Skip to main content
JPAM_logo
  • Funds

    Fund Listing

    • Fund Explorer
    • Fund Distribution
    • Fund Documents

    Featured Funds

    • Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
    • Income Fund
    • Multi Income Fund
    • Future Transition Multi-Asset Fund
    • Global Equity Solutions
  • Insights

    Market Insights

    • Market Insights Overview
    • Guide to the Markets
    • Weekly Market Recap
    • On the Minds of Investors
    • Guide to China
    • Multimedia

    Portfolio Insights

    • Portfolio Insights Overview
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Global Asset Allocation Views
    • Global Fixed Income Views

    Retirement Insights

    • Retirement Insights Overview
    • Principles for a Successful Retirement
    • Building Better Retirement Portfolios
    • Are you letting volatility derail your retirement plan?
  • Investment Ideas
    • Managing Volatility
    • Growth Strategy
    • Income Strategy
    • Retirement and long-term investing
    • Sustainable Investing
  • Resources
    • Announcements
    • Forms & Literature
    • Investment Glossary
    • Library
    • Insights App
    • WhatsApp Communication
  • About Us
    • Awards
  • Partner With Us
  • Language
    • English
    • 中文/ Chinese
  • Role
  • Country
  • Search
    Search
    Menu
    1. Why Asia ex-Japan Equities Deserve a Second Look – Part I

    Why Asia ex-Japan Equities Deserve a Second Look – Part I

    21/02/2022

    Clara Cheong

    In brief

    • Asia ex-Japan (AXJ) equities lagged significantly last year, underperforming  both developed market (DM) and emerging markets (EM) equities, ending the year in negative territory at -4.7%.
    • In this first part of a two-part paper, we explore the common push-backs to investing in AXJ and broader EM equities as we enter a monetary tightening regime in the U.S.
    • We address why we think things are different this time for AXJ countries, as starting macroeconomic conditions are more favorable than before.
    • Specifically, we see (a) potential for growth differentials between AXJ and DM equities to continue to narrow, (b) improved current account balances, (c) higher real rate differentials and (d) cheaper starting valuations of AXJ currencies since 2013.
    • The second paper of this two-part series will be a deeper dive into the year-to-date (YTD) performance, valuations, reasonableness of the earnings outlook for AXJ equities and conclude with investment implications.

    Introduction

    Asia ex-Japan (AXJ) equities lagged significantly last year, underperforming DM equities by 26.5% and the generic EM equity index by 2.25%, ending the year in negative territory at -4.7% (Exhibit 1). While there were individual country winners like India and Taiwan, they were not enough to offset the weakness that resulted from regulatory headwinds and the shift toward a more sustainable growth model in China. In ASEAN, intolerant COVID-19 policies significantly curtailed mobility, impacting consumption and slowing down the pace of economic recovery.

    With other historically significant EM headwinds surfacing as we enter the new year—think higher U.S. real rates, less accommodative monetary policies, a stronger dollar—we thought it would be useful to revisit the case for AXJ vs. DM equities in the context of these headwinds and investigate why we think things can be different this time.

    EXHIBIT 1: ASIA AND EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES UNDERPERFORMED IN 2021
    EQUITY RETURNS IN 2021 – GROWTH OF 100

    Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 31/12/21.

    EXHIBIT 2: POSITIVE GROWTH CONDITIONS PROVIDE A HEALTHY EARNINGS BACKDROP FOR AXJ AND EM EQUITIES
    AVERAGE MONTHLY RETURNS UNDER SIMILAR GROWTH REGIMES

    Source:  Bloomberg, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Markit Global PMI, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
    Data starts in December 1999 and reflects most recently available as of 14/02/22. ^Environment: Expansionary; Pace of Growth: Moderating is defined as above 3-month average levels of J.P. Morgan Global New Orders PMI, with negative momentum in the 3-month moving average of the series. *Cashflow return = Dividends + Share count change.

    Where are we in the global cycle?

    While history doesn’t exactly repeat itself, it often rhymes. Evaluating periods in the past that resemble conditions that we have today, i.e. still strong but moderating pace of growth, has shown that these have often been challenging periods for the valuation component of returns. However, as growth remains robust, the earnings component should still be strong enough to more than compensate for the losses from contracting multiples. Exhibit 2 shows that these conditions have typically been encouraging for equity-bond relative returns and underscores our preference for the former vs. the latter in the asset allocation hierarchy. AXJ and EM equities have historically generated stronger excess returns vs. the U.S. 10-year Treasury bond compared to their DM equity counterparts.

    A deeper dive into growth differentials

    A common concern that is often raised is that the GDP growth differential between AXJ and developed markets has continued to fall and that dynamic could pose as a headwind to the outperformance of AXJ vs. DM equities.

    Firstly, it is important to know that economic composition may not necessarily be the same as equity index composition. Hence, it should follow that the topline growth of an equity region would depend on where that growth is coming from. In an increasingly globalized world, it is plausible that companies listed on the AXJ exchange source their revenues from all over the globe. Rather than focusing on GDP growth differentials, we can more directly map out the forward-looking growth trajectory of an equity region by breaking down its revenue sources by country and looking specifically at the growth path of those countries, i.e. create a blended Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) series for each region weighted by their respective geographical revenue contributions. Taking it one step further, we can also break down how much of an equity index is linked to manufacturing vs. services. We believe that this is a more precise measure of the expected growth path of an equity index.

    EXHIBIT 3: ASIA EX-JAPAN EQUITIES TYPICALLY OUTPERFORM DM WHEN GROWTH DIFFERENTIALS ARE NARROWING SEQUENTIALLY
    SECTOR AND GEOGRAPHICAL REVENUE BLENDED RELATIVE PMI DIFFERENTIALS

    Source: Bloomberg, Haver, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 31/01/22.

    Earlier in the pandemic (2020), the relative growth differentials between AXJ and DM equities using this blended index were skewed in favor of AXJ. This is because AXJ countries reacted swiftly with a heavy-handed approach. Borders and activity within were shut down very quickly to contain the virus and not overwhelm their health care systems. However, as developed markets learned to co-exist with the virus, AXJ continued to adopt a strict approach with closed borders and mandatory quarantines. When the Delta variant hit in mid 2021, growth differentials started to diverge in favor of developed markets as a result of this approach. However, as AXJ economies started to understand the virus and became more well equipped to deal with each subsequent wave, the growth differentials have started to narrow. We believe that AXJ economies will continue to reopen as they learn to co-exist with the virus, and with China pivoting to a more accommodative monetary and fiscal policy stance, forward-looking growth expectations in the region look brighter than before.

    Historically, when our measure of  growth differentials between AXJ and DM equities are more positive than average and the 3-month trend of the narrowing of the differentials is positive, this has seen AXJ equities outperform DM equities by an average of +1.3% over the next 12 months. If we just look at the 3-month trend in isolation, when it has been on a positive trajectory historically, AXJ has typically outperformed DM equities by an average of +0.4% over the next 6 months.

    Can AXJ equities weather higher U.S. real rates?

    It is true that relative to developed markets, AXJ equities demonstrate a higher negative sensitivity to rising U.S. real rates, as evidenced by negative and statistically significant betas across the various geographical components (Exhibit 4). However, it is also important to note that the relative sensitivities vary across the different components of AXJ, with Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore demonstrating the least relative sensitivity to rising U.S. real rates vs. DM equities, while Indonesia and Philippines are about 4-5x more sensitive. Within sectors, the most sensitive sector is Real Estate, while Industrials and Financials have about half the sensitivity to rising U.S. real rates.

    Australian, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore equity indices are heavily dominated by Financials, with about 33 to 50% of their respective market capitalizations in the sector. This helps to explain why the overall sensitivity of these markets to higher U.S. real rates are lower because higher rates generally benefit net interest margins.

    We think it is likely that AXJ countries can benefit from stronger U.S. growth and weather higher U.S. rates better than before because macro stability in the region has improved relative to the 2013 taper tantrum episode. The vast majority of AXJ constituent countries saw improvements in their current account balances today vs. 2013 (Exhibit 5), apart from Philippines and Malaysia. 

    EXHIBIT 4: SENSITIVITY TOWARD U.S. REAL RATES VARIES AMONG ASIAN EQUITIES
    10Y RELATIVE TO MSCI WORLD BETA TO U.S. REAL RATES

    Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Betas are calculated using weekly data over the past 10 years and all betas are statistically significant at the 5% alpha level.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 10/02/22.

    Indonesia ran a current account deficit of -3.5% on average in 2013. Its dependence on external funding heading into a period where U.S. real rates reset abruptly higher was what led to a prolonged episode of currency depreciation. 

    EXHIBIT 5: CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCES HAVE IMPROVED SINCE 2013
    CURRENT ACCOUNT AS A % OF GDP

    Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Betas are calculated using weekly data over the past 10 years and all betas are statistically significant at the 5% alpha level.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 10/02/22.

    Moreover, with markets now pricing in close to seven rate hikes in 2022, we think the bulk of the pain in terms of rising real rates is behind us. On the bright side, longer-term inflation expectations (5y5y forward) have remained remarkably well anchored at around 2.5% even as shorter-term inflation prints have spiked. 

    EXHIBIT 6: ASIA EX-JAPAN VS. U.S. REAL RATE DIFFERENTIALS ARE MUCH WIDER TODAY COMPARED TO 2013
    MSCI ASIA EX-JAPAN VS. U.S. REAL RATE DIFFERENTIAL OVER TIME

    Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 15/02/22.

