Global Fixed Income Views 1Q 2020
Themes and implications from the Global Fixed Income, Currency and Commodities Investment Quarterly
- After a thaw in the trade war and a year of three Federal Reserve rate cuts, along with easing by dozens of other central banks, we have lowered the probability of Recession to 25%.
- Lower interest rates freed up U.S. consumers to spend and save, while emerging market rate cuts limited trade war-induced damage; Europe and Japan, however, still struggle.
- Sub Trend Growth is our likeliest scenario (55% probability) as global growth bottoms, including in the emerging economies—but we can’t see the next impulses that would ratchet growth higher.
- Among our top picks: Emerging market debt, focused on local currency; higher rated short-duration securitized credit, including non-agency CMBS; select investment grade credit and U.S. Treasuries, with yields expected to trade around current levels.
SCENARIO PROBABILITIES (%)
In retrospect, it was all so clear. The Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) pivot at the start of 2019 told us the central banks recognized they had little choice but to reverse their tightening policies of 2015–18 in an effort to offset the impact of the escalating trade war and tariffs. And that’s exactly what they did. Throughout 2019, as tariffs were increased and trade tensions escalated, the Fed cut rates three times and soothed the markets. And it wasn’t just the Fed. Globally, 40 other central banks cut rates a combined total of 63 times, for a cumulative 3,000-plus basis points (bps) in easing. They literally flooded the global markets and economy with liquidity. And then, like a holiday miracle, the U.S. and China sought to ease trade tensions by working toward a phase one deal. Suddenly, as we head into 2020, the combination of overwhelming central bank easing and the de-escalation in trade tensions has provided a powerful backdrop to the markets. For the participants at our December 11 Investment Quarterly (IQ) in New York, the big question was whether these factors were enough to turn the global economy upward, with the markets to follow.
There was significant criticism at the start of the year that the central banks had very little firepower left to offset any slowdown. That proved to be a serious underestimation. In the U.S. alone, the 75bps in interest rate cuts led to a surge in home mortgage refinancing that freed up income for consumers to spend on housing and durable goods. Further, the reduced cost of debt servicing strengthened consumer balance sheets.
But perhaps the biggest economic surprise was in emerging market (EM) economies. As China struggled to manage its tariffs-induced economic slowdown, the other emerging economies were expected to get caught in its downdraft. This was true to some extent, but the tremendous amount of rate cutting (over 2,800bps in the emerging markets) and some fiscal stimulus out of China, Asia and Europe helped to limit the downside. This can be seen in the greater resilience of EM manufacturing purchasing managers’ indices (PMIs) vs. those in the developed market (DM) economies.
Before we get too optimistic on the current state of play, though, let’s not forget that Europe is still struggling and Japanese growth has been dragged down by the consumption tax hike. While it’s nearly impossible to identify a European country with the ability and appetite for a fiscal spend, any fiscal package in Japan will result in only a small boost to growth.
Meanwhile, the central banks are tripping over one another to tell us that they are on hold and drawing a line under the amount of accommodation and number of unconventional tools they are willing to deploy. Both the Fed and the European Central Bank have made it clear that the politicians must step in and help. Will it be a trade compromise? Concerted borrowing and fiscal stimulus? Or some form of lasting structural reform?
The probability of Recession had to come down from 40% to 25% in acknowledgment of the quantity of global central bank ease and the bias for the U.S. and China to try to maintain some middle ground. We did not reduce it further because, one, those in the central banking community are telling us they are reluctant to ease further—they prefer help on the fiscal side or through structural reform—and, two, the devil will be in the details of any trade compromise.
We consequently increased the probability of Sub Trend Growth from 40% to 55%. We have to appreciate that after a two-year downdraft the global economy is bottoming. This is particularly true in the emerging economies, where the BRITs (I couldn’t resist: not the UK after Brexit, but Brazil, Russia, India and Turkey) are contributing the most to the EM growth pickup.
The tail probabilities of Above Trend Growth and Crisis remain just that at 10% each. Significant global fiscal stimulus seems as unlikely as the central banks withdrawing all their monetary accommodation.
The biggest risk remains on the trade front. If China and the U.S. cannot agree to a status quo with modest de-escalation, and/or the U.S. looks at putting tariffs on Europe or Latin America, the global economy would invariably shift downward.
As we roll into 2020, the U.S. general election will take center stage, with the campaigning and rhetoric commencing in earnest. An early look suggests that it will be difficult to find a moderate who can win.
What a difference a quarter makes—or, more to the point, my goodness, how the combination of dramatic central bank ease combined with positive trade rhetoric can alter one’s views. Our bias has shifted from defensive to more focused risk seeking.
Emerging market debt surfaced as our top choice. We favor segments of the market that lagged the rally in corporate bonds; for example, emerging market currencies look convincingly left behind. Local emerging market debt (Russia, Mexico, Peru and Indonesia) and currencies were our top pick. Not far behind were the securitized markets (structured credit and collateralized mortgage-backed securities [CMBS]), and then investment grade (IG) corporate bonds and taxable municipals, as foreign investors look for incremental quality yield over U.S. Treasury debt. This is not to say we were particularly bearish on interest rates. Rather, we believe that with the central banks on hold, rates will remain anchored around current levels (U.S. 10-year: 1.5%–2.0%).
After the last IQ, we positioned portfolios up in quality given prevailing risks and valuations. While risks have diminished, valuations are priced for more than our 55% probability of “Goldilocks.” We will add some risk on the margin in the sectors noted but are aware that it is late cycle and valuations are higher ... and that the central bank “put” may not be as powerful if there is another downturn.
SCENARIO PROBABILITIES AND INVESTMENT IMPLICATIONS: 1Q20
Every quarter, lead portfolio managers and sector specialists from across J.P. Morgan’s Global Fixed Income, Currency & Commodities platform gather to formulate our consensus view on the near-term course (next three to six months) of the fixed income markets. In daylong discussions, we review the macroeconomic environment and sector-by-sector analyses based on three key research inputs: fundamentals, quantitative valuations and supply and demand technicals (FQTs). The table below summarizes our outlook over a range of potential scenarios, our assessment of the likelihood of each and their broad macro, financial and market implications.
Would you like to download the full PDF?
JPMorgan China Income Fund
To provide investors with income and long-term capital growth by investing at least 70% of its non-cash assets in (a) equity securities of companies which are based in, listed on any stock exchange of, or operate principally in the PRC and that the Investment Manager expects to pay dividends and (b) Chinese debt securities issued and/or distributed in or outside the PRC.