Review of markets over the third quarter 2018 - J.P. Morgan Asset Management
CLOSE

Review of markets over the third quarter 2018

Contributors Michael Bell, Global Markets Insights Strategy Team

A booming US economy has driven US stocks and Treasury yields higher this quarter, leaving US equities some way ahead of the pack over the year as a whole. In September, US consumer confidence hit its highest level since 2000, while the monthly average of initial jobless claims fell to the lowest level since 1969. Wage growth rose to the highest level since 2009, supporting retail sales growth of over 7% year on year. Also, the National Federation of Independent Business’s survey showed that small businesses were the most optimistic they’ve been since the survey began in 1974. Against this remarkably strong growth backdrop it’s not surprising that US equities have delivered attractive returns.

At the start of the year the market thought there was only a 20% probability that, by now, the Federal Reserve (Fed) would have already raised rates three times this year. Even at the start of July, markets thought there was a 40% chance that the Fed wouldn’t increase rates again in the third quarter. However, by the time the Fed raised rates last week, bond markets had already fully priced in the increase, with Treasury yields drifting higher over the quarter.

Exhibit 1: Asset class and style returns in local currency

Source: Barclays, Bloomberg, FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. DM Equities: MSCI World; REITs: FTSE NAREIT All REITs; Cmdty: Bloomberg UBS Commodity Index; Global Agg: Barclays Global Aggregate; Growth: MSCI World Growth; Value: MSCI World Value; Small cap: MSCI World Small Cap. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 30 September 2018.

Emerging market (EM) equities have been weighed down by a slowdown in the pace of Chinese credit growth, fears over the vulnerability of some economies to tighter US monetary policy and concerns about the potential impact of global trade tensions. China has successfully slowed the pace of non-bank credit growth but, faced with the external headwind of US tariffs, the authorities are now easing policy to support domestic growth, while maintaining regulatory pressure on shadow lending. This should provide some support for those EM countries that depend on Chinese demand.

On the other hand, the EM economies that are most reliant on external funding are finding the tightening in US monetary policy challenging. As the Fed continues to raise rates and unwind its balance sheet, EM countries with large dollar-denominated debts and significant, or widening, current account or fiscal deficits may continue to struggle. Higher oil prices are not helpful in this context for those EM economies that are large oil importers, particularly those whose currencies have fallen sharply, further increasing the cost of imports in local currency terms. The tightening in interest rates that some economies have been forced into to defend their currencies and control inflation will prove a drag on growth.

UK equities have been weighed down by fears of a no-deal Brexit. Interestingly, the inverse correlation between the pound and UK equities has broken down recently. Perhaps, as the deadline for a deal edges closer, investors are becoming less willing to view the possiblity of a no-deal Brexit as a positive for the stock market, even with the sterling weakness that would accompany such an outcome.

It is possible that investors view deadlock within the Conservative Party as increasing the risk of a Labour government with a populist agenda. This concern complicates the outlook for UK investors, who had become used to a weak pound helping UK stocks. In our view, a relatively soft Brexit would remove much of the existing Brexit risk premium in equities but likely cause a meaningful rally in the pound and a faster pace of rate rises than is currently expected. This makes the outlook for UK equities particularly hard to predict, even if you knew the likely outcome of the negotiations, which clearly remains uncertain despite our base case that a no-deal scenario will be avoided.

Exhibit 2: World stock market returns in local currency

Source: FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, Standard & Poor’s, TOPIX, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 30 September 2018.

In Japan, there are now more jobs available per applicant than at any point since 1974. Banks also continue to expand credit, in stark contrast to the deflationary period in the early 2000s. The rally in the dollar against the yen, helped by rising interest rate differentials, has been supportive of Japanese equities over the quarter.

