logo
  • Insights

    Liquidity Insights

    • Liquidity Insights Overview
    • Audio Commentaries
    • Case Studies
    • Leveraging the Power of Cash Segmentation
    • Cash Investment Policy Statement
    • China Money Market Resource Centre
    • Intro to Liquidity Products

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Eye on the Market
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Market Updates
    • Guide to China

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Currency
    • Fixed Income
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Sustainable Investing
    • Strategic Investment Advisory Group
  • Resources
    • MORGAN MONEY
    • Account Management & Trading
    • Multimedia
    • Announcements
  • About us
  • Contact us
Skip to main content
  • English
  • Role
  • Country
  • MORGAN MONEY LOGIN
    Search
    Search
    Menu
    You are about to leave the site Close
    J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s website and/or mobile terms, privacy and security policies don't apply to the site or app you're about to visit. Please review its terms, privacy and security policies to see how they apply to you. J.P. Morgan Asset Management isn’t responsible for (and doesn't provide) any products, services or content at this third-party site or app, except for products and services that explicitly carry the J.P. Morgan Asset Management name.
    CONTINUE Go Back
    1. Are commodities still a good inflation hedge amid decarbonization?

    Are commodities still a good inflation hedge amid decarbonization?

    02/06/2021

    Kerry Craig

    Ian Hui

    Gareth Lam

    In Brief:

    • Higher inflation is currently a key risk that is top of mind for many investors. As such, the role of commodities has gained special interest given recent positive performance and the possible impacts of decarbonization policies.
    • Within commodities, oil, industrial metals and precious metals are the strongest performers during periods of low and rising inflation.
    • The transition to a carbon-neutral world will inevitably impact commodities and their role as an inflation hedge in portfolios. Still, we expect this to be gradual.

    Higher inflation is currently a key risk that is top of mind for many investors. The combination of still very loose fiscal policies, recovering private demand and a mismatch between supply and demand in pockets of the global economy may lead to inflation being much less transitory than many central bankers believe. Our view is that inflation pressures will recede in the second half of 2021 as base effects pass and supply catches up with demand. However, the risk of higher and more persistent inflation remains.

    Historically, gold and commodities, real assets and inflation-linked bonds have been used to protect portfolios from the effects of inflation (Exhibit 1). The strong 10-year correlation of 0.73 between the year-over-year (y/y) growth of the Bloomberg Commodities Index (BCOM) and the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) highlights the effectiveness of commodities as an inflation hedge. The role of commodities has gained special interest given recent performance and the possible impacts of decarbonization policies. We explore whether energy commodities and industrial metals remain effective in reducing inflation risks in this context.

    EXHIBIT 1: COMMODITIES HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN AN INFLATION HEDGE
    YEAR-OVER-YEAR GROWTH OF BCOM VS. U.S. CPI

    Source: Bloomberg, BLS, Dow Jones, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 05/10/21.

    The impact of decarbonization

    Many countries and regions are now stepping up their climate ambitions and the Leaders Summit on Climate 2021, hosted on Earth Day in April, saw a renewed commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally and achieve net-zero emissions by the middle of this century (see our Achieving Net Zero series introductory paper here).

    The transition to a low-carbon economy suggests rethinking whether commodities will remain an effective hedge against inflation given the high weight of energy within commodity indices.1 Looking beyond the index, oil is the strongest performing commodity during periods of low and rising inflation, followed by industrial and precious metals (Exhibit 2). The next sections focus on energy and industrial metals.  

    EXHIBIT 2: ENERGY, INDUSTRIAL METALS AND PRECIOUS METALS OUTPERFORMED TRADITIONAL ASSET CLASSES DURING PERIODS OF LOW AND RISING U.S. INFLATION
    ARITHMETIC AVERAGE OF NOMINAL ANNUAL RETURNS OF DIFFERENT ASSET CLASSES FOR YEARS IN WHICH INFLATION WAS BELOW MEDIAN AND RISING, 1992 TO 2020

    Source: Barclays, Bloomberg, Dow Jones, FactSet, U.S. Federal Reserve, J.P. Morgan, MSCI, Strategas/Ibbotson, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Median inflation was 2.34% in measured period. Rising or falling inflation distinction is relative to the previous year. Low and rising inflation occurred in 6 of the 30 measured years. *EM debt based on the period 1994-2020. Based on Shiller S&P 500 Composite total return index (U.S. equities), MSCI AC World Index (World equities), Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate (Global bonds), Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate U.S. Treasury Index (U.S. govt. bonds), Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Index (U.S. inv. grade), Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index (U.S. high yield), J.P. Morgan EMBI Global (EM debt) and S&P GSCI (Commodities). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current and future results. Data reflect most recently available as of 05/10/21. 

    Energy

    Energy, more specifically oil, has historically moved very closely with inflation given the higher weight in the CPI inflation basket and the flow on effects as this commodity is used in all parts of the economy, from fueling transportation to heating homes to powering factories.

    However, this relationship will likely be challenged in the future, as energy demand changes from fossil fuels to renewable sources. It’s the pace of this change that matters. While the clean energy trend has gained significant momentum in equity markets since 2020, it has not been matched with the same momentum in displacing the use of fossil fuels. The main factors slowing the shift are technology, economic incentives and the availability of adequate infrastructure.

    The advancement of clean energy technology to a point where it competes with fossil fuels on a cost basis is a relatively recent phenomenon. Still, the economics of clean energy investment are not always favorable in every case. For example, for heavy industries, one of the largest contributors to carbon emissions, the existing processes based on fossil fuels are generally highly efficient, due to the commoditized nature of its products, limiting the appeal of substituting with clean energy sources. Thus, it is hard to justify overhauling entire processes to use clean energy unless there are mandated changes or policy incentives.

    The infrastructure to support clean energy takes time to build. Despite the recent push by governments globally, it will still be some time before clean energy is able to fully replace fossil fuels. While the share of fossil fuels as total energy consumption declines, and if the global economy continues to grow, the absolute quantity of fossil fuels needed could still rise, albeit at a slower pace than nominal GDP growth. This slow transition, combined with the fact that industry consumes 29% of total final energy, implies  there will still be a strong demand base for energy commodities for some time to come.

    On the consumer demand side, the accelerating trend of electric vehicles (EVs) has benefited industrial metals demand but has led to decreased use of, and will continue to displace, fossil fuel-intensive internal combustion vehicles. Manufacturing and technology improvements should see the price disparity between EVs and internal combustion vehicles narrow. However, there is still a huge variation in prices among regions. Outside of the largest developed economies, the continued growth in EV penetration will still be dependent on the extent of local policy support such as tax incentives and EV infrastructure construction.

    On the supply side, though the global investment in oil and gas supply has been gradually decreasing since 2014, investment plummeted in 2020 (Exhibit 3) alongside demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. The long lead times in supply often do not match the shorter variations in demand, potentially creating supply-demand imbalances in the future. In the near term, this could lead to higher prices for both oil and gas if global economies recover to their pre-pandemic levels, and we have yet to see significant and concrete clean energy transition policies being put in place. While we believe that energy commodities’, and specifically oil’s, role as an inflation hedge will be eroded by decarbonization, this will likely be a long process.

    EXHIBIT 3: GLOBAL NOMINAL INVESTMENTS IN OIL AND GAS UPSTREAM
    USD BILLIONS, 2010 TO 2020

    Source: International Energy Agency, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 05/10/21. 

    Industrial metals

    The other side of the decarbonization coin is industrial metals. As climate change policies take priority, governments are increasing green infrastructure spending to support the broader use of renewable energy and EVs. This has boosted the demand outlook for industrial metals, such as copper, aluminum, lithium, etc., as EVs and renewable power plants are very metal-intensive. For example, renewable energy systems can consume five times more copper than conventional energy systems, and the average battery EV consumes around 60kg more copper than a similarly sized internal combustion vehicle.

    In the U.S. for example, the USD 2.25trillion American Jobs Plan proposed by U.S. President Joe Biden includes metals-intensive “green” spending as well. The plan proposes a USD 174billion investment in the EV sector, to establish a fully integrated domestic supply chain spanning from raw materials to batteries, as well as sales rebates and tax incentives for consumers to buy American-made cars. If passed, this investment would entail the construction of 500,000 EV charging stations by 2030, the replacement of 50,000 diesel transit vehicles and the full electrification of the federal vehicles fleet and 20% of the U.S. school bus fleet. Moreover, the plan would also include a 10-year extension for tax credits for wind, solar and other renewable energy projects.

    The expectations of the increased demand from these initiatives has boosted the price of industrial metals since 2020. The recent rise in industrial metal prices has tracked well with the rise in the equity prices of EV and renewable energy companies since 2020, showing that many investors expect the decarbonization initiatives to bring huge demand for industrial metals. However, the demand created by these policies may not displace the traditional fundamentals, such as global industrial production, U.S. dollar strength and inflation for many years.

