[START RECORDING]
FEMALE VOICE 1: This podcast has been prepared exclusively for institutional, wholesale, professional clients and qualified investors only as defined by local laws and regulations. Please read other important information, which can be found on the link at the end of the podcast episode.
MR. MICHAEL CEMBALEST: Good morning, everybody and welcome to the 2022 holiday Eye on the Market. First, I'm pleased to offer everyone this week's piece, a holiday gift I had commissioned for you. It's a one-of-a-kind non fungible token drawing in here of a Bored Ape. And if you follow the NFT market at all, you will know what that's all about. And it's a cute little ape and he's holding a dollar bill that he's burnt to a crisp, and his T shirt says Ape Innovation ETF. So there you go. My present to you.
Like 20 years ago, in 2002, 2022 was also a year when lots of unprofitable companies, not just NFTs, got repriced. The first chart here shows the remarkable similarity between the NASDAQ 100 spike and collapse 20 years ago to what happened this time around with all sorts of profitless innovation companies, online shopping, cryptos, backs, fintech, hydrogen metaverse, et cetera. The title of the chart is Dumb and Dumber. I think this time around was dumber, because we've all seen this movie before, and people should have been more in tune with it.
I've also got a couple of charts in here that update where we are on the YUKs and the MUCs. This is something I started writing about in our 2020 outlook, and it's how we monitor the price for equity risk. The YUCs are young, unprofitable companies. And the MUCs are the mega-valued companies with a PE of over 50. And roughly two-thirds of the YUC/MUC surge has now been reversed, which leaves a little bit left to go. But I think we're closer to the end of this YUC/MUC repricing than the beginning of it, for obvious reasons.
During the whole stimulus bonanza from the fed and from the treasury on fiscal policy, digital assets got priced at a hugely unrealistic premium, relative to physical assets. And now that monetary policy and fiscal policy are normalizing, I'm not surprised to see, for instance, a basket of farm equipment, office cleaning supplies and industrial REIT stocks outperforming one of the well-known innovation ETFs. And I'm also not surprised to see oil, gas and pipelines outperforming renewable energy again this year, for all the reasons that we discussed in our annual energy paper. You know, the world is a pretty tough and unforgiving place, and our job is to try and help you navigate that.
And on the energy issue, what was kind of remarkable this year is how many investors and politicians underestimated the importance of Russia. I mean, this is a country, how much damage could they do? Their share of world GDP is just 3%, which is the lowest in 200 years. And while that calculation was part of a broader underappreciation for thermal energy, ammonia, fertilizer and things like that, when the world was more captivated by what was going on in the wind and solar power industries. That's changing now.
Germany just finished building the first of five floating LNG regasification units. France is planning for a substantial nuclear renaissance. And China is importing as much Russian gas and coal as they possibly can as part of a broader geopolitical realignment. And so--and while Russia is laying waste to Ukraine's power grid, I wouldn't be surprised if there's a ceasefire at some point in the new year, partially driven by the need for Europe to regain access to some amount of Russian energy, probably oil, and whatever land-based pipelines can be reopened.
To finish up 2022, I've created three rules for investors to follow. And I'm going to briefly talk about them now. The first rule is the Gensler rule. Okay? So Gary Gensler is the SEC Commissioner. And obviously, this has to do with all of the stuff going on with FTX and people saying, well, why didn't the SEC do more? Existing rules give the SEC jurisdiction over crypto intermediary platforms, you know, exchanges and broker dealers, to prevent fraud, manipulation, front running wash sales and the usual suspects.
But in order for the SEC to get involved, they typically have to make a determination that this interim--crypto intermediary is trafficking in securities. And that's a very loaded phrase. And when it does so, the SEC is acting pursuant to a Howey test, H-O-W-E-Y, that's many decades old, although it's been upheld recently by the federal courts. And when they do act according to this Howey test, they're almost always acting over the objections of the entire crypto industry, a lot of politicians in both parties, very influential venture capital firms and even people within the SEC itself.
So you can criticize Gensler and the SEC here if you want, but the Gensler rule that I am proclaiming is that you can only criticize them for what happened at FTX if you meet all of the following six criteria. Okay? Number one, you have stated that cryptocurrencies, although not Bitcoin, many of them qualify as securities and not commodities. And at the SEC, we should be the one making that determination based on the existing Howey test, unless Congress makes a new one. Two, you believe that the SEC should have responsibility for regulating onshore and offshore crypto exchanges when they're dealing with US customers on securities.
It's not that hard for the SEC and the CFTC to establish jurisdiction on offshore entities, because whenever they have a nexus with UN individuals, that's all they need. That's not very difficult to do. It's an open secret that US crypto investors are--can easily evade jurisdictional firewalls. And one estimate from the Wall Street Journal was about 60% of all crypto derivative trades were actually executed by US entities on the offshore unit of FTX.
Litmus test number three, you support the many speeches that Gensler and his predecessor at the SEC, Jay Clayton, made on crypto risks. You support the SEC's 100-plus crypto enforcement actions to date against things like Grayscale, Telegram, BlockFi, Coinbase, LBRY, et cetera. Number four, you're not one of the senators or congressional representatives that received campaign contributions from Coinbase, Digital Currency Group, Ripple, Blockchain Capital and places like that, that typically argue against SEC jurisdiction.
And you're also not one of the eight House members that wrote to Gensler in the SEC in March of this year complaining about SEC information gathering from FTX and other crypto exchanges. These eight House members, for each and in each party, wrote that these information requests were burdensome and stifling innovation. So there you go.
Fourth litmus test, you acknowledge that Binance and Deribit and Bitfinex and a lot of these other entities domicile outside of the United States because of more stringent US rules. US investors don't transact in crypto offshore because there's not enough regulatory clarity onshore, it's that they don't like the regulatory clarity that exists. US investors, crypto investors transact offshore since that's what the crypto industry offers the highest margin lending and the widest selection of token and derivative products.
And then the sixth one, litmus test, is you can't own any books or articles or pamphlets by Ayn Rand. If you do, you can't complain about the lack of SEC jurisdiction. The bottom line is, all of these comments from the crypto industry about the FTX failure being a consequence of lack of regulatory clarity is, in my opinion, a lot of self-interested nonsense. Securities regulations are rarely prescriptive and they're part of a broader framework that's designed to be flexible enough to apply to new instruments as they get creative.
The crypto industry litigated against requirements in the Infrastructure Act to prevent retailer fraud. They complained bitterly about SEC efforts to put crypto exchanges under their purview. I would advise you to simply ignore everything that they complained about as it relates to FTX and the SEC and everything else.
So for two very different views on the crypto world, I'll end this section by saying, just read our Maltese Falcoin piece from February of this year on crypto and compare that to the absolutely hilarious profile of deposed FTX CEO Fried that had--that was posted, at one point, on Sequoia Capital's website. But they took it down, but you can still find it archived online.
Two more rules for 2022, and then we'll wrap it up. One of them is the Siren's Rule. In Greek mythology, the Sirens lured sailors to their deaths. They would sing beautiful songs, and then the sailors would come in and they would drown them. The same thing happens sometimes in emerging markets. And the Siren's Rule is beware of false promises and shifting priorities.
The classic example, of course, is Argentina, that borrowed tons of money right before it defaulted in 1989, 2001 and 2020. And most of that money they borrowed was external debt. So the blueprint is, borrow lots of foreign capital and then default on it.
Another example is Russia. Russia has a long history of nationalizing foreign assets. They did so as far back as 1917. And then Putin revived that when he came into power. And by 2008, half of all of Russian industrial output was produced by companies that were under state control.
Despite that history, there was a lot of foreign direct investment in Russia from 2005 to 2013, right before Russia's invasion of Crimea. And then that prompted some sanctions. And then the sanctions were tightened again this year after it invaded the rest of Ukraine. There's lots of foreign direct investment at risk here from the big oil companies, German automakers, and 4,000 German companies that are doing business in Russia. So that's another example of watch out for shifting priorities.
And the last one is China. China enacted a lot of market friendly policies and--that lured MSCI into increasing China's weight in the Emerging Market Index to 40% by January of 2021. I mean, it was only 15% a decade before that. So right when China hits 40% of the whole EM equity index, drawing in lots of foreign capital, Xi's campaign, of what we can call progressive authoritarianism began, which obviously changed the business dynamics and valuations for a lot of Chinese companies that fell afoul of what the Chinese government was trying to do.
And then led to the largest underperformance of Chinese equities on record. Over the last three years, they've underperformed the rest of the world by 50%. So another example of that Siren's Rule, Chinese policies were very market friendly, lured in lots of capital, then the rules changed and foreign investors lost a lot of money.
The last--the last rule for this year for investors is the Summers' Rule, which I'm naming after Larry Summers. I know Larry a little bit, and what I know of Larry is that he's willing to take very unpopular positions when he thinks he's right, even if they conflict with some of the economic orthodoxy of the day. And so the Summers' Rule is that when Larry talks, you should probably listen to him.
In February of 2021, Larry was the one, before anybody else was doing it, arguing that the labor market was going to heal really rapidly, there was going to be a lot of pent-up savings deployed, and that stimulus tacked onto already massive deficits was going to--was going to reignite wage and price inflation. Very few people were saying it, very few people believed him. He was totally spot on. And I was one of the people that listened to him.
At the time, in our February Eye on the Market, right after his op-ed, I wrote that I think that Larry is onto something here and that Powell was going to face some difficult decisions well before the midterms. Markets were pricing in a Fed that was on hold for years. And I wrote that even if the Fed went slow on the policy rate, there was a big question for markets as to what happened when it would rise. And that that journey would involve substantial equity and credit market corrections, depending on the speed, which is exactly what happened. So Larry's inflation roadmap ended up being a useful roadmap for us, as well, on markets.
So let's see, good news and bad news. First, the bad news. The NFT that I've made for you has declined in value by 25% since you started listening to this podcast. The good news is our 2023 Eye on the Market will be released, as usual, on January 1st of next year. And I'd like to wish everybody a safe and happy holiday season. So long.
FEMALE VOICE 1: Michael Cembalest's Eye on the Market offers a unique perspective on the economy, current events, markets and investment portfolios, and is a production of JP Morgan Asset and Wealth Management. Michael Cembalest is the Chairman of Market and Investment Strategy for JP Morgan Asset Management and is one of our most renowned and provocative speakers. For more information please subscribe to the Eye on the Market by contacting your JP Morgan representative.
If you'd like to hear more, please explore episodes on iTunes or on our website. This podcast is intended for informational purposes only and is a communication on behalf of JP Morgan Institutional Investments Incorporated. Views may not be suitable for all investors and are not intended as personal investment advice or as solicitation or recommendation. Outlooks and past performance are never guarantees of future results. This is not investment research. Please read other important information, which can be found at www.jpmorgan.com/disclaimer-eotm.
[END RECORDING]
