JPM_logo_Eng
  • Funds

    Fund Explorer

    • Search our funds

    Capabilities

    • Fixed Income
    • Equities
    • Multi-Asset
    • Alternatives
    • ETF Capabilities

    Fund Information

    • Fund News and Announcements
    • Regulatory Updates
    • Capacity Management
  • Investment Themes
    • Sustainable investing
    • Emerging Market and China Equities
    • Strategic Beta
    • Fixed income investing
  • Insights

    Market Insights

    • Guide to the Markets
    • On the Minds of Investors
    • The Weekly Brief
    • Investment Principles
    • Investment Outlook
    • Market Watch
    • Monthly Market Review

    Portfolio Insights

    • Bond Bulletin
    • Monthly Strategy Report
    • Asset Allocation Views
    • Fixed Income Views
    • Equity Views
    • Factor Views
    • Emerging Market Debt Strategy
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Global Alternatives Outlook
    • ETF Perspectives

    Webconferences

    • Webconferences
  • Library
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Skip to main content
  • Role
  • Country
Search
Menu
CLOSE
Search
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. ETF Perspectives
  4. IG Corporate Bonds: The Importance of Active Management

  • Share
  • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Line
  • Print
  • Actions
  • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Line
    Print

IG corporate bonds: The importance of active management

Investment grade corporate bonds are increasingly popular among yield-seeking investors. Explore how active strategies are vital to compensate investor risk.

A perfect storm

Suffice to say that on New Year’s Eve 2019, as people around the globe celebrated the beginning of a new year with optimism and enthusiasm, no one could have imagined the perfect storm of unprecedented events that would soon unravel—bringing the global economy and markets to their knees.

The beginning of 2020 quickly became riddled with panic as the global Covid-19 pandemic took its course. As investors fled to cash, no asset market was spared. Within the fixed income market, liquidity effectively all but evaporated, US crude prices fell below zero for the first time in history, and corporate bond spreads reached their widest levels since the global financial crisis of 2008-2009.

While this current crisis is far from over, and many uncertainties lie ahead, the turmoil of the first quarter of 2020 already seems like ancient history. The lessons learned will not soon be forgotten, particularly for investors in IG corporate bonds. 

The attraction of investment grade credit

IG corporates (meaning those rated BBB- and above) have historically been touted as a high quality safe haven for investors seeking a steady stream of income and yield, but with limited appetite for default risk.

After the global financial crisis, historically low interest rates and the never ending search for yield made IG corporate bonds an increasingly popular asset class. Due to the underlying credit risk, these bonds offer a spread premium above government bonds—and as a result, a higher yield—fuelling demand particularly for non-US investors facing negative local rates in Asia and Europe.

This continuous increase in demand, accompanied by seemingly lenient rating agencies, has enabled IG issuers to enjoy nearly uninhibited and low cost access to debt markets, with the amount of IG debt outstanding growing nearly two-fold since 2009. However, as the market has grown, there has been a deterioration in overall credit quality and an increase in dispersion of the underlying creditworthiness of individual issuers.

As a result, the composition, investment characteristics and potential benefits of an IG allocation will be shaped to an even greater extent by the approach used to gain that exposure.

Cheap and easy isn’t always best

Over the years, there has been a significant rise in passive indexing strategies that are designed to closely track an index while minimising costs, and which basically take portfolio composition as a given. Until recently, choosing a passive approach has appeared to be a cheap and easy solution to access the investment grade corporate market.

However, what seems to have eluded investors is that the passive investment style is exposed to an inherent weakness of the IG corporate bond index — its debt-weighted design, which gives the greatest weight to issuers with the greatest amount of debt. The objective to minimise tracking error forces investors to hold higher concentrations in these most indebted issuers without any consideration for the difference in the underlying creditworthiness — and as a result credit risk — of the corporations they are lending to.

In contrast, active, research-driven strategies — that is, those using fundamental, relative value and technical inputs in security selection — seek to identify the most attractive IG holdings from a risk-adjusted return perspective. What’s more, active credit strategies have the flexibility to respond to shifts in an index’s composition, by focusing on selecting securities that compensate investors for the amount of risk they are taking. 

Don’t run out of fuel

Now more than ever, it is critical to understand the fundamental risk of individual companies and to ensure investors are being appropriately compensated for that risk.

Given the amount of growth in corporate debt and leverage, IG bonds have become more susceptible to downgrade risk, with nearly 50% of the market comprised of lower quality BBB-rated issuers. In a strong economic environment, like we have seen over the last decade, these companies are able to hold higher levels of debt at very little cost. This situation can continue as long as revenues and growth are maintained. However, when the fuel tank runs out, there will be a price to pay for this risk. And that is exactly what has happened this year.

Take the Ford Motor Company, for example, which was downgraded to high yield at the end of March. As the market started to price in this downgrade, the credit spread — or risk premium — on Ford’s bonds widened over 600 basis points, and the price of these bonds fell from €104.33 to €81.89 (over 20%) in just one month. 

With around €13 billion ($14 billion) of euro-denominated [HRW1] [LC(G2] debt outstanding, Ford was a relatively large component of the European IG Corporate Index. Due to the nature of passive indexing, investors using a passive approach to gain exposure to IG credit would have been forced owners of these bonds, and consequently forced sellers when the index rebalanced at month end.

Avoid the fallen angels

Year to date, over $200 billion of investment grade corporate debt has been downgraded to junk bond status. These “fallen angels account for over 1.5% of the Global Investment Grade Index and over 2% of the US Investment Grade Index. Over the course of the next three months, these downgrades are likely to continue.

In this volatile and uncertain environment, distinguishing between the good credits and the bad, using an active, research-driven approach, could make all the difference. Find out how our Corporate Bond Research-Enhanced Index ETFs benefit from the scale and breadth of our credit research platform to target excess returns with index-like risk.

JPMorgan-ETF-Ticker-JREB

(JREB) JPM EUR Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index UCITS ETF

JREB
JPMorgan-ETF-Ticker-JRUB

(JRUB) JPM USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index UCITS ETF

JRUB
JPMorgan-ETF-Ticker-JR15

(JR15) JPM EUR Corporate Bond 1-5 yr Research Enhanced Index UCITS ETF

JR15
ETFs

This is a marketing communication and as such the views contained herein are not to be taken as an advice or recommendation to buy or sell any investment or interest thereto. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Any research in this document has been obtained and may have been acted upon by J.P. Morgan Asset Management for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available as additional information and do not necessarily reflect the views of J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Any forecasts, figures, opinions, statements of financial market trends or investment techniques and strategies expressed are, unless otherwise stated, J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s own at the date of this document. They are considered to be reliable at the time of writing, may not necessarily be all inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. They may be subject to change without reference or notification to you. It should be noted that the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance and yield are not a reliable indicator of current and future results. There is no guarantee that any forecast made will come to pass. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our EMEA Privacy Policy www.jpmorgan.com/emea-privacy-policy.
 

This communication is issued in Europe (excluding UK) by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l., 6 route de Trèves, L-2633 Senningerberg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B27900, corporate capital EUR 10.000.000.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Accessibility statement
  • Sitemap
  • Investment stewardship
  • Remuneration disclosure
Decorative
J.P. Morgan

  • J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Chase

Copyright © 2021 JPMorgan Chase & Co., all rights reserved.


We use cookies to provide necessary site functionality and improve your online experience. To learn more about the cookies we use, view our Cookies Policy.

Close
ACCEPT
Read our cookie policy