JPM_logo_Eng
  • Funds

    Fund Explorer

    • Search our funds

    Capabilities

    • Fixed Income
    • Equities
    • Multi-Asset
    • Alternatives
    • ETF Capabilities

    Fund Information

    • Fund News and Announcements
    • Regulatory Updates
    • Capacity Management
  • Investment Themes
    • Sustainable investing
    • Emerging Markets
    • European Equities
    • Managing Volatility
    • Future of Fixed Income
    • Strategic Beta
    • Fixed income investing
  • Insights

    Market Insights

    • Guide to the Markets
    • On the Minds of Investors
    • The Weekly Brief
    • Investment Principles
    • Investment Outlook
    • Market Watch
    • Monthly Market Review
    • US Presidential Election 2020

    Portfolio Insights

    • Bond Bulletin
    • Monthly Strategy Report
    • Asset Allocation Views
    • Fixed Income Views
    • Equity Views
    • Factor Views
    • Emerging Market Debt Strategy
    • Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
    • Global Alternatives Outlook
    • ETF Perspectives

    Webconferences

    • Webconferences
  • Library
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Skip to main content
  • Role
  • Country
Search
Menu
CLOSE
Search
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Factor Views

  • Share
  • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
  • Email
  • Download
  • Print
  • Actions
  • LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
    Email Download Print

Factor Views 4Q 2020

Themes from the quarterly Quantitative Beta Research Summit

28-10-2020

Yazann Romahi

Garrett Norman

In brief

  • Factor performance was mixed, on balance, over the quarter with many factors following recent trajectories.

  • Equity value continued to plumb new depths; quality was negative for a second consecutive quarter as fundamental factors generally underperformed.

  • Merger arbitrage enjoyed a strong quarter; however, other event-driven factors have not bounced back from losses suffered earlier in 2020.

  • Macro factors declined as reversals across currency and commodity markets impacted momentum positioning.

  • We continue to see the outlook for equity value and equity quality as attractive; we have tempered our view across event-driven factors.

Overview

Risk assets continued their climb in the third quarter, buoyed by the ongoing global economic recovery, unprecedented policy support and sentiment that remained positive for much of the quarter before fading in September. Equity markets were up across the globe, driven by familiar themes: the U.S. outperformed other regions, technology ranked among the top performing sectors and large cap stocks surpassed small caps. High yield bonds and inflation-linked bonds were the best performing segments of fixed income markets as nominal bonds remained range bound. The U.S. dollar fell, particularly against the euro and the British pound. The majority of commodity markets rallied, many reversing losses from earlier in the year. Against this backdrop, the factors that we favor were mixed, with equity value extending its plunge and the equity momentum and merger arbitrage factors finishing positive again (Exhibit 1).

We remain optimistic in our outlook across equity factors as valuations are supportive of equity value and equity quality. We acknowledge difficulty, however, in forecasting the turning point for those factors that have underperformed of late, especially if we remain on the current macro trajectory and in the same market regime.

Factors were mixed in Q3, though they remain down, in aggregate, over the past year

Exhibit 1: Quantitative beta strategies long/short factor returns

Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; data as of September 30, 2020.
Note: Factors presented are long/short in nature. Equity factors represented as 100% long notional exposure, event-driven (other) scaled to 5% vol, and macro factors as aggregation of 5% vol subcomponents.

Factors in focus

Equity factors: Opportunity for the quality factor continues to improve

Equity factor performance in the third quarter matched patterns from last quarter: momentum led the way while value and quality lagged. The equity value factor continued to plumb new depths, with the current drawdown now extending well past what was experienced in the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s.1 Equity value declined 7% over Q3, the factor’s fourth-worst quarter since 1990. Two of the next-worst quarters occurred in 2020, as well— in Q1 2020 it declined 11%, and in Q2, 9% (Exhibit 2). Losses were comparable across regions (the U.S., Europe, the UK, Asia and emerging markets), sectors (declining in all sectors save for energy) and ways of measuring value (e.g., earnings yield, cash flow yield, dividend yield, book yield).

Particularly noteworthy was how consistent losses were, whether considering the application of value within sectors or across sectors (Exhibit 3). As we have discussed in separate publications,2 we generally favor a within-sector (or sector-neutral) approach in which stocks are evaluated relative to their sector peers with the objective of avoiding sector biases that may expose investors to ancillary risks. While this difference in construction has had a meaningful impact on long-term performance,3 it has not  mattered this year. This highlights the pervasiveness of the current value drawdown and that it goes beyond sector dynamics.

Value underperformance has been significant, regardless of how it is accessed

Exhibit 2: Value factor quarterly performance                        Exhibit 3: YTD Value factor  performance                                                                       



Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; data as of September 30, 2020.                                     Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; data as of September 30,
                                                                                                                                                             2020.

In evaluating the prospects for the value factor, we continue to monitor how much of the underperformance may relate to investor preferences (or even exuberance) for growth companies rather than to underlying fundamentals. If investor preference has been the primary driver of value underperformance, we would expect mean reversion and an eventual rebound in value performance. If the fundamentals have dominated, we would ascribe recent underperformance to market participants correctly anticipating value companies’ fundamental weakness and we would expect no such rebound in value stock performance. In prior quarters, we have highlighted how the value factor’s current drawdown was almost fully driven by market sentiment rather than trends in net income growth. As such, we said that we expected market leadership to eventually change. While this generally remains our stance, our outlook is less clear than it was previously, given uncertainties around the path of the coronavirus, in addition to the usual difficulty in predicting changes in market sentiment.

When assessing valuations of the value factor, such as by comparing the forward earnings yield of value companies vs. expensive companies, the factor remains historically cheap — spreads were wider only at the height of the dot-com bubble (Exhibit 4). In December 2016, the forward P/E on value stocks stood at 13.2x, while the forward P/E on expensive stocks stood at 25.8x—with both near their long-term P/E averages of 12.2x and 24.9x, respectively. Since then, multiples on value stocks have dropped by 7% (to 12.3x), whereas multiples on expensive stocks have risen by 98%, to 51.2x. From this per-spective, the outperformance of expensive stocks appears to be the continued inflating of a bubble.

The value factor has become increasingly attractive

Exhibit 4: Value factor valuation spread (Global)

Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; data as of September 30, 2020.
Note: Valuation spread is a z-score between the median P/E ratio of top-quartile stocks and bottom-quartile stocks as ranked by the value factor.

When assessing net income growth trends, however, we see that value companies have gone through a bout of weakness — which may be linked to the impact of COVID-19 on the economy and on markets.4 Over the past year, for example, the median net income growth of value companies declined 22%, vs. a 5% decline for expensive companies (Exhibit 5). While value companies typically exhibit slower net income growth than their more expensive growth counterparts, this gap is significantly wider now than in recent years, and wider than earlier in 2020. However, this gap is not unprecedented and reflects a look in the rearview mirror, with value continuing to look cheap from a forward P/E perspective, as described earlier.

This year net income growth has been considerably worse for value companies than expensive companies

Exhibit 5: Net income growth comparison

Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; data as of September 30, 2020.

Event-driven factors led by merger arbitrage

Event-driven factors were positive, in aggregate, over the quarter, led again by the merger arbitrage factor. While M&A activity has been below average in 2020, the merger arbitrage factor has fully recovered from losses in March when liquidity conditions tightened across markets and negatively impacted the arbitrage space. The spinoffs factor was positive while the share buybacks factor continued to underperform, extending a drawdown of a similar in trajectory to that of the equity value factors.

We have a tempered view on the outlook across event-driven factors, as a decline in corporate activity levels has limited investor ability to capture these factors while also remaining diversified. In addition, merger arbitrage spreads have compressed significantly and are now below average (after widening in March to spreads comparable to those during the global financial crisis of 2008–09).

Macro momentum continues to suffer market reversals

Momentum factors again experienced a challenging quarter, this time disrupted by reversals across currency and commodity mar­kets. Weakness in the U.S. dollar, particularly against the British pound and Norwegian krone, where momentum signals had been positioned bearishly, detracted over the quarter. Within com­modity markets, both relative value and time-series momentum models were hurt by strength across a range of soft commodities (coffee, corn and lean-hog markets in particular). Carry factors were again positive in aggregate, however, gains from positioning in fixed income and currency markets were offset by weakness from positioning in commodity markets.

Carry spreads are generally below long-term averages, particu­larly across G10 government bonds and FX markets. This sug­gests a diminished potential to capture carry in those markets. Among momentum factors, dispersion in price moves was aver­age across currencies and commodities. The number of signifi­cantly trending assets was neutral in aggregate; equity, fixed income and commodity positioning were mixed across markets.

Concluding remarks

Factor performance followed familiar themes over the quarter: equity factors were dragged down by value (and quality); event-driven factors were led by momentum: and macro factors were hurt by reversals across markets. The potential across equity factors looks particularly strong. However, as always, we believe in diversifying across a broad range of compensated factors while minimizing exposure to uncompensated risks.

Factor Opportunity Set

The table below summarizes our outlook for each of the factors accessed by the Quantitative Beta Solutions platform. It does not constitute a recommendation but, rather, indicates our estimate of the attractiveness of factors in the current market environment.

Factor Views Vs. Last quarter:

Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; for illustrative purposes only. 
*Other: Conglomerate discount arbitrage, share repurchases, equity index arbitrage, post-reorganization equities and activism.

Our framework for evaluating factor outlooks is centered on the concepts of dispersion, valuation and the opportunity for diversification. For equity factors, we measure dispersion and valuation spreads between top-quartile and bottom-quartile stocks on a market, region and sector-neutral basis. For event-driven factors, we measure implied carry and the level of corporate activity as indicative of the ability to minimize idiosyncratic stock risk. For macro factors, we measure the dispersion or spread between top-ranked and bottom-ranked markets as well as the number of significantly trending markets.

Glossary

  • Equity momentum: Long/short global developed stocks, based on price change and earnings revisions; sector and region neutral
  • Equity value: Long/short global developed stocks based on book-to-price, earnings yield, dividend yield, cash flow yield; sector and region neutral
  • Equity quality: Long/short global developed stocks based on financial risk, profitability and earnings quality; sector and region neutral

  • Equity size: long/short global developed stocks based on market capitalization; sector and region neutral

  • Merger arb: Long target company and short acquirer (when offer involves stock component) in announced merger deals across global developed markets

  • Event-driven (other): Conglomerate discount arbitrage, share repurchases, equity index arbitrage, post-reorganization equities and shareholder activism

  • Macro carry: FX G10 carry, FX emerging market carry, fixed income term premium, fixed income real yield, commodity carry

  • Macro momentum: FX cross-sectional momentum, commodity cross-sectional momentum and time-series momentum across equity, fixed income and commodity markets

Related Content

Inflation ahead

Higher inflation looks set to be on the cards in the coming months. While the risk of a taper tantrum-like scenario can't be discounted entirely, we see a gradual rise in yields as the more likely outcome.

Read More

Emerging Market Debt Quarterly Strategy | Portfolio Insights

In our view, emerging market growth, led by China, could reach 6.7% in 2021. A backdrop of easy global monetary policy further supports the case for emerging market assets broadly, with risks to the upside.

Read More

Multi-Asset Solutions Monthly Strategy Report

The latest macro-economic events analyzed by the Multi-Asset Solutions management team, in charge of diversified products and asset allocation.

Read More

This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not a reliable indicator of current and future results.
 

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our EMEA Privacy Policy www.jpmorgan.com/emea-privacy-policy.
 

This communication is issued in Europe (excluding UK) by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l., 6 route de Trèves, L-2633 Senningerberg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B27900, corporate capital EUR 10.000.000.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Accessibility statement
  • Sitemap
  • Investment stewardship
Decorative
J.P. Morgan

  • J.P. Morgan
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Chase

Copyright © 2021 JPMorgan Chase & Co., all rights reserved.


We use cookies to provide necessary site functionality and improve your online experience. To learn more about the cookies we use, view our Cookies Policy.

Close
ACCEPT
Read our cookie policy