Skip to main content
logo
  • Investment Strategies

    Investment Options

    • Alternatives
    • Beta Strategies
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Multi-Asset Solutions

    Capabilities & Solutions

    • ETFs
    • Pension Strategy & Analytics
    • Global Insurance Solutions
    • Outsourced CIO
    • Sustainable Investing
  • Insights

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Guide to Alternatives
    • Market Updates
    • Guide to China

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Alternatives
    • Asset Class Views
    • Currency
    • Equity
    • ETF Perspectives
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Sustainable Investing
    • Strategic Investment Advisory Group

    Retirement Insights

    • Retirement Insights Overview
    • Essential Elements of a Sound Retirement System
    • Building Better Retirement Portfolios
  • Resources
    • Center for Investment Excellence Podcasts
    • Insights App
    • Library
    • Webcasts
    • Multimedia
    • Morgan Institutional
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • English
  • Role
  • Country
  • Morgan Institutional
    Search
    Search
    Menu
    You are about to leave the site Close
    J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
    CONTINUE Go Back
    1. The implications for investors of the German election

    • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

    The implications for investors of the German election

    09/06/2021

    Tilmann Galler

    The federal election in Germany on 26 September not only marks the end to Angela Merkel’s 16-year reign as chancellor, but also brings the chance of a policy shift that could influence the future path of the German economy and the institutional set up of the European Union (EU).

    Investors should keep in mind that the direct impact of elections on German asset prices have historically been limited, due to continuity in leadership and economic policy. That Germany has had only three chancellors in the past 40 years reflects this stability.

    However, this election could be different. While current finance minister Olaf Scholz of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) is leading in the polls to be the next chancellor, followed by Armin Laschet for the Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and Annalena Baerbock for the Green Party, there is a high likelihood that for the first time in 60 years the German government has to be formed from a three-party coalition.

    Public support for the current “grand-coalition” between the CDU/CSU and the SPD has dropped from 69.4% in 2005 (the first Merkel government) to 47.6% in the latest polls. This rising unhappiness with both main parties will likely put an end to the coalition that governed Germany for the last eight years.

    The main German political parties and their policy goals

    To get a sense of what is at stake, we’ve summarised the policy objectives of the main parties contesting the election. 

    • CDU/CSU: The largest centre-right party is still viewed as conservative and more business friendly, although it adopted a more progressive policy regarding re-distribution and immigration in the Merkel years. The CDU is rejecting tax hikes and fiscal transfers to the EU, is proposing a cap on corporate taxation at 25%, and is committed to a balanced budget.
    • Free Democratic Party (FDP): The free market centre-right FDP is promoting more investment in technology and no tax increases, and wants to lower the regulatory and tax burden for corporations. Fiscally, the FDP is on the conservative side.
    • SPD: The largest centre-left party is championing more re-distribution and social transfers, and strongly opposes further austerity. It would raise the top income tax rate to 45%, and introduce a financial transaction tax and a wealth tax. The SPD is supportive of fiscal transfers inside the EU and promotes further fiscal integration.
    • Green Party: With a strong climate change agenda, the centre-left Green Party is promoting a significant increase in climate-related public investments and therefore opposes the debt brake. The party would set the top income tax rate at 48%. The Greens support the EU Green Deal and further fiscal transfers inside the EU, along with stronger regulation of the banking industry and the real estate market.
    • Die Linke: On the radical left, Die Linke is demanding a massive re-distribution of wealth, price controls in the real estate market and optionality to expropriate real estate companies. The party would introduce a minimum monthly income of EUR 1200 for people on welfare.

    Potential coalition governments

    The road to forming a new government in Germany looks difficult because of the voting system. Any party that receives more than 5% of the popular vote gets a representation in the Bundestag (the German parliament) that is equivalent to their vote share. Recent polls are indicating a further fragmentation of the political party system, with six parties expected to be above the 5% threshold and no party expected to receive more than 30% of the vote. Such a result would make the formation of a three-party coalition government very likely. 

    However, finding common ground between three or more parties so that a stable government can be formed will be a challenge. The breakdown of coalition talks between the CDU, FDP and Greens after the last election in 2017 is a good example of the difficulties faced in the negotiation process. Lengthy negotiations should be expected until the new government can be sworn in. In 2017, it took more than five months to form a government. 

    To see how things may pan out, we can look at the coalition options that are currently on the table. All parties have ruled out a coalition with the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, while the centre-right CDU/CSU and FDP have declared that they will not join a coalition with the left-wing Die Linke. This leaves us currently with six coalition scenarios, shown in Exhibit 1 in declining order, based on the number of seats in the Bundestag out of a total of 5981 .

    Exhibit 1: Potential coalitions based on latest polls

    Number of seats in Bundestag per party

    Source: www.bundestagswahl-2021.de, J.P. Morgan Asset Management; data as of 14 September 2021.

