandit

Instead, in the long run, policy, not politics, should have a more lasting impact on sector returns.

Meera Pandit

Listen to On the Minds of Investors

09/30/2020

As we approach Election Day, investors look to best position their portfolios for the next administration. However, looking at sector performance after each presidential election since 2000, there is little discernible pattern based on the election outcome. 

For example, in the weeks following the 2016 election, cyclical sectors like financials, industrials, energy and materials outperformed the broader market. Yet, in 2000, more defensive sectors like consumer staples, health care, and utilities held up better. Both elections resulted in Republican presidents, but markets reacted differently. This is likely because markets do not like uncertainty, and regardless of the outcome, elections always reduce it—except in 2000. This created a more defensive environment compared to 2016, when results were known promptly. Additionally, elections don’t stop prevailing economic conditions from driving markets.  Declines across sectors after the 2008 election were likely due to the Financial Crisis, and technology’s sharp underperformance after the 2000 election was attributable to the bursting of the Tech Bubble. 

Instead, in the long-run, policy, not politics, should have a more lasting impact on sector returns. Looking at current policy proposals, both parties have sought anti-trust measures for some of the leading technology companies, so any outcome is likely to put pressure on the technology sector. Under a Trump administration, deregulation would likely continue, which has benefited financials and some of the more traditional energy companies. Yet, a multi-trillion dollar clean energy and infrastructure package under Biden could benefit clean or more diversified energy companies, renewables and create differentiation for ESG investors. Both administrations would likely pursue large infrastructure packages, which could lift materials and industrials. Although both candidates have promised to lower drug costs, a weakening of the Affordable Care Act under a Trump re-election could reduce the number of Americans with health care coverage, diminishing health care spending and damaging subsectors within health care. 

Ultimately, uncertainty is likely to foment market volatility and impact sector performance in the days and weeks leading up to and following the election, but lasting impacts on specific sectors are likely to come from policy changes over the course of the next four years. 

S&P sector performance after the 2016 election

Election Day to Nov. 30, 2016, Election Day = 100 

 

Source: Factset, Standard & Poor’s, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data are as of September 28, 2020.

0903c02a82a101d1

EXPLORE MORE

On the Minds of Investors

What investment questions are on the minds of investors? Explore the questions investors ask frequently and find answers at J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

Read more

Guide to the Markets

The J.P. Morgan Guide to the Markets illustrates a comprehensive array of market and economic histories, trends and statistics through clear charts and graphs.

Read more

Asset Class Views

Get quarterly commentary and in-depth analysis on equities, fixed income and other asset classes, written by our senior investment teams.

Read more
Markets Economy
J.P. Morgan Asset Management

  • Investment stewardship
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Binding corporate rules
  • Sitemap
  • Accessibility
Decorative
J.P. Morgan

  • J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Chase

READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

Copyright 2021 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.