Market Thoughts

Whiplash

by Richard Madigan
Chief Investment Officer
J.P. Morgan Private Bank

In brief

 

  • With the recent increase, we have returned to more normal levels of volatility
  • There is more than just higher levels of market volatility weighing on investor sentiment. Current uncertainty is centered on inflation and the pace of central bank tightening ahead
  • U.S. trade policy and a fear of tighter regulation ahead for technology companies are also weighing on sentiment. The current anxiety around trade policy is deserved, but fears related to tech feel overdone
  • We believe that markets have room to run higher. But with a variety of concerns still weighing on sentiment, we are in an environment where investor confidence will take time to rebuild

 

To say that investors currently feel whiplash is being kind. The anomaly across equity markets last year was the spectacular lack of volatility, but volatility is back this year, and it is taking a toll on sentiment. We have seen a confluence of rising concerns that have weighed on confidence, but some of these current hot topics are more relevant than others. I will touch on what I think are the more central issues below.

It is important to recognize that the rise we have seen in volatility has simply returned us to what I would characterize as normal levels (Figure 1). Ultimately, it is healthy—but getting to that realization is going to be a process. My word for markets this year is “endurance.” To borrow a line from Thomas Carlyle that seems appropriate for the current environment: “Endurance is patience concentrated.” And as my daughter would remind me: Patience is the key to joy.

This remains an unloved market, as investors have spent the past few years trying to anticipate the next recession. We’re not there yet. Over the past few months, we’ve gone through a false alarm around U.S. wage inflation, followed by a rapid correction in inverse and leveraged volatility strategies. We viewed that early February market sell-off as technically driven and took advantage of it to add to equity positions. We continue to hold those positions as markets trade in the same broad range.

Upfront, I want to emphasize that we remain constructive on the global economy, and our portfolio positioning reflects that view. That said, markets got off to too strong of a start in January. With higher levels of market volatility, valuations have come down both for equity and credit markets alike. Higher volatility creates and reflects uncertainty, which pushes up demanded risk premiums. However, there is more than just higher levels of market volatility weighing on investor sentiment.

Pros outweigh cons, risks have risen

Our economists expect solid and stable global growth over the next two years. That growth should support revenues and profits. We are keeping a close eye on capital expenditures, which can drive earnings. Corporate profits are important but so is business sentiment, perhaps more so currently. Business sentiment is one variable that, given the rising uncertainty around U.S. trade policy, we are watching carefully (Figure 2), not just with regard to investment, but also stock buybacks and hiring.

Current market uncertainty is centered on inflation and the pace of central bank tightening ahead. Investors fear central banks are ready to hit the brakes hard. While central banks are deliberately unwinding accommodative policy, they are beginning from a point of significant easing. “Less easy”—as I’ve said before—does not mean tight policy. The starting point matters.

While we see the European Central Bank stepping back from bond purchases late this year, we do not see higher policy rates until at least the middle of next year. Also, we believe the Bank of Japan remains “all in” on easy policy for now. The Federal Reserve is on track to continue to gradually raise policy rates, with a view that the distribution of risk they see ahead for U.S. growth skews to the upside. So far, so good.

Rising investor uncertainty also stems from a slowdown we are seeing in certain leading macro indicators, particularly in Europe (Figure 3). Ironically, the slower growth in some of these higher frequency indicators is what makes me feel good about the fact that developed market central banks do not need to tighten monetary policy more assertively; inflation is not running ahead of policymakers. Growth is slowing from very high levels; however, it remains above trend.

We expect global growth to be around +3.5% this year and next year; both years have potential for upside. Europe and Japan are likely to undershoot their 2% inflation targets this year and next. The Fed may overshoot its 2% inflation target—that is not said to be alarming. Jay Powell made this point in his first news conference as Chair in March. The Fed may tolerate greater symmetry around its 2% inflation target. Chair Powell presented a view that is bullish on the U.S. economy and not overly hawkish on policy. We agree.

If those concerns were not enough, U.S. trade policy and a fear of tighter regulation ahead for technology companies is also weighing on sentiment. Neither of these issues is going away quickly. There are a few key questions markets need to grapple with. Regarding trade policy: Is this more “bark than bite” and part of a negotiating ploy, or something worse? In the instance of big-tech and social media: Is the regulatory environment about to force a marked change to the business model?

No trade war and no trade peace

There is a Roman phrase I have always liked regarding noise that can spring from politics: bread and circuses. That figure of speech is used in a political context to represent winning public approval by distraction. We have seen quite a bit of distraction across continents recently. To borrow from a quote attributed to Lincoln: “…you cannot fool all the people all the time.”

Markets have been impressive in their ability to ignore political distraction, focusing for the most part on fundamentals, but when policy—and by extension fundamentals—gets dragged into the equation, markets quickly pay attention. We continue to see that around Brexit, not to mention recent elections globally. Today, the potential threat of a tit-for-tat global trade war should be considered a risk to underlying market fundamentals.

Washington is proposing the application of “maximum pressure” on China—as the U.S. Commerce Secretary emphasizes that tariffs are meant to lead to negotiations, not fights. The problem over the next few months is that until there is greater clarity around the details of what is being proposed and negotiated, there is nothing to anchor on except rhetoric.

It is obvious that a trade war is in no one’s interest. No one wins. I encourage you to read the history around the Great Depression and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. However, if current trade war policy-salvos are eventually viewed as more negotiating bark than bite, this too shall pass. That assumes everyone dragged to the table wants to play “let’s negotiate.” If trade policy concerns escalate into a series of rapid fire tariff-tantrums, sentiment can roll over further, as would markets. That is not our base case, but I expect the ride to be raucous.

A timeout for technology

Our investment thesis for owning technology is based on a view that we are in the early stages of a structural transformation that will continue to drive investment in the sector. We expect revenue, earnings and cash flow growth in tech to remain strong versus the broader market. Tech sector balance sheets, in aggregate, are some of the strongest across all U.S. sectors, and equity valuations in tech remain reasonable and in line with the broader market (Figure 4). I could not have said any of that about tech in 1998. Tech does not benefit from tax cuts to the same degree as the overall market, but we believe investors will continue to place high value on the sector’s organic earnings growth.

However, technology may find itself in an environment—like healthcare in 2016—where the sector is given a timeout by investors until we see what happens with regulation. For portfolios where we have U.S. technology as an overweight, we continue to hold onto positions. The sector has not sold off enough to make us want to add to positions, and we have not seen evidence that our fundamental investment thesis has changed—either because of a pullback in investment, or a stall in revenue and earnings growth.

So where does this leave us?

While markets are left with a mild case of whiplash, we are keenly focused on the fundamentals, which we continue to view as constructive. We are in the late stages of the current expansion and, as I’ve said before, every day further into this expansion brings us closer to the next recession. That said, we do not see a recession directly on the horizon.

And yet, anxiety continues to run through markets. Around issues like trade policy, the current anxiety is deserved. Around technology, some of it feels overdone—but there remains a lot of headline risk ahead of us. Current volatility will continue to create tactical investment opportunities for us across portfolios. Our most recent trades have been about repositioning risk, not chasing after markets.

As markets corrected in February, we added to equity positions. While we added to U.S. equity overweights, we also continued to add to core bonds and reduce exposure to high yield. We remain underweight fixed income, core bonds and duration in portfolios.

With the backup in interest rates in February, we added to core bonds for some downside protection alongside the addition to equities. That downside protection helped in late March. You cannot look at any of those trades in isolation; context comes only from looking at them holistically. Diversifying risk in a portfolio is crucial, especially in the later stages of the business cycle.

At a very simple level, we believe that stocks will outperform bonds this year, but with lower returns and more volatility than last year. We are overweight equities and underweight fixed income. We are not “all in” on stocks for the simple reason that we are late cycle and valuations are not cheap enough to warrant adding to current positions.

When we added to U.S. equity positions in early February, the forward price to earnings multiple on the S&P 500 was back to early 2016 levels—right around 16.5x; close to longer-term averages. If we get +6–8% earnings growth next year (Figure 5), the S&P is trading at close to a forward multiple of 15.5x looking into 2019.

I have been asked quite a bit why we do not own an explicit allocation to emerging market equities in portfolios, particularly as we continue to hold emerging markets debt. We prefer to focus our current equity overweight in the U.S. because we see stronger earnings growth in the U.S. this year. Valuations across global equity markets are in line with history, and I do not believe that emerging markets are inexpensive. Uncertainty around global trade policy has also played a part in our wanting to stay closer to the lower-beta in the U.S. equity market, relative to emerging markets.

We believe that markets have room to run higher, but with a variety of concerns still weighing on sentiment, we are in an environment where investor confidence will take time to rebuild. This earnings season should play a big part in helping investors refocus on fundamentals. Investor, consumer and business sentiment are going to be particularly important to keep an eye on as well. Whiplash takes time to recover from.

For ideas on how to incorporate these views into your portfolio in a way that is suitable for you, we invite you to contact your J.P. Morgan representative.

Biographies

 

Richard Madigan

Richard Madigan

Chief Investment Officer
Head of Investment Strategy
J.P. Morgan Private Bank

Nancy Rooney

Nancy Rooney

Global Head of Managed Solutions
J.P. Morgan Private Bank

Michael E. Gray

Michael E. Gray

Head of Fixed Income & Credit, CIO Team
J.P. Morgan Private Bank

Connect with us
We look forward to speaking with you about how we can put our local experience and global reach to work for you.

INDEX DEFINITIONS
All index performance information has been obtained from third parties and should not be relied on as being complete or accurate. Indices are shown for comparison purposes only. While an investor may invest in vehicles designed to track certain indices, an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index
The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index tracks investment grade government and corporate bonds globally.
MSCI Emerging Markets Index
The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure equity market performance in the global emerging markets. With 846 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.
MSCI EMU Index
The MSCI EMU Index (European Economic and Monetary Union) captures large and mid cap representation across the 10 Developed Markets countries in the EMU. With 247 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization of the EMU.
MSCI Japan Index
The MSCI Japan Index is a capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. With 321 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan.
MSCI USA Index
The MSCI USA Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the U.S. market. With 632 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in the United States.
S&P 500 Index
The S&P 500 is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks from a broad range of industries. The component stocks are weighted according to the total market value of their outstanding shares.

Opinions expressed are those of the author and may differ from those of other J.P. Morgan employees and affiliates. Neither J.P. Morgan nor any of its affiliates can represent that the statements or opinions expressed today will materialize.

Conflicts of interest will arise whenever JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or any of its affiliates (together, “J.P. Morgan”) have an actual or perceived economic or other incentive in its management of our clients’ portfolios to act in a way that benefits J.P. Morgan. Conflicts will result, for example (to the extent the following activities are permitted in your account): (1) when J.P. Morgan invests in an investment product, such as a mutual fund, structured product, separately managed account or hedge fund issued or managed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or an affiliate, such as J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.; (2) when a J.P. Morgan entity obtains services, including trade execution and trade clearing, from an affiliate; (3) when J.P. Morgan receives payment as a result of purchasing an investment product for a client’s account; or (4) when J.P. Morgan receives payment for providing services (including shareholder servicing, recordkeeping or custody) with respect to investment products purchased for a client’s portfolio. Other conflicts will result because of relationships that J.P. Morgan has with other clients or when J.P. Morgan acts for its own account.

Investment strategies are selected from both J.P. Morgan and third-party asset managers and are subject to a review process by our manager research teams. From this pool of strategies, our portfolio construction teams select those strategies we believe fit our asset allocation goals and forward looking views in order to meet the portfolio’s investment objective.

As a general matter, we prefer J.P. Morgan managed strategies. We expect the proportion of J.P. Morgan managed strategies will be high (in fact, up to 100 percent) in strategies such as, for example, cash and high-quality fixed income, subject to applicable law and any account-specific considerations.

While our internally managed strategies generally align well with our forward looking views, and we are familiar with the investment processes as well as the risk and compliance philosophy of the firm, it is important to note that J.P. Morgan receives more overall fees when internally managed strategies are included. We offer the option of choosing to exclude J.P. Morgan managed strategies (other than cash and liquidity products) in certain portfolios.

Risk

Bonds are subject to interest rate risk, credit and default risk of the issuer. Bond prices generally fall when interest rates rise.

As a reminder, hedge funds (or funds of hedge funds) often engage in leveraging and other speculative investment practices that may increase the risk of investment loss. These investments can be highly illiquid, and are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors, and may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. These investments are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds; and often charge high fees. Further, any number of conflicts of interest may exist in the context of the management and/or operation of any such fund. For complete information, please refer to the applicable offering memorandum.

Purpose of This Material

This material is for information purposes only. The information provided may inform you of certain investment products and services offered by J.P. Morgan’s private banking business, part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. The views and strategies described in the material may not be suitable for all investors and are subject to investment risks. Please read this Important Information in its entirety.

Confidentiality

This material is confidential and intended for your personal use. It should not be circulated to or used by any other person, or duplicated for non-personal use, without our permission.

Regulatory Status

In the United States, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively “JPMCB”) offer investment products, which may include bank-managed accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), a member of FINRA and SIPC. Annuities are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. JPMCB, JPMS and CIA are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.

In the United Kingdom, this material is issued by J.P. Morgan International Bank Limited (JPMIB) with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP, registered in England No. 03838766. JPMIB is authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. In addition, this material may be distributed by: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMCB”), Paris branch, which is regulated by the French banking authorities Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and Autorité des Marchés Financiers; J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA, regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority.

In Hong Kong, this material is distributed by JPMCB, Hong Kong branch. JPMCB, Hong Kong branch is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, we will cease to use your personal data for our marketing purposes without charge if you so request. In Singapore, this material is distributed by JPMCB, Singapore branch. JPMCB, Singapore branch is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Dealing and advisory services and discretionary investment management services are provided to you by JPMCB, Hong Kong/Singapore branch (as notified to you). Banking and custody services are provided to you by JPMIB. The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong, Singapore or any other jurisdictions. You are advised to exercise caution in relation to this document. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice.

With respect to countries in Latin America, the distribution of this material may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. Receipt of this material does not constitute an offer or solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. To the extent this content makes reference to a fund, the Fund may not be publicly offered in any Latin American country, without previous registration of such fund’s securities in compliance with the laws of the corresponding jurisdiction.

Non-reliance

We believe the information contained in this material to be reliable and have sought to take reasonable care in its preparation; however, we do not represent or warrant its accuracy, reliability or completeness, or accept any liability for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) arising out of the use of all or any part of this material. We do not make any representation or warranty with regard to any computations, graphs, tables, diagrams or commentary in this material, which are provided for illustration/reference purposes only. The views, opinions, estimates and strategies expressed in it constitute our judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. We assume no duty to update any information in this material in the event that such information changes. Views, opinions, estimates and strategies expressed herein may differ from those expressed by other areas of J.P. Morgan, views expressed for other purposes or in other contexts, and this material should not be regarded as a research report. Any projected results and risks are based solely on hypothetical examples cited, and actual results and risks will vary depending on specific circumstances. Forward looking statements should not be considered as guarantees or predictions of future events.

Investors may get back less than they invested, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Risks, Considerations and Additional information

There may be different or additional factors which are not reflected in this material, but which may impact on a client’s portfolio or investment decision. The information contained in this material is intended as general market commentary and should not be relied upon in isolation for the purpose of making an investment decision. Nothing in this document shall be construed as giving rise to any duty of care owed to, or advisory relationship with, you or any third party. Nothing in this document is intended to constitute a representation that any investment strategy or product is suitable for you. You should consider carefully whether any products and strategies discussed are suitable for your needs, and to obtain additional information prior to making an investment decision. Nothing in this document shall be regarded as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice (whether financial, accounting, legal, tax or other) given by J.P. Morgan and/or its officers or employees, irrespective of whether or not such communication was given at your request. J.P. Morgan and its affiliates and employees do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any financial transactions. Contact your J.P. Morgan representative for additional information concerning your personal investment goals. You should be aware of the general and specific risks relevant to the matters discussed in the material. You will independently, without any reliance on J.P. Morgan, make your own judgment and decision with respect to any investment referenced in this material.

Investing in fixed income products is subject to certain risks, including interest rate, credit, inflation, call, prepayment and reinvestment risk. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to substantial gain or loss.

Holders of foreign securities can be subject to foreign exchange risk, exchange-rate risk and currency risk, as exchange rates fluctuate between an investment’s foreign currency and the investment holder’s domestic currency. Conversely, it is possible to benefit from favorable foreign exchange fluctuations.

Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against loss.

J.P. Morgan may hold a position for itself or our other clients that may not be consistent with the information, opinions, estimates, investment strategies or views expressed in this document.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates may hold a position or act as market maker in the financial instruments of any issuer discussed herein or act as an underwriter, placement agent, advisor or lender to such issuer.

References in this report to “J.P. Morgan” are to JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide.

“J.P. Morgan Private Bank” is the marketing name for the private banking business conducted by J.P. Morgan.

If you have any questions or no longer wish to receive these communications, please contact your usual J.P. Morgan representative.