    Let’s address FX too

    The concern about the impact of rising U.S. real rates on AXJ FX returns is a valid one. AXJ FX accounts for close to 20% of AXJ equities’ volatility, while DM FX’s share of DM equity volatility is closer to ~10%. Hence, FX is an important consideration when investing in AXJ equities.

    Real rate differentials between AXJ and the U.S. have made a comeback in more recent time periods in explaining relative FX returns (with R squares rising from 0% over a 5Y time period to ~20% over the past 6 months). Unlike the taper tantrum time period back in 2013, real rate differentials between AXJ and the U.S. are much higher today, which should lend some support to Asian currencies. Higher real rate differentials today also help to add to the macro stability narrative vs. 2013.

    Moreover, AXJ currencies are screening as slightly undervalued relative to history across a variety of FX models (Exhibit 7). We take a closer look at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) models that take into consideration inflation and productivity differentials. Behavioral Equilibrium Exchange Rate (BEER) models are a more sophisticated version of PPP models that takes into account other important variables, like terms of trade differences, ratio between domestic and foreign productivity levels and degree of openness. Lastly, we do not forget the Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rate (FEER) models, where currency valuations depend solely on the current account balance of a country and how that projects onto Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) misalignments. The relative cheapness of the FEER metric today is a reinforcement of our earlier observation on how the current account balance situation is much healthier today than in 2013 for AXJ constituent countries. 

    EXHIBIT 7: CHEAP ASIA EX-JAPAN CURRENCY VALUATIONS SHOWCASE THE PROTECTION OFFERED BY HEALTHIER CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCES
    MSCI ASIA EX-JAPAN FX MIS-ALIGNMENT VS. USD ACROSS VARIOUS FX MODELS

    Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. *FEER stands for Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rate. **BEER stands for Behavioral Equilibrium Exchange Rate. ***PPP stands for Purchasing Power Parity.
    Data reflect most recently available as of 31/01/22.

    Conclusion and Part II preview

    In addressing the common push backs to investing in AXJ and broader EM equities, historical analysis gives reason to suggest AXJ and EM equities could perform positively over the near term. Economic re-opening in the region has seen the narrowing of growth differentials relative to developed markets, which typically bodes well for AXJ and EM equities, while improved macro fundamentals relative to 2013 give us confidence that AXJ and EM equities and currencies are in a much better position to weather the anticipated rise in U.S. real rates.

    With the macro backdrop established, in part II of this note we establish the key tenets forming our positive outlook on AXJ equities from a valuation and earnings outlook perspective. We showcase how AXJ equity valuations remain compelling across several key metrics and highlight the key economic drivers of corporate earnings in the region.

    09t1222102075005

    The Market Insights program provides comprehensive data and commentary on global markets without reference to products. Designed as a tool to help clients understand the markets and support investment decision-making, the program explores the implications of current economic data and changing market conditions. 

    For the purposes of MiFID II, the JPM Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs are marketing communications and are not in scope for any MiFID II / MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. Furthermore, the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs, as non-independent research, have not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, nor are they subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.

    This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own financial professional, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be appropriate to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not reliable indicators of current and future results.

    J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

    To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://am.jpmorgan.com/global/privacy.

    This communication is issued by the following entities:

    In the United States, by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. or J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc., both regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission; in Latin America, for intended recipients’ use only, by local J.P. Morgan entities, as the case may be. In Canada, for institutional clients’ use only, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and territories except the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In the United Kingdom, by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other European jurisdictions, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. In Asia Pacific (“APAC”), by the following issuing entities and in the respective jurisdictions in which they are primarily regulated: JPMorgan Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, each of which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong; JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), this advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited, which is a member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Australia, to wholesale clients only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth), by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL 376919). For all other markets in APAC, to intended recipients only.

    For U.S. only: If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

    Copyright 2023 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

    • Market Bulletins
    lets-solve-it-logo

    For more information, please call or email us. You can also contact your J.P. Morgan representative.

    (852) 2978 7788

    agents.info@jpmorgan.com

    J.P. Morgan Asset Management

    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookies Policy
    • Investment Stewardship
    • Fund Notes
    • Offering Document(s)
    • Forms & Literature
    • Complaint Resolution
    • Guide to Using This Website
    • Sitemap
    Whatsapp
    J.P. Morgan

    • J.P. Morgan
    • JPMorgan Chase
    • Chase

    Important: This area of the website is intended only for distributors of JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited. Information is not intended for retail or public distribution.

    Investment involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. In particular, funds which are invested in emerging markets and smaller companies may involve a higher degree of risk and are usually more sensitive to price movements. Investors should carefully read and consider the fund offering document(s), which contain details on investment objectives, risk factors, charges and expenses of the fund, before making any investment decisions. Information in this website does not constitute investment advice, or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, investment product or service, nor a distribution of information for any such purpose. Informational sources are considered reliable but you should conduct your own verification of information contained herein. The above information has not been reviewed by the SFC, issued by JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited.

    Copyright 2023 JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited. All rights reserved.