    The estimated share of green demand from the total demand for industrial metals has yet to reach a level that could drive a structural rise in prices. As seen in Exhibit 4, the green demand share of total in 2020 for copper, nickel and aluminum was estimated to be 6.3%, 5.7% and 3.8%, respectively. For comparison, when the industrialization of China began to drive significant increases in copper prices in 2004, China’s demand share of the total was estimated to be around 21%. Looking back at previous supercycles, the structural demand share of the total from the catalysts were generally at similar levels as well. Based on the current trajectory, the green demand share of metals could reach the critical level by the early 2030s, but there are still risks that would impact this assumption even if the overall decarbonization trajectory is maintained.

    EXHIBIT 4: ESTIMATED "GREEN" DEMAND SHARE OF COPPER OVER NEXT 5 YEARS
    % OF TOTAL 

    Source: BNEF, Carbon-neutral Pathways for the United States, CRU, IHS, J.P. Morgan Commodities Research, NEA, Tsinghua University's Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy (3Es), Wood Mackenzie, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data reflect most recently available as of 05/10/21.

    One such risk is the substitution between different metals or outright reduction in the use of metals (also called de-contenting) in these new clean technologies. For example, certain EV makers have shifted from a nickel-based battery to an iron-based one to reduce costs, even though EVs have more range with a nickel-based battery. In solar photovoltaic (PV) applications, higher silver prices led to the reduced use of the metal in PV applications. As a result, even though global solar capacity rose by 20% y/y in 2020, the amount of silver in PV applications grew by less than half this rate. Directly relating the pace of the progress of green initiatives to the pace of industrial metals demand growth is complicated by the substitution and de-contenting in these technologies.

    As a result, despite strong momentum from the decarbonization initiatives in recent years, the performance of industrial metals could still be driven by the traditional fundamentals. 

    Investment implication

    Commodity prices should be supported by the improving economic cycle and will continue to add to portfolio diversification and inflation protection given the long timeframe applied to decarbonization. 

    However, the strong rally in prices and potential of fading demand from China amid changes in policy support measures have created downside risk to industrial metals. These near-term pressures should be offset by rising demand in other locations as the global economic recovery becomes more synchronized. This could also lift energy prices if supply remains constrained by underinvestment.

    Over the longer term, if the current trajectory of decarbonization continues, the approach of using commodities as a hedge will become more nuanced and will move away from commodity indices with high weights to fossil fuels and low weights to commodities crucial to the growth in renewable energy. However, the correlation between inflation and industrial metals is one that should continue to hold. 

    1 Energy commodities are 29.97% of the Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM) and approximately 61.71% of the S&P GSCI, respectively.

    0903c02a82b2760b

    EXPLORE MORE

    On the Minds of Investors

    What investment questions are on the minds of investors? Explore the questions investors ask frequently and find answers at J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

    Read more

    Guide to the Markets

    The J.P. Morgan Guide to the Markets illustrates a comprehensive array of market and economic histories, trends and statistics through clear charts and graphs.

    Read more

    Asset Class Views

    Get quarterly commentary and in-depth analysis on equities, fixed income and other asset classes, written by our senior investment teams.

    Read more

    The Market Insights program provides comprehensive data and commentary on global markets without reference to products. Designed as a tool to help clients understand the markets and support investment decision-making, the program explores the implications of current economic data and changing market conditions. 

    For the purposes of MiFID II, the JPM Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs are marketing communications and are not in scope for any MiFID II / MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. Furthermore, the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs, as non-independent research, have not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, nor are they subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.

    This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own financial professional, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be appropriate to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not reliable indicators of current and future results.

    J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

    To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://am.jpmorgan.com/global/privacy.

    This communication is issued by the following entities:

    In the United States, by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. or J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc., both regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission; in Latin America, for intended recipients’ use only, by local J.P. Morgan entities, as the case may be. In Canada, for institutional clients’ use only, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and territories except the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In the United Kingdom, by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other European jurisdictions, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. In Asia Pacific (“APAC”), by the following issuing entities and in the respective jurisdictions in which they are primarily regulated: JPMorgan Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, each of which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong; JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), this advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited, which is a member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Australia, to wholesale clients only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth), by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL 376919). For all other markets in APAC, to intended recipients only.

    For U.S. only: If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

    Copyright 2022 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

    • Market Bulletins
    J.P. Morgan Asset Management

    • Investment stewardship
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookie policy
    • Binding corporate rules
    • Sitemap
    Decorative
    J.P. Morgan

    • J.P. Morgan
    • JPMorgan Chase
    • Chase

    READ IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. CLICK HERE >

    The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

    Copyright 2022 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.