    Because of the slim majorities offered in most of the coalition scenarios, the still significant amount of undecided voters and the margin of errors in polling, it’s impossible at the current time to forecast with any high degree of confidence which parties will be involved in the new government. Nevertheless, the polls do suggest a remarkable shift in voter preference that shouldn’t be left unnoticed. Compared to the last election in 2017, the latest polls indicate on aggregate a huge shift in voter preference from the right side of the political spectrum (CDU, FDP) to the left.

    The two centre-left parties, the SPD and the Greens, are looking to gain more than ten percentage points in the popular vote, which should significantly strengthen the progressive and climate change agenda in the next elected parliament (Exhibit 2). After election day on 26 September, Germany is likely to move politically to the left. How far it moves will be determined by the number of left wing and left-leaning parties in the next coalition government.

    Exhibit 2: Election polls - gain and losses in popular vote vs. Last election in 2017

    In ppt; average of last 5 polls

    Source: www.bundestagswahl-2021.de, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, Data as of 14 September 2021

    Market Impact

    The weight of German equities in the MSCI Europe Index is close to 15%, and close to 3% in the MSCI World. Therefore, the market impact of the German elections should be limited. However, a significant shift in economic policy in Germany could have a longerterm impact on investment opportunities across Europe.

    The biggest risks for markets in this context would be a three-party coalition of the left that includes the radical left-wing party, Die Linke. In this case, German economic policy would be expected to shift dramatically towards bigger government and wealth re-distribution. Higher government spending, an increase in the minimum wage, higher taxes and significantly more regulation for the industrial sector can be expected in this scenario, which is a particular risk for the mid- to long-term prosperity and growth potential of the EU’s largest economy and could lead to some uneasiness among equity investors.

    With all three left-of-centre parties promoting price caps on rents, German real estate would also receive a significant hit in the event of an SPD/Green/Die Linke coalition. The Green Party additionally wants to increase energy standards, not only for new properties, but also for existing buildings.

    While a left coalition including Die Linke is certainly a risk for Germany, the EU’s view on such a government is probably less negative. All three left wing and left-leaning parties (the SPD, the Green Party and Die Linke) strongly favour a fiscal union and the continuation of the EU recovery fund.

    For government bond markets, the risk dynamics are a bit different. A new coalition government that includes the CDU/CSU, and particularly the FDP – which is a strong champion of austerity and the Maastricht criteria – could keep spread risk alive inside the currency union. A more left-leaning government, in contrast, would very likely lead to further spread compression between the periphery and German Bunds, driven by the perception of higher government spending in Germany and support for new less stringent fiscal rules in the EU, and the acceptance of fiscal transfers.

    Key take aways:

    • After election day, the polls suggest Germany is likely to move politically to the left
    • The formation of a new coalition government is complex and could take many months
    • Germany could introduce further climate policies and strengthen its support for EU integration
    • The direct market impact is likely to be limited, but any left-ofcentre coalition that includes the radical left-wing party, Die Linke, would be the biggest risk to markets
     
    1 The total number of seats in the Bundestag excluding overhang seats. Overhang seats are extra parliamentary seats awarded to a party if the number of direct seats won in the constituencies exceeds the number of seats the party is entitled to by the popular vote.

    09bg211609083315

    EXPLORE MORE

    On the Minds of Investors

    What investment questions are on the minds of investors? Explore the questions investors ask frequently and find answers at J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

    Read more

    Guide to the Markets

    The J.P. Morgan Guide to the Markets illustrates a comprehensive array of market and economic histories, trends and statistics through clear charts and graphs.

    Read more

    Asset Class Views

    Get quarterly commentary and in-depth analysis on equities, fixed income and other asset classes, written by our senior investment teams.

    Read more

    The Market Insights program provides comprehensive data and commentary on global markets without reference to products. Designed as a tool to help clients understand the markets and support investment decision-making, the program explores the implications of current economic data and changing market conditions.

     

    For the purposes of MiFID II, the JPM Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs are marketing communications and are not in scope for any MiFID II / MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. Furthermore, the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs, as non-independent research, have not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, nor are they subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own financial professional, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be appropriate to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not a reliable indicator of current and future results. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://am.jpmorgan.com/global/privacy. This communication is issued by the following entities: In the United States, by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. or J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc., both regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission; in Latin America, for intended recipients’ use only, by local J.P. Morgan entities, as the case may be.; in Canada, for institutional clients’ use only, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and territories except the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In the United Kingdom, by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other European jurisdictions, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. In Asia Pacific (“APAC”), by the following issuing entities and in the respective jurisdictions in which they are primarily regulated: JPMorgan Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, each of which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong; JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), this advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited, which is a member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Australia, to wholesale clients only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth), by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL 376919). For all other markets in APAC, to intended recipients only. For U.S. only: If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance. Copyright 2022 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

    J.P. Morgan Asset Management

    • About us
    • Investment stewardship
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookie policy
    • Binding corporate rules
    • Sitemap
    Opens LinkedIn site in new window
    J.P. Morgan

    • J.P. Morgan
    • JPMorgan Chase
    • Chase

    READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

    The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

    Copyright 2022 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.