Skip to main content
logo
  • Funds

    Fund Explorer

    • Search our funds

    Capabilities

    • Fixed Income
    • Equities
    • Multi-Asset
    • Alternatives
    • ETF Capabilities

    Fund Information

    • Fund news and announcements
    • Regulatory updates
    • Capacity management
  • Investment Themes
    • Sustainable investing
    • Strategic Beta
    • Fixed income investing
    • Market volatility
    • Investing in China
  • Insights

    Market Insights

    • Guide to the Markets
    • Guide to Alternatives
    • On the Minds of Investors
    • The Weekly Brief
    • Investment Principles
    • Investment Outlook
    • Monthly Market Review
    • Insights App
    • ESG Explained

    Portfolio Insights

    • Bond Bulletin
    • Monthly Strategy Report
    • Asset Allocation Views
    • Fixed Income Views
    • Equity Views
    • Factor Views
    • Emerging Market Debt Strategy
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Global Alternatives Outlook
    • ETF Perspectives

    Webconferences

    • Webconferences
  • Library
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Role
  • Country
  • Search
    Search
    Menu
    1. The social factor – unfairly underrated

    • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Line
    the-social-factor-unfairly-underrated.html-2800x900px

    The social factor – unfairly underrated

    September 2021
    Aamina Kurji

     

    Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors have all grown in importance for investors in recent years. But the S in ESG – the social factor – has, until recently, often played second fiddle to environmental considerations.

    This neglect is understandable, because what makes up the social factor – how well companies treat their employees, suppliers and customers – is harder to measure than performance on the environment or in governance. Nonetheless, failing to pay heed to the social factor is a mistake because there appears to be some correlation between social performance and share price performance.

    The benefits of happy employees

    One way to measure this correlation is by looking at Glassdoor, the website where employees anonymously rate employers. Over the past 10 years, the share prices of companies ranked in the top fifth in Glassdoor ratings have outperformed companies ranked in the bottom fifth by over 6%. Glassdoor provides useful quantitative and qualitative evidence, so it can help open the door to engagement with management on social issues. We used Glassdoor, for example, to start a conversation with a management team about issues employees were raising on the platform. This prompted a productive discussion with senior executives about what they thought they could do to address these issues.

    Exhibit 1: Glassdoor versus returns
    This glassdoor model is a proprietary neural network, which was trained to forecast future financial performance from content in Glassdoor reviews. The model was trained in an expanding window manner, using 5 million reviews from more than 5,000 unique publicly-traded companies, covering the time period from 2008 to present. For more information please refer to footnote.

    Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of current and future results. Data as at July 2021.

    After building the model, a comprehensive series of out-of sample backtests were conducted to assess the model’s predictive performance. In aggregate since 2011, companies that rank in the top quintile of the model’s overall Glassdoor score have outperformed those in the bottom quintile by approximately 6.2% and 12.1% annualized respectively.

    Another example of how employee satisfaction can contribute to a better company is Rentokil Initial, a British pest-control and hygiene company. The company has a strong culture of listening to employees; this has likely contributed to its high employee retention rate of 85%. Importantly, customer retention is equally high at 86%, supporting the idea that happier employees produce more satisfied customers because the workers tend do their jobs better.

    The value of customer service

    Treating customers well is another social factor that can also have an impact on company performance, as evidenced by the recent issue of travel refunds thrown up by the pandemic. Customers who booked directly with a hotel or airline found it easier to secure a refund than if they had booked through a third party. We believe that this may translate into an increase in direct bookings, which allows us to try to capture and quantify the differences in customer service by feeding these expected new booking trends into our earnings growth estimates.

    Diversity in focus

    Treating employees and customers well is one way companies are taking the social factor more seriously. The corporate sector, as a whole, also seems to be paying more attention to social factors. For example, since early 2020 there has been a sharp rise in the number of management mentions of diversity and inclusion in the earnings calls of companies in the MSCI All Country World Index.

    Exhibit 2: The importance of social issues in ESG investing
    Corporate mentions of “diversity”/“inclusion” in earnings calls
    Number of mentions for MSCI ACWI companies, four-quarter moving average

    Source: MSCI, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Guide to the Markets - UK. Data as of 30 June 2021.

    Studies have started to examine the impact diversity on corporate performance. A 2018 study by McKinsey found that companies in the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams were 21% more likely to outperform on profitability and 27% more likely to have superior value creation, while companies in the top quartile for ethnic/cultural diversity on executive teams were 33% more likely to have industry-leading profitability1.

    Conclusion

    We believe increased corporate focus on social factors will ultimately be good for productivity, economic growth and – in the long term – corporate profits and share prices. We see much for investors to celebrate in the future if the social factor is good for share prices.

    1Source McKinsey, Delivering through Diversity, January 2019. www.mckinsey.com

    09gm210609103335

    • Environmental Social And Governance

    IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

    For the purposes of MiFID II, the JPM Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs are marketing communications and are not in scope for any MiFID II / MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. Furthermore, the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programs, as non-independent research, have not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, nor are they subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.

    This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own financial professional, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be appropriate to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not reliable indicators of current and future results.

    J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.

    To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at https://am.jpmorgan.com/global/privacy.

    This communication is issued by the following entities:

    In the United States, by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. or J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc., both regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission; in Latin America, for intended recipients’ use only, by local J.P. Morgan entities, as the case may be. In Canada, for institutional clients’ use only, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and territories except the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In the United Kingdom, by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other European jurisdictions, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. In Asia Pacific (“APAC”), by the following issuing entities and in the respective jurisdictions in which they are primarily regulated: JPMorgan Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, each of which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong; JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), this advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited, which is a member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Australia, to wholesale clients only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth), by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL 376919). For all other markets in APAC, to intended recipients only.

    For U.S. only: If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.

    Copyright 2021 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

    J.P. Morgan Asset Management

    • Terms of use
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookie policy
    • Accessibility statement
    • Sitemap
    • Investment stewardship
    Decorative
    J.P. Morgan

    • J.P. Morgan
    • JPMorgan Chase
    • Chase

    Copyright © 2022 JPMorgan Chase & Co., all rights reserved.