Since the beginning of the year, there has been a material weakening in the eurozone manufacturing new export orders survey. Much of the weakness appears to have come from a sharp slowdown in exports to China. As the Chinese ease policy to support domestic demand this pressure could ease but a potential further deterioration in the external environment continues to pose a risk to eurozone growth. The main risk is that weaker exports combined with higher oil prices feed into weaker domestic consumption, which has so far held up pretty well, supported by falling unemployment. Consumer confidence has fallen steadily since the start of the year, with a particularly sharp decline in France. Italian political developments and the pending approval of the new budget could also prove a source of volatility over the coming quarter, although Italian government bond yields have already risen materially since April.

The most obvious near-term risk to the global economy is the potential for a further escalation in trade tariffs emanating from the US, and the subsequent retaliation. So far the US is imposing tariffs on about $250 billion of imports from China, and China has retaliated with tariffs on about $110 billion of US exports to China. The tariff rate is scheduled to increase in January if a deal cannot be reached and an escalation to imposing tariffs on all of China’s exports to the US has been threatened. This trade conflict has already escalated further than we initially expected and we have limited visibility over how it will develop. The worst case scenario could prove a meaningful drag on global growth at the same time as pushing prices higher. However, the trade negotiations haven’t been all bad news, with a new NAFTA deal and a cooling in threats to impose tariffs on US auto imports, at least for now.

Exhibit 3: Fixed income sector returns in local currency

Source: Barclays, BofA/Merrill Lynch, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. IL: Barclays Global Inflation-Linked; Euro Treas: Barclays Euro Aggregate Government - Treasury; US Treas: Barclays US Aggregate Government - Treasury; Global IG: Barclays Global Aggregate - Corporates; US HY: BofA/Merrill Lynch US HY Constrained; Euro HY: BofA/Merrill Lynch Euro Non-Financial HY Constrained; EM Debt: J.P. Morgan EMBIG. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 30 September 2018.

Fixed income returns have been pretty uninspiring, with high yield credit outperforming government bonds. Against a backdrop of very strong growth, rising inflation and rising interest rates in the US, it is notable that, while unexciting, fixed income returns haven’t been as bad as some might have predicted. Year to date, EM debt has been the clear underperformer although it should be noted that the worst performing EM credits make up a small part of the index. Looking ahead, we believe investors should focus on liquidity within fixed income markets and be aware of elevated leverage in US investment grade credit. Within government bond markets we believe US Treasuries are a more attractive risk hedge than eurozone or UK government bonds.

Exhibit 4: Fixed income government bond returns in local currency

Source: FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. All indices are J.P. Morgan GBIs (Government Bond Indices). All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 30 September 2018.

Overall, global growth remains positive but less synchronised than last year. For now, the US stands out as the clear leader in terms of growth. In the near term, the main risk appears to be that the trade conflict will escalate and weigh on business and consumer sentiment. So far there are some signs that this may be happening outside the US, but the US itself has remained resilient. The extent to which the US and the rest of the world can withstand the impact of the latest round of tariffs and any further escalation will be key for the outlook and unfortunately remains uncertain.

In the medium term, the primary risk seems to be that the US economy, while currently booming, is in the later stages of the business cycle, and no recovery lasts forever. The combination of these near-term and medium-term risks argue for turning the dial1 closer to neutral in portfolios, to reflect the fact that—while growth currently remains healthy—the risks are gradually rising.

Exhibit 5: Index returns for September 2018 (%)

Source: MSCI, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data as of 30 September 2018.


1 Turning the dial: Portfolio considerations in the late cycle, Karen Ward & Michael Bell, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, September 2018

Related Solutions

J.P. Morgan Global Liquidity
Today’s complexities require a dedicated liquidity partner committed to helping clients succeed through all market cycles.
Performance & Yields
J.P. Morgan delivers comprehensive solutions based on the unique investment objectives of your organization.
Liquidity Insights
View original research, reports and commentary from our portfolio managers, analysts, economists, and traders.

Important information

This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields is not a reliable indicator of current and future results.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. This communication is issued in the United Kingdom by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, Registered in England No. 01161446. Registered address: 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP.