Investment outlook 2019: Mid-year update - Trade war and Europe - J.P. Morgan Asset Management
CLOSE

Investment outlook 2019: Mid-year update - Trade war and Europe

Contributor Karen Ward
US China trade war most acute in Europe

 

The damage from the trade war is likely to be seen most clearly in Europe. Europe is highly dependent on global trade and capex – the two components of global growth that are faltering. The European Union (EU) is also waiting to hear whether it is next on President Trump’s list of trade injustices to correct. The EU currently charges a tariff of 10% on cars that enter from the US, which compares to a tariff of 2.5% on EU cars entering the US. It is plausible that the harder the US administration goes after China, the less it will risk adding the EU to the agenda. But we can’t be sure. Auto production accounts for as much as 5% of total GDP in Germany, so this is a sizeable dark cloud.

Unfortunately there appear to be few domestic policy levers that can be pulled to support European domestic activity in the face of falling external demand. The only countries willing to use fiscal stimulus are those that are already heavily indebted, such as Italy. The war of words between Brussels and Rome continues, and Italy may be placed under an excessive deficit procedure.

Matteo Salvini, leader of the League party, is undeterred. Emboldened by his victory in the European elections, he wants to step up fiscal expansion with a flat tax. Although these plans will continue to draw consternation in Brussels, it seems unlikely the European Commission will issue financial sanctions on the eurozone’s third-largest country. Italy is too large to be treated in the same manner as Greece.

In Germany there is seemingly little political appetite for government spending or tax cuts, even though the interest rate on German government debt is now negative to 15 years and the cost to the German government of servicing its debt has plummeted. Germany remains unwilling to solve the key problem facing the eurozone: deficient demand.

As in the US, the pressure to keep the show on the road is falling on the central bank. But unlike the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank’s (ECB’s) fuel tank is running very low given that interest rates are already in negative territory. The ECB has committed to keep interest rates at this level at least through the first half of 2020, and provided further liquidity. This leaves investors contemplating whether the ECB might eventually be forced to cut rates into deeper negative territory. In turn, this is weighing on the financial stocks that account for roughly 20% of the European benchmark (see below).

MSCI Europe ex-UK financials and non-financials

Index level, rebased to 100 in January 2004




Source: MSCI, Refinitiv Datastream, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data shown are price index levels in local currency. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current and future results. Data as of 13 June 2019.

Meanwhile, the further decline in sterling demonstrates the impact of ongoing Brexit uncertainty on investor sentiment towards UK assets. There is much excitement about Theresa May’s successor and the potential for this to shift the process forward (see our On the Minds of Investors article). 1

Our view is that the new prime minister is likely to face the same challenges as the last. Passage of any deal remains difficult when the House of Commons remains divided over what it wants from Brexit, which in turn reflects a population ever polarised between leaving the EU with no-deal and a desire to remain (see below).

If you had to choose one outcome of Brexit, what would you prefer to see?

% of respondents




Source: YouGov, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Survey fieldwork was carried out on 10-11 April 2019.

This polarisation is significantly shifting the landscape of UK politics. At some point, one might assume that the heads of the Conservative and Labour parties will realise they have an incentive to work together to deliver Brexit to stem the damage being done to their respective parties. How quickly this realisation dawns, and the degree of damage to the economy in the interim, is still very much in question. In the meantime, investors need to understand the impact that no-deal Brexit would have on markets, vs the impact of a change of government.

No-deal would potentially send sterling lower, but UK Gilts and international FTSE 100 stocks higher, as repatriated earnings benefited from the weaker exchange rate. Meanwhile, a general election risks a change of government to the Labour party, which potentially would focus on less market-friendly practices. A Labour party advocating much higher government spending and a renationalisation of utilities and transport might result in a fall in the price of Gilts and domestic-focused FTSE 100 companies, in particular.

Given these scenarios, a bias in the UK away from small- and mid-cap companies, which tend to be more domestically focused, seems prudent. This should also help build in some resilience to portfolios were a recession scenario to materialise, as UK small-cap stocks have underperformed large-cap in each of the last three US recessions.

1On the Minds of Investors: How will the Brexit negotiations conclude? Karen Ward, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, June 2019.

0903c02a82603de2

Download the full 2019 outlook  

Key themes for 2019


Important information

This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields is not a reliable indicator of current and future results.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. This communication is issued in the United Kingdom by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, Registered in England No. 01161446. Registered address: 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP.