Skip to main content
logo
  • Investment Strategies

    Investment Options

    • Alternatives
    • Beta Strategies
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Multi-Asset Solutions

    Capabilities & Solutions

    • ETFs
    • Pension Strategy & Analytics
    • Global Insurance Solutions
    • Outsourced CIO
    • Sustainable Investing
  • Insights

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Guide to Alternatives
    • Market Updates
    • Guide to China

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Alternatives
    • Asset Class Views
    • Currency
    • Equity
    • ETF Perspectives
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Sustainable Investing
    • Strategic Investment Advisory Group

    Retirement Insights

    • Retirement Insights Overview
    • Essential Elements of a Sound Retirement System
    • Building Better Retirement Portfolios
  • Resources
    • Center for Investment Excellence Podcasts
    • Insights App
    • Library
    • Webcasts
    • Multimedia
    • Morgan Institutional
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • English
  • Role
  • Country
  • Morgan Institutional
    Search
    Search
    Menu
    You are about to leave the site Close
    J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
    CONTINUE Go Back
    1. EM Corporates: Emissions in Focus

    • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Line

    EM Corporates: Emissions in Focus

    07/08/2021

    Reuben Weislogel

    Despite continued growth, Emerging Market Corporates (CEMBI[1]) remain a misunderstood asset class. Often looked at through a simplistic lens, CEMBI is a highly diverse pool of bonds that incorporates ~800 issuers from ~60 different countries and is similar in size to both U.S. High Yield (HY) and Emerging Market Hard Currency Sovereigns ex-Quasis[2]. While it is broadly understood that CEMBI has shorter interest rate duration than U.S. Investment Grade (IG) Corporates, stronger fundamental metrics than U.S. HY[3], and higher rating-adjusted yields than both, less understood is how CEMBI differs from a sectoral and carbon emissions perspective. We believe, based on information from the MSCI ESG database on relative emission generation across the three asset classes, that the assumption that CEMBI companies are much higher-polluting, although widely held, is incorrect. In short, while higher emitting from a carbon intensity perspective[4], CEMBI’s higher relative emissions is primarily a function of its sectoral composition (i.e., larger weight to industrial-oriented sectors) and the impact of just ten very-high-carbon-intensity credits. In looking at the underlying data, CEMBI is revealed as a more nuanced asset class that not only offers investors attractive rating-adjusted yield and diversification, but also comparable emissions exposure to other fixed income asset classes. Additionally, we find that CEMBI offers active investors substantial latitude to drive change in company policy and disclosure via engaged capital allocation.

    Starting with the relative sectoral compositions, as shown in the chart below, CEMBI has a much higher exposure to “high emission” sectors relative to U.S. HY or U.S. IG. This gap is predominantly explained by the differences in the economic compositions of the underlying EM countries, inherent natural resource bases, disproportionate size of the natural resource companies, and overall economic development of the respective countries. Nevertheless, this difference significantly affects the aggregate carbon emissions and intensity of the CEMBI relative to other asset classes. Additionally, it contributes to a broader perception that CEMBI companies are generally less efficient from a carbon intensity perspective and that the overall asset class is systematically behind-the-curve when it comes to addressing emissions. However, the tilt towards higher-emission sectors obscures the differentiation that exists within each sector and what is happening at the company level. For instance, the underlying data shows that there are multiple sectors where CEMBI companies generate lower weighted average carbon intensities than either U.S. IG or U.S. HY (e.g., financials, pulp & paper).

    Source: J.P. Morgan, Bloomberg, Barclays, S&P, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Index composition data as of 4/30/2021.

    Adding onto this, the underlying data also reveals that, relative to U.S. IG and U.S. HY, CEMBI’s emission risk is uniquely concentrated in a small number names, and when these are excluded, overall carbon intensity drops materially. This concentration in high-emitting companies is mostly driven by the prevalence of very large (partially) state-owned-entities and national champions, both of which are more common in less-developed economies. When we strip out the top 10 emitters, the weighted average carbon intensity of CEMBI falls ~35%. Additionally, when comparing the ESG policies, targets, and disclosures of blue chip CEMBI companies to those in the S&P500 or U.S. IG index, we find little difference: the top end of CEMBI companies are in the same league as developed market peers. In our view, investors are presented with an attractive opportunity to sift through the underlying companies and gain exposure to a subset of emerging market corporates that have much more in common with U.S. IG from a carbon intensity perspective than the aggregate CEMBI statistics otherwise suggest. 

    Source: MSCI, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Emissions data from MSCI was sourced on 4/30/2021, however the underlying data is the most recent they have (mostly from 2019).

    To conclude, while negative political headlines and aggregate statistics often dominate the narrative around emerging market corporates, CEMBI is a much more nuanced asset class that remains an attractive opportunity set for active investors. When adjusting for differences in sectoral composition and the small number of outliers, CEMBI is much closer to U.S. IG in terms of its carbon intensity. Additionally, the top-end CEMBI companies are approaching emissions in a proactive, intentional, and transparent manner very similar to what is found in U.S. IG. We find that there is currently ample room for active investors to lend to high-carbon-efficiency CEMBI companies while helping shape the policies and disclosure levels of the less efficient issuers through engagement with the management teams.


     

    [1] “CEMBI” refers to the JP Morgan Corporate Emerging Markets Bond Index Broad Diversified

    [2] $1,491b for CEMBI, $1,396b for Emerging Market Sovereigns ex quasis, and $1,632m for U.S. HY (JPM)

    [3] CEMBI has >50% exposure to investment-grade rated companies (JPM)

    [4] While there are multiple methodologies for calculating carbon intensity, we use (Scope 1 + 2 CO2 Tons Emissions / USD Million Sales) to remain consistent with MSCI’s database. Scope 1 emissions are direct emissions that result from a company’s owned and controlled operations (e.g., facilities, company vehicles). Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions that result from the generation of energy purchased by a company. Scope 3 emissions, while not included in the traditional carbon intensity metrics, are other indirect emissions that occur in the value chain of a company. These are less reported, more difficult to measure, and often result in double counting when aggregating across sectors, regions, or asset classes.

    Material ID: 095i210507092907

    RELATED ARTICLES

    EM Corporate ratings are more stable than DM: Fitch

    Recent research shows EM corporate bond ratings are both more stable and less likely to default than their developed market peers. That may surprise some skeptics.

    Read more

    Ahead of the curve? The case for (some) emerging market local currency exposure

    With inflation set to moderate next year in both EMEA and Latin America, we see value in a number of local curves that currently embed higher levels of risk premium. As we approach 2022, we think our space is getting more interesting.

    Read more

    Add extra guacamole for a dollar!

    Emerging Markets Local Currency debt emerged as one of our best ideas at our most recent investment quarterly meeting. This isn't just about the US Dollar; we like what we see in local EM.

    Read more
    • Emerging Markets
    • Emerging Markets Debt
    J.P. Morgan Asset Management

    • About us
    • Investment stewardship
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookie policy
    • Binding corporate rules
    • Sitemap
    Opens LinkedIn site in new window
    J.P. Morgan

    • J.P. Morgan
    • JPMorgan Chase
    • Chase

    READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

    The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

    Copyright 2